• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Poster druid maria kapsali 3

Poster druid maria kapsali 3






Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Poster druid maria kapsali 3 Poster druid maria kapsali 3 Presentation Transcript

    • Project
      Policy instruments
      Tensions in the Boundary
      • Participation rules
      • Transnational collaboration – Validation of markets or deployment in markets through a venture
      • Deployment objective lost in evaluations
      • Negotiation is mainly budget cutting
      • Evaluation procedures not set up to deal with project change
      • Institutional void Lack of infrastructural cohesion
      Implementation rationale ->
      • Continuous and systematic controlling through monitoring –measurement procedures and participation rules
      Boundary Management
      • Project manager focuses on stage management
      • The role is that of ambassador and scout instead of task coordinator and guard
      • Cannot negotiate much + Participation rules – project manager ends up doing admin work
      • The Project Manager cannot buffer his team and is too busy to bring up boundaries
      • Instead the project manager is adjusting measurement Systems and aligning with agendas
      Project Management Tasks
      Planning: formal, Work Breakdown packages
      Communication: formal through the Policy-project boundary and distant working with partners
      Task control and coordination: Low
      Operational Change
      The boundary role dominates the inner- boundary-leader role of the project manager
      Managing relations becomes the main project manager activity, the Project Manager is marginalized and loses control over participant’s focus and tasks
      Relational stability vs operational flexibility
      Tension between the Boundary and the Project Manager roles
      Implementation design: evaluation instruments
      Task requirements little flexibility no change slack
      Implementation instruments: Top-down rigorous controls on management process (efficiency)
      Manage operational change
      Relations in their networks
      Leadership – internal relations
      Strategic Goal
      Dr. Maria Kapsali
      Research Associate
      Research theme F - Projects, Networks and Ecologies
      Relating in project networks and innovation systems
      Relating in theory
      The findings
      • Systemic relations are not defined and conceptualized in both project and Innovation Systems literatures
      • We need to map the dynamic interactions and their causality in Innovation Systems relating
      Question: WHY TO STUDY THIS?
      • Because the lack of explanation of the dynamic interactions between actors in an Innovation System severely limits us from designing effective policy implementation instruments
      Question: HOW TO STUDY THIS?
      • By creating a blueprint – relational map to describe the dynamic interaction between policy implementation and projects in an Innovation System
      • To show causality in this dynamic interaction
      Literature says:
      Two types of literature: Triple Helix (in Innovation Systems) and project networks.
      In the Triple Helix the boundaries of the actors blur and fuse, there is migration of production activities and role substitution that leads to changes in the actors’ internal roles and activities
      This leads to mixed ways of organizing and change in the structures of actors
      The project networks theory advocates that project networks are temporary, dominated by a variety of logics, identities, values and loyalties that create ecologies with different nodes of transacting
      Their linkages are fluid and network structures defined by project activities, dynamic interactions and institutional dependencies
      Tension between relational flexibility and operational stability – operations need to be more flexible for relations to be more stable (standardize expectations and create swift trust) to solve the problem of institutional embeddedness
      Project management methodologies are designed to make project processes and activities predictable tl be managed in a reductionist way
      • 14 EU FP5 eTENand ISTs healthcare technology projects.
      1. First, that the management of operational change in project activities was not effective
      3. Third, the level of openness to other boundary relationships within the projects networks were low...
      Main finding: systemic relations were dominated by controlling-evaluation processes, which inhibited flexibility in managerial decision making and action. The three main findings were:
      Policy implementation instruments confine managerial action and choice in hard-closed boundaries
      The results
      2. Second, the management of internal relationships-coordination within the project group was weak..
      Managing operational change was weak
      Leader’s role was weakened – sponsor boundary management takes precedence
      Focus on policy-project boundary management
      The causal flowchart tracing the causality in the relational ties between policy-project in the EU innovation system.
      A detailed relational map of the interactive dynamics between policy and projects.