• Save
Structural Interventions: A Proposed Agenda
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Structural Interventions: A Proposed Agenda



Presented by MEASURE Evaluation Deputy Director Jim Thomas, MPH, PhD.

Presented by MEASURE Evaluation Deputy Director Jim Thomas, MPH, PhD.



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



1 Embed 1

http://www.slashdocs.com 1



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • nrich.maths.org
  • www.sewerhistory.org
  • chemguide.co.uk
  • allmovie.com

Structural Interventions: A Proposed Agenda Structural Interventions: A Proposed Agenda Presentation Transcript

  • Structural Interventions: A proposed agendaJames Thomas, MPH, PhDDepartment of EpidemiologyDeputy Director, MEASURE EvaluationUniversity of North Carolina
  • What I’ll cover What a structural intervention is The measurement challenges The lure of the magic bullet Why pursue structural interventions? The example of women’s land rights A proposed agenda
  • Examples of structural interventions • Removing the pump handle • Sewers • Protected & purified water • Iodized salt • Vehicle air bags • Building regulations • Tobacco control • Closing bath houses
  • Structural interventions (behavioral) (structural) High Personal Volition LowHIV “Have fewer partners” Alleviate povertyDrugs “Just say no” Fight drug cartelsObesity “Exercise more” Walkable neighborhoods
  • Proximal and Distal D C B A
  • Proximal and Distal L J C O U Z A M E R X B Y F
  • The lure of the magic bullet • Proximal • Few other variables • Mechanistic • Quantifiable • Clear counterfactual
  • The lure of the magic bullet
  • Why pursue structural interventions? The high road • True to public health • Human rights
  • Why pursue structural interventions? The pragmatic road • Always cycling against traffic if context not addressed • Magic bullets require systems to develop and distribute them • Hitting many birds with one stone
  • Land rights as a structural factor Less able to Loss of home Loss of control remain in over one’s life treatmentLack of Loss of income- Try income Less condomland rights generating alternatives use property Inability to grow More sex Loss of land partners food
  • Exploring data on land rights and HIV Reviewed literature Reviewed datasets Interviewed land rights organizations
  • Literature Land rights and HIV: qualitative and anecdotal More proximal, more evidence (e.g., conditional cash transfer)
  • Datasets
  • Datasets Aligned with land rights or HIV Modest potential for supplementing existing data
  • Land rights organizations
  • Land rights organizations Preliminary draft
  • International Justice Mission (IJM) Data collected systematically from all clients  Quantitative and qualitative  Computerized Study of property grabbing  Baseline (2005- 2007)  Follow-up (2012)  2nd follow-up (2015)
  • Land rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . and HIV Silos • Professions • Thinking • Funding
  • The silo gap results in… • Fewer shared insights • Fewer shared resources • Lack of scientific evidence • Lack of interventions • No M&E • Unresolved forces of transmission
  • A proposed agenda1. Bring people together Break down silos Leverage existing opportunities
  • A proposed agenda2. Document what we know Inventory the evidence on structural interventions Identify structural components of magic bullets Establish an on-line clearinghouse Write guidance on implementation Propose agendas
  • A proposed agenda3. Build on what we have (example) Help IJM analyze their data Advise IJM on additional data to collect Collect data to complement IJM’s
  • A proposed agenda4. Use non-linear approaches Crowdsourced science
  • A proposed agenda4. Use non-linear approaches Crowdsourced science Agent-based modeling Identify data to collect Model costs and benefits
  • Thanks USAID & PEPFAR Katherine Tumlinson Megan Clarke Evette Cordoba Carolina Mejia ICRW Photo credit: McKay Savage
  • MEASURE Evaluation is a MEASURE project funded by theU.S. Agency for International Development and implemented bythe Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolinaat Chapel Hill in partnership with Futures Group International,ICF Macro, John Snow, Inc., Management Sciences for Health,and Tulane University. Views expressed in this presentation do notnecessarily reflect the views of USAID or the U.S. government.MEASURE Evaluation is the USAID Global Health Bureausprimary vehicle for supporting improvements in monitoring andevaluation in population, health and nutrition worldwide.