Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Furbish Company
Furbish Company
Furbish Company
Furbish Company
Furbish Company
Furbish Company
Furbish Company
Furbish Company
Furbish Company
Furbish Company
Furbish Company
Furbish Company
Furbish Company
Furbish Company
Furbish Company
Furbish Company
Furbish Company
Furbish Company
Furbish Company
Furbish Company
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Furbish Company

398

Published on

"SmartSlope: Living Retaining Walls"

"SmartSlope: Living Retaining Walls"

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
398
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Not just shorelines, but streams and creeks also. All slope stabilization and retaining walls in Chesapeake Bay watershed.
  • Bulkheads and hard structures increase nearshore erosion- Over 300 miles of MD shoreline hardened 1978 – 1997Sediment in the Chesapeake Bay and Management Issues: Tidal Erosion ProcessesTidal Sediment Control Task Force of the Sediment Workgroup of the Chesapeake Bay Program Nutrient SubcommitteeMay 2005
  • System designed for:Geographic scalabilityLow capital cost to produceLower carbon footprint (less concrete; less transportation)Larger planting pocket
  • Recipient of Chesapeake Bay Seed Capital Funding with endorsement of Md. Dept Natural Resources
  • These walls get engineered in similar manner to any other retaining wall and/or slope stabilization system.
  • Erosion wasn’t an issue here, but property integrity and building foundation was.In addressing structural issues – habitat created, nutrient uptake increased.
  • Plant selection in waterfront condition may be dictated by local authorities. In this picture, Md Dept Natural Resources and Critical Areas Commission specified native, non-invasive wetland plant varieties and asked that no weeding occur so that nature would restore this slope on its own.Erosion completely eliminated. Living/soft shoreline created. Habitat created. Nutrient uptake ?
  • Approximately 5M sf of retaining wall installed annually in metro Baltimore/Washington markets.How much along shorelines?
  • In commercial settings, sedum varieties are often selected because they do well in compromised soil conditions and require little maintenance from year to year. Similar reasoning behind the preference for sedum for living roofs. The larger leafed or draping sedum varieties are more likely to cover the modules. Pictured here is Sedum kamtschaticum.
  • This DOT slope was hydroseeding with native, non-invasives chosen for low maintenance and “no mow” characteristics.
  • Transcript

    • 1. Michael Furbish
      CEO
      Smart Slope, LLC
    • 2. Problem: Erosion, Sediment, Nutrient
      260 acres MD tidal shoreline lost to erosion annually =
      4.7M cubic yards of sediment =
      SAV habitat compromised by degraded water quality
    • 3. Streams & Creeks
      Maiden’s Choice Run Baltimore, MD
    • 4. Property Value
    • 5. Compromised Structures
    • 6. Traditional approaches address stabilization; not ecosystem
    • 7. Smart Slope
      Vegetated Stabilization System
    • 8.
    • 9.
    • 10.
    • 11. South RiverAnne Arundel County
    • 12. Magothy RiverAnne Arundel County
    • 13. South RiverAnne Arundel County
    • 14. Competition
      Soft Slope Systems
      Hard Structures
      Smart Slope combines attributes of both
    • 15. Residential
    • 16. Commercial
    • 17. DOT
    • 18. Benefits5M sf SRW installed annually15 miles hardened shoreline annually
      Sediment
      Nutrient Uptake
      100% erosion eliminated
      Sediment in near shore mitigated
      % shoreline/streambed unknown
      Associated with runoff reduction
      Additional biofiltration capacity
      Beneficial impact approximated thus far; research required.
    • 19. Potential SWM Retention/Treatment
      Requires R&D with Civil and Structural Engineering
    • 20. Thank you

    ×