Geo-annotations in Semantic Digital Libraries

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Notes on slide 1

    Welcome information My name is Maciej Dabrowski, I am a PhD Researcher at DERI Galway I work in the MarcOnt Initiative which aims on building tools for collaboriative development of ontologies.

    1 Favorite

    Geo-annotations in Semantic Digital Libraries - Presentation Transcript

    1. Geo-annotations in Semantic Digital Libraries Geospatial Knowledge Infrastructures Workshop Maciej Dąbrowski , Sebastian Ryszard Kruk Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Galway maciej . dabrowski @deri.org
    2. About us
      • Sebastian Kruk
      • Lead researcher
      • Semantic Digital Libraries
      • Social Web
      • Semantic Search and Browsing
      • [email_address]
      • Maciej Dąbrowski
      • PhD student, project manager
      • Collaboration
      • Human-Computer Interaction
      • Visualizations of tagging
      • [email_address]
    3. DERI Galway – Mission
      • DERI Galway’s Mission is “to exploit semantics for
          • People
          • Organisations
          • Systems
      • to collaborate and interoperate on a global scale”
    4. DERI – Project Partners IFOMIS
    5. Social semantic information spaces: Semantic (Web 2.0) Web 2.0 and social software
    6. Semantic Web and Web Services Static WWW URI, HTML, HTTP Semantic Web RDF, RDF(S), OWL Dynamic Web Services UDDI, WSDL, SOAP Intelligent Web Services
        • Bringing the web to its full potential
    7. Semantic Web Foodchain Semantically Interlinking Online Semantic Web Search Engine: Multi-Faceted Metadata Browsing Social Semantic Collaborative Filtering Creating Metadata Searching Metadata Navigating Metadata Locally Sharing Metadata Globally Sharing and Deploying of Metadata Social Semantic Desktop SALT – Semantic Annotated LaTex Dynamics & Versioning DINO Dynamics, INtegration, Ontologies JeromeDL MarcOnt Multi- Bee Brows e notitio.us Foaf-Realm Didaskon
    8. Outline
      • Motivation
      • Ontologies in the world of digital libraries
      • JeromeDL – Social Semantic Digital Library
      • MarcOnt – Collaborative ontology development
      • Geo-tagging
    9. Motivation
      • World of Digital Libraries
      • Identified Problems:
      • Interoperability
      • Format translation
      • Multiple data formats in DL:
      • How to support them?
      • How to translate between them?
      • Who should create mappings?
    10. Real-life problems – user’s expectations
      • Searching:
      • Effective and Accurate
      • We want correct and fast answers!!
      • Intuitive and Simple
      • Asking questions should be easy.
      • Meaning
      • Jaguar – a car or an animal?
      • Reasoning
      • Give me articles written by students of X in Galway?
      • Identified problems:
      • Intuitive interface for asking complex querries
    11. Real-life problems - summary
      • Digital Libraries should provide:
      • Interoperability
      • Support for many (legacy) formats
      • Complex search features
      • Intuitive interfaces
    12. Yesterday’s world of digital content
      • Digital library
        • Database and archive (storage)
        • Digital bibliographic descriptions (metadata)
        • Full-text search (interface)
      • Pros:
        • Content accessible online
        • Federations of libraries – visit less places
      • Cons:
        • Lonely user
        • No one to talk to, we need to find the right keywords, what if we do not know them (“man without an ear” paintings example)
        • Still many problems with interconnecting other sources, incl. libraries
      6 Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
    13. Today of interconnected, social media
      • Social Semantic Information Spaces
        • Semantic description (interconnected metadata)
        • Annotations provided by users (social metadata)
        • Collaborative search and browsing (interface)
      • Features
        • Search and browsing based on semantics empowers users
        • Users contribute to the classification process
        • Users can understand community driven annotations
        • Users enhance digital content using blogs, wikis on the side
        • Library can interact with other Internet services
      7 Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
    14. JeromeDL - Properties
      • JeromeDL is the social semantic digital library that provides
        • Integrated social networking with user profiling.
        • Enhanced personalized search facility.
        • Interconnects meaningful description of resources with social media.
        • Extensible access control based on social networks.
        • Collaborative browsing and filtering.
        • Dynamic collections.
        • Integration with Web 2.0 services.
      Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
    15. Metadata and Services in JeromeDL Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
    16. Creating Semantics
      • Each resource is described with:
        • structure annotations - chapters, media parts, attachments
        • basic bibliographic annotations
        • knowledge organization systems - keywords, categories
        • social annotations (soft semantics)
        • Geotags
      • Resource can be annotated with hard semantics during the uploading process
      Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
    17. Exposing Semantic Annotations
    18. Ontologies in JeromeDL
    19. Search based on semantics
      • Natural language templates
        • allows to perform complex queries using natural language
        • can be created and modified based on the needs of users
        • easily internationalized
      • Semantic Query Expansion (alpha)
        • refines query based on current context
        • extensible context definition: user profile, history of queries, current query, etc.
      Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
    20. Access to semantics
      • Exposing underlying semantics
        • rendering RDF in various flavors
        • exposing semantics in JSON and SIOC
        • syndication feeds (RSS)
      • Querying semantic database
        • RDF query endpoint
        • OAI-PMH (beta)
      • Delivering metadata to other services
        • MarcOnt Mediation Services
      Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
    21. Beyond JeromeDL - connecting to Web 2.0
      • Other Web 2.0 services can easily hook up to information and services provided by JeromeDL
      • Example - notitio.us
        • aggregates semantics from different sources, including JeromeDL
        • involves users in providing more annotations
        • exposes content to other services, such as Learning Management Systems
        • contains components familiar from JeromeDL
      Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
    22. Browsing on semantics
      • Exhibit (SIMILE, MIT)
        • powerful faceted filtering
        • rendering related dates on timeline
        • rendering related places on google maps
      • MultiBeeBrowse
        • collaborative browsing
        • allows to perform complex browsing operations
        • user can overview browsing context and look up browsing history
        • search, browse, filter ...
        • Keyword, RDF querry
      Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
    23. Exhibit
    24. Multi-Bee Browse
    25. Conclusions
      • JeromeDL delivers a set of components that enables semantic web technology
      • It enhances users experience through the social interactions
      • It uses semantics existing on the web
      • It delivers semantics for other services
      Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
      • JeromeDL brings Semantic Web and Online Communities to the Digital Libraries
      • as the Digital Library on Social Semantic Information Spaces
      • http://www.jeromedl.org/
      • http://wiki.jeromedl.org/
      • Sebastian Ryszard Kruk
      • DERI, NUI Galway, Ireland
      • [email_address]
    26. MarcOnt Initiative
      • Motivation:
      • Build a bibliographic ontology for
      • the Jerome Digital Library
      • MarcOnt Initiative goals:
      • Deliver a set of tools for
      • collaborative ontology
      • development
      • Create a community of domain expert
      • Enable mediation between formats (MMS)
    27. MarcOnt Ontology
      • Central point of MarcOnt Initiative
      • Translation and mediation format
      • Continuous collaborative ontology improvement
      • Knowledge from the domain experts
      • Community influence and evaluation
    28. MarcOnt Ontology
      • Goals:
      • Capture concepts from the legacy bibliographic formats
        • MARC21, Bibtex, Dublin Core
        • Lattes, ...
      • Create a uniform bibliographic description format for digital libraries.
      • Enable the use of Semantic Web technologies (eg. reasoning) to improve capabilities of digital libraries
      • Improve interoperability
    29. Format Translation Scenario
      • Author:
      • John Smith
      • Date of Birth:
      • 1956-10-15
      • Date of death:
      • 2004-09-10
      Author: John Smith Date of Birth: ?? Date of death: ?? Author: John Smith Date of Birth: ?? Date of death: ?? Author: John Smith Date of Birth: ?? Date of death: ?? Dublin Core
    30. Format Translation Scenario
      • Author:
      • John Smith
      • Date of Birth:
      • 1956-10-15
      • Date of death:
      • 2004-09-10
      Author: John Smith Date of Birth: ?? Date of death: ?? Author: John Smith Date of Birth: ?? Date of death: ?? Author: John Smith Date of Birth: 1956-10-15 Date of death: 2004-09-10 RDF Storage Dublin Core Author: John Smith Date of Birth: 1956-10-15 Date of death: 2004-09-10 Author: John Smith Date of Birth: 1956-10-15 Date of death: 2004-09-10
    31. MarcOnt Tools
      • MarcOnt Initiative involves development of tools:
        • MarcOnt Mediation Services (MMS) – allows users to retrieve the description of the given bibliographic resource in multiple formats
        • RDF Translator – tool for RDF data translation between formats using the set of given mapping rules
        • Rulegenerator – allows defining mapping (translation) rules between concepts from different ontologies.
        • MarcOnt Portal – enabling collaborative ontology development
    32. MarcOnt Mediation Services
    33. MarcOnt Mediation Services
      • Format translation
      Interoperability MarcOnt Mediation Services RDF Translator
    34. Rulegenerator – a tool for mapping rules creation
    35. MarcOnt Portal – ontology lifecycle
      • Collaborative ontology development.
      • Portal provides:
      • Suggestions
      • Annotations
      • Versioning
      • Ontology editor
    36. MarcOnt Portal
      • Goals
        • Deliver set of tools for domain experts enabling ontology development
        • Support collaborative ontology development process
      • Requirements
        • Easy access (no installation)
        • Intuitive interface
        • Ontology versioning
        • Ontology visualizations
        • Ontology editing
    37. MarcOnt Portal - architecture
    38. MarcOnt Portal - features
      • On-line ontology editing
      • Visualization of ontologies
    39. MarcOnt Portal - features
      • Comparing versions of ontologies
    40. MarcOnt Initiative Roadmap
      • Lattes – CV platform used in Brasil
      • Ontology visualisation and graphical edition
      • User profiling
      • MarcOntX agent – automatic integration of concepts from Digital Libraries
    41. MarcOnt Initiative summary
      • MarcOnt Initiative goals:
      • Create a framework for collaborative ontology development
      • Provide domain experts with tools to share their knowledge
      • Offer tools for data mediation between different data formats
      • Develop MarcOnt bibliographic ontology
      • Create a community of users (domain experts)
    42. MarcOnt Initiative references:
      • http://www.marcont.org/
      • http ://mms.marcont.org/
      • http://rdft.marcont.org/
      • http://library.deri.ie/
    43. Geotagging
      • Geotagging ( Geocoding ) is the process of adding geographical identification metadata to various media such as websites, RSS feeds, or images. This data usually consists of latitude and longitude coordinates , though it can also include altitude and place names
      • Geocoding also refers to the process of taking non-coordinate based geographical identifiers, such as a postal address, and assigning geographic coordinates to them (or vice versa).
    44. Geotags
    45. Examples
      • Geo-tags
        • geotagged
        • geo:lat=51.483387
        • geo:lon=-3.169792
      • Geo-Metatags
        • <meta name=&quot;geo.placename&quot; content=&quot;Cardiff, Cardiff, UK&quot; />
        • <meta name=&quot;geo.position&quot; content=&quot;51.483387;-3.169792&quot; />
        • <meta name=&quot;geo.region&quot; content=&quot;GB-Wales&quot; />
        • <meta name=&quot;ICBM&quot; content=&quot;51.483387, -3.169792&quot; />
    46. Flickr
    47. Exhibit
    48. Why geo-tagging?
      • Geotagging can help users find a wide variety of location-specific information.
        • find images taken near a given location by entering latitude and longitude coordinates into a Geotagging-enabled image search engine.
        • n ews
        • w ebsites
        • other resources.
      • Determine the localisation of a given „concept” in the scene
        • http:// copernicus.corrib.org/
    49. Copernicus in action
    50. Summary
      • Semantics can bring digital libraries to a new level of providing services.
      • There is a need for usable and community based appication that would allow annotations (Semantic Web + Web 2.0).
      • Search and browsing services are crucial from the user’s perspective.
      • References:
        • http://jeromedl.org/
        • http://marcont.org/
        • http://copernicus.corrib.org/
        • http:// wiki.corrib.org/

    + mdabrowskimdabrowski, 2 years ago

    custom

    1020 views, 1 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Presentation given at the Geospatial Knowledge Infr more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 1020
      • 1020 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 24
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories