Global Health Council-Nyangara

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Notes on slide 1

    The quality monitoring process – starts with establishing quality standards – that guide program implementations Quality monitoring doesn’t need NEW SYSTEMS or new tools!

    The purpose or the hypothesis behind Quality monitoring is to confirm that standards are adhered to and programs are improving child wellbeing. If not what can be done?

    Do program staff, volunteers, caregivers etc find the information useful?

    Markers of QL Improvement (Indicators)

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Global Health Council-Nyangara - Presentation Transcript

    1. Methods for Monitoring Quality of OVC Programs Florence Nyangara, PhD. Futures Group/MEASURE Evaluation Global Health Conference May 29 th , 2009
    2. The Questions?
      • How can we measure and monitor the Quality of OVC programs?
      • Which indicators will provide the most useful information to monitor and improve quality?
    3. Presentation objectives
        • Understand why monitor quality of services
        • Tools and approaches to systematically assess and monitor the quality of OVC services standards i.e. CSI
        • Indicators necessary to make informed decisions to improve, manage, and report on the quality of services provided to OVC?
    4. Quality Monitoring Process
      • Well Defined Quality Standards - established for most Dimensions of Quality, such as technical competence, effectiveness, efficiency, safety, and coverage - for each service domain, i.e. Education
      • Plan a monitoring system and a set of tools to collect data (existing M&E tools - multipurpose)
    5. Ultimate Goal of Improving Quality Comply with the set Standards Set a Quality Monitoring System Standards Set
        • Improved
        • Outcomes
      Improving Quality of Services
    6. Quality Monitoring System/Plan
      • Define objectives and expected results
      • Define key activities or processes
      • Collect the data as usual (use existing tools)
      • Decide what information your program needs to make decisions, i.e. select key indicators
      • Analyze data and use the information to make changes that improve service quality & program
      Inputs Activities Outputs Outcomes
    7. Monitoring QL Improvement
      • M onitoring processes and the measurement of specific outcomes ensures that we are meeting acceptable standards
      • Example in Education:
        • Essential Action (STD) : Engage schools/communities to ensure OVC attend school
      • Process Indicator: # of schools/communities engaged
      • Example Outcome: % OVC attending school or advancing in class/grade level (performance)
    8. Methods of collecting Data…..
        • Observations
        • Client satisfaction surveys
        • Focus group interviews
        • Checklist (supervision or home visits)
        • Spot-checks
        • Periodic assessments of outcomes for sample of OVC
        • Conduct program evaluation (baseline, mid-term and end-line surveys)
    9. Tools…..
        • Home visit forms
        • Supervision checklist
        • Survey questionnaires
        • Child Status Index (CSI) Assessment – OUTCOMES
        • which can also gives data on outputs:
          • What services child received
          • Frequency and source of support
          • OVC needs and outcomes in each domain
    10. Example – PC3 Program Ethiopia, used the CSI to monitor the effects of QL Improvement
      • 575 Tier III partners & 5 international partners (TI)
      • Developed service quality standards to achieve set Goals (see Child Status Index)
      • Conducted CSI assessments 3 times 6-months apart.
      • A sample of 3,000 OVC were assessed in the 3 waves
      • Results show improvement in all domains except Food & Nutrition which declined.
      • We can say – QL improvement is associated with better outcomes
    11. Results – PC3 - CSI Assessment
      • Mean scores 12 indicators during the three assessments Domains
      • Jan-08 Jun-08 Mar-09 Domain Average
      • 1 Food security 2.73 2.7 2.71 2.71
      • 2 Nutrition& growth 2.88 2.89 2.89 2.89
      • 3 Shelter 2.8 2.78 2.83 2.80
      • 4 Care 2.89 2.95 3.02 2.95
      • 5 Abuse and exploitation 3.18 3.25 3.28 3.24
      • 6 Legal protection 3.16 3.23 3.28 3.22
      • 7 Wellness 3.09 3.1 3.2 3.13
      • 8 Health care services 2.92 3 3.1 3.01
      • 9 Social behavior 3.04 3.08 3.16 3.09
      • 10 Emotional health 3.16 3.23 3.27 3.22
      • 11 Performance 2.92 2.94 3.03 2.96
      • 12 Education & work 2.96 3.05 3.1 3.04
    12. Conclusion
      • Define service quality standards
      • Monitoring Steps:
        • Ensure all essential actions for each domain are taken (use checklist)
        • Progress in implementing the essential actions (# done)
        • Outputs: Number of children reached with improved services (# OVC)
        • Monitor outcome progress – periodic CSI assessments
    13. Thank You!!

    + MEASURE  EvaluationMEASURE Evaluation, 5 months ago

    custom

    213 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 213
      • 212 on SlideShare
      • 1 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds
    • 1 views on http://www.cpc.unc.edu

    more

    All embeds
    • 1 views on http://www.cpc.unc.edu

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories