Test Strategy Utilising Mc Useful Tools - Presentation Transcript
Test Strategy
“ Layer” the project
Identify the components in each “layer”
Identify the test basis
Draw up a Dependency matrix
Formulate a testing “Big Picture”
Test Packs
Summarising and going forward ….
“ Layer” the project
Integration services runs on (currently) 3 Biztalk platforms: IS2000 (PoS), IS2002 (ISGM) and IS2004
Each platform contains various abstract layers:
Service layer
Application layer
Database layer
Biztalk layer
Queue
ReceiveFunctions
Adapters
Orchestrations
MessageBoxes
ServerHosts
Test Environment
Components in each layer
Service layer
IS01, IS02, IS03, IS04, BP01, BP02 etc.
Application layer
RuleExec, Janus Web, HOPPA etc.
Database layer
NDTRefData, Alerter, HAT etc.
Biztalk layer
Queue - Workqueue, Retry, Scheduled etc.
ReceiveFunctions - Failed Messages, Receiver
Adapters - FTP, HTTP, SOAP etc.
Orchestrations – BP01, BP02 etc.
MessageBoxes – MsgBox DB, BAM archive etc.
ServerHosts – Orchestration host, Tracking host, SendHost adapters etc.
Test Environment
DEV, Systest 1, Systest 2, CATE 1, CATE 2, little CATE etc.
Test basis N
This is the documentation that supplies the Expectations , Requirements and Expected Results for ANY given piece of testing effort
Prime source of these here is the SUMMIT methodology deliverables – i.e. Project Charter, System Prospectus, System Delivery Spec (SDS), Tech System Design (TSD), Tech Procedure Development (TPD) etc.
Test basis should (ideally) consist of SIGNED-OFF DOCUMENTATION ONLY. However – real-world here and it may include draft docs but increased risk of inaccurate Requirements and/or Expected Results
All pertinent test basis documents collated as “ KeyDocs ” and are secured into Quality Center
Dependency matrix N
This matrix will highlight the implicit and explicit relationship between IS components on each abstract layer
It is used for impact analysis and, hence, to identify likely candidates for regression testing here in IS
Where change is known to have occurred to one component in the abstract layer model, the reader can quickly follow the implicit and explicit relationships to other components that are identified in this matrix. As the reader navigates through the matrix, further likely regression test candidates (and hence Test Packs) are identified
Change to one particular component may involve regression testing “most” of IS
Testing Big Picture N
This is, in essence, a amalgamation of all of the useful diagrams identified as part of the test basis
This model offers a tabular view of the testing and will involve the decomposition of those diagrams in the KeyDocs repository
Data from the diagrams is dropped into a two-dimensional table and the information from the diagram (Names in boxes, names against lines, where the lines come from, where the lines go to etc) is then accessible AND, more importantly, reusable from a testing perspective
Impact analysis is greatly facilitated by using this Big Picture…You can not only prove the Dependency matrix – which means you can accurately describe what related, regression tests need to be run but you also have a pictorial view of everything testing. INVALUABLE
Test Packs N
The management will usually have a view at what level of granularity a Test Packs should be designed. Integration Services (IS) have chosen “layers” within platform. i.e ISGM Biztalk, or IS2004 Database, or IS01 service etc.
The FEWER Test Packs you choose to have, the MORE has to go into each Test Pack. This increases complexity, which increases the chance of failure in a Test Pack, BUT the MORE Test Packs you have, the more resources required to create, modify, prepare and execute them!
If you “spread the load” by having more Test Packs (higher level of granularity), then you have a more agile way of testing change BECAUSE you wont need to regression test ALL Test Packs.
Summarising N
Test Packs are used to regression test
KeyDocs repository contains the (signed-off and master) test basis documentation which will facilitate proof of test coverage (i.e. HAVE we covered everything in the documentation?)
Dependency matrix helps you to decide (accurately when used in conjunction with the Big Picture) exactly what else is candidate for test
Big Picture gives pictorial representation of ALL things testing on a project/programme. The data/information contained therein is ultimately reusable because it also exists in two-dimensional form!
If all this seems VERY COMPLEX, then wait till something CHANGES . i.e. documentation or process. THEN it gets complex because you don’t know what impact that change will have!!
The beauty of the above is that I have tools that will automatically decompose documents/diagrams so “change” merely means re-extraction of the data from the changed documents or diagrams (text from documents or text/context information from diagrams) into KeyDocs or Big Picture ……. Next slide elaborates more
… .. But this is all talking the talk, now lets walk the walk
Walk the walk N
DocIndex provides the engine that drives the creation of the KeyDocs (test coverage and Expected Results).
InternetMiner provides the engine that assists the creation of KeyDocs and operates on Intranet/internet pages and hyperlinks to extract similar information to DocIndex. This is more an ancillary tool that complements DocIndex and is useful for gaining insight into specific areas of expertise.
VisioDecompositer provides the engine that drives diagram information (process flow and data flow) into the Big Picture.
Here’s some screen shots to give you a better flavour….
DocIndex 1 of 10 N
DocIndex (viewer) main menu
DocIndex 2 of 10
KeyDocs main menu
DocIndex 3 of 10
Display a selectable list of KeyDocs
DocIndex 4 of 10
Now display a summarised list of the sections in the selected KeyDoc
DocIndex 5 of 10
Select one of the sections in the document and the text is displayed
DocIndex 6 of 10
The power of this tool lies in the fact that ALL relevant project/programme-level documentation is captured into the tool
DocIndex 7 of 10
The contents of all of the KeyDocs are stored in two tables: tblSectionHeaders – which is a summarised “table of contents” for a KeyDoc
DocIndex 8 of 10
and File_Decomposition – which is textual body for all KeyDocs
DocIndex 9 of 10
There is a keyword/key phrase Search facility for the group of KeyDocs, which allows the user to quickly become acquainted with “project specific” terminology
DocIndex 10 of 10
and the reader can, very quickly, become acquainted with the context in which the specific search terms are used.
InternetMiner 1 of 10 N
InternetMiner main menu
InternetMiner 2 of 10
Enter a suitably relevant URL - in this case, found by doing a “biztalk performance test” search string in Google UK
InternetMiner 3 of 10
And the page(s) are decomposed into InternetMiner , in much the same way as DocIndex
InternetMiner 4 of 10
The list of decomposed URLs can be viewed (and refreshed either manually or automatically) so that the information contained therein is always up to date
InternetMiner 5 of 10
And the content from ALL of the decomposed URLs can be viewed at a glance
InternetMiner 6 of 10
And relevant search keywords or key phrases can be entered
InternetMiner 7 of 10
And the result be displayed (in various forms) - so that the user can see, contextually, where the search term is used
InternetMiner 8 of 10
Alternative views of the results (and search strings) can be made
InternetMiner 9 of 10
And you can quickly build up a picture of the various (in this case technical Biztalk) phrases
InternetMiner 10 of 10
And how they relate to the overall topic (Biztalk Performance testing)
VisioDecompositer 1 of 2 N
VisioDecompositer takes a straightforward Visio diagram…..
VisioDecompositer 2 of 2 N
And converts it into two-dimensional information that can be “mapped” into test cases or test scripts quite easily
This presentation illustrates DocIndex, InternetMin more
This presentation illustrates DocIndex, InternetMiner and VisioDecompositer - my 3 proprietary test tools - and walks the user through how they are used effectively.
The tools are presented in the context of a Test Strategy and the emphasis is on HOW the tools are used and the rationale behind the esign of the tools.
View this presentation with SPEAKERS NOTES ON. less
0 comments
Post a comment