0
This project is funded by the European Commission under the eContentplus programme, a multiannual programme to make digita...
Discovery Project Research Cycle
Discovery Project
Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) Discovery Project <ul><li>Early and Often </li></ul><ul><li>Findability needs to be built...
Discovery Project
Discovery Project Michele Barbera <barbera@netseven.it> <ul><li>Easily indexed by Web search engines </li></ul><ul><li>Sem...
Discovery Project Michele Barbera <barbera@netseven.it>
Discovery Project Michele Barbera <barbera@netseven.it>
Discovery Project Michele Barbera <barbera@netseven.it>
Discovery Project Well served by SEO
Discovery Project Not well served
Discovery Project
Discovery Project Europeana Metadata
Discovery Project
This project is funded by the European Commission under the eContentplus programme, a multiannual programme to make digita...
Discovery Project
Discovery Project Well served by catalogues
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Interoperability And Impact in the Philosource Federation

474

Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
474
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • So if having a good product is the first step, the next is figuring out how to get people to use it. This means going back to the basics and understanding why humanities scholars in general adopt technologies in their working lives and practice. Taking information-seeking as just one example, what I have found over both the course of my research and my work with Discovery is really quite simple--technologies are adopted when they have a real, tangible benefit to practice. For years there has been this myth of humanities scholars as luddites, but the truth is that they are just practical. Scholars don’t reject an electronic catalogue and go back to using the card catalogue because they don’t like technology, but because the technology fails to provide any benefit--it often isn’t faster, or more comprehensive. And if it doesn’t save someone time or work, and they can’t do anything with it that they couldn’t be done with a sheet of paper and a pen, why should they use it?
  • So if having a good product is the first step, the next is figuring out how to get people to use it. This means going back to the basics and understanding why humanities scholars in general adopt technologies in their working lives and practice. Taking information-seeking as just one example, what I have found over both the course of my research and my work with Discovery is really quite simple--technologies are adopted when they have a real, tangible benefit to practice. For years there has been this myth of humanities scholars as luddites, but the truth is that they are just practical. Scholars don’t reject an electronic catalogue and go back to using the card catalogue because they don’t like technology, but because the technology fails to provide any benefit--it often isn’t faster, or more comprehensive. And if it doesn’t save someone time or work, and they can’t do anything with it that they couldn’t be done with a sheet of paper and a pen, why should they use it?
  • So if having a good product is the first step, the next is figuring out how to get people to use it. This means going back to the basics and understanding why humanities scholars in general adopt technologies in their working lives and practice. Taking information-seeking as just one example, what I have found over both the course of my research and my work with Discovery is really quite simple--technologies are adopted when they have a real, tangible benefit to practice. For years there has been this myth of humanities scholars as luddites, but the truth is that they are just practical. Scholars don’t reject an electronic catalogue and go back to using the card catalogue because they don’t like technology, but because the technology fails to provide any benefit--it often isn’t faster, or more comprehensive. And if it doesn’t save someone time or work, and they can’t do anything with it that they couldn’t be done with a sheet of paper and a pen, why should they use it?
  • So if having a good product is the first step, the next is figuring out how to get people to use it. This means going back to the basics and understanding why humanities scholars in general adopt technologies in their working lives and practice. Taking information-seeking as just one example, what I have found over both the course of my research and my work with Discovery is really quite simple--technologies are adopted when they have a real, tangible benefit to practice. For years there has been this myth of humanities scholars as luddites, but the truth is that they are just practical. Scholars don’t reject an electronic catalogue and go back to using the card catalogue because they don’t like technology, but because the technology fails to provide any benefit--it often isn’t faster, or more comprehensive. And if it doesn’t save someone time or work, and they can’t do anything with it that they couldn’t be done with a sheet of paper and a pen, why should they use it?
  • So if having a good product is the first step, the next is figuring out how to get people to use it. This means going back to the basics and understanding why humanities scholars in general adopt technologies in their working lives and practice. Taking information-seeking as just one example, what I have found over both the course of my research and my work with Discovery is really quite simple--technologies are adopted when they have a real, tangible benefit to practice. For years there has been this myth of humanities scholars as luddites, but the truth is that they are just practical. Scholars don’t reject an electronic catalogue and go back to using the card catalogue because they don’t like technology, but because the technology fails to provide any benefit--it often isn’t faster, or more comprehensive. And if it doesn’t save someone time or work, and they can’t do anything with it that they couldn’t be done with a sheet of paper and a pen, why should they use it?
  • So if having a good product is the first step, the next is figuring out how to get people to use it. This means going back to the basics and understanding why humanities scholars in general adopt technologies in their working lives and practice. Taking information-seeking as just one example, what I have found over both the course of my research and my work with Discovery is really quite simple--technologies are adopted when they have a real, tangible benefit to practice. For years there has been this myth of humanities scholars as luddites, but the truth is that they are just practical. Scholars don’t reject an electronic catalogue and go back to using the card catalogue because they don’t like technology, but because the technology fails to provide any benefit--it often isn’t faster, or more comprehensive. And if it doesn’t save someone time or work, and they can’t do anything with it that they couldn’t be done with a sheet of paper and a pen, why should they use it?
  • So if having a good product is the first step, the next is figuring out how to get people to use it. This means going back to the basics and understanding why humanities scholars in general adopt technologies in their working lives and practice. Taking information-seeking as just one example, what I have found over both the course of my research and my work with Discovery is really quite simple--technologies are adopted when they have a real, tangible benefit to practice. For years there has been this myth of humanities scholars as luddites, but the truth is that they are just practical. Scholars don’t reject an electronic catalogue and go back to using the card catalogue because they don’t like technology, but because the technology fails to provide any benefit--it often isn’t faster, or more comprehensive. And if it doesn’t save someone time or work, and they can’t do anything with it that they couldn’t be done with a sheet of paper and a pen, why should they use it?
  • So if having a good product is the first step, the next is figuring out how to get people to use it. This means going back to the basics and understanding why humanities scholars in general adopt technologies in their working lives and practice. Taking information-seeking as just one example, what I have found over both the course of my research and my work with Discovery is really quite simple--technologies are adopted when they have a real, tangible benefit to practice. For years there has been this myth of humanities scholars as luddites, but the truth is that they are just practical. Scholars don’t reject an electronic catalogue and go back to using the card catalogue because they don’t like technology, but because the technology fails to provide any benefit--it often isn’t faster, or more comprehensive. And if it doesn’t save someone time or work, and they can’t do anything with it that they couldn’t be done with a sheet of paper and a pen, why should they use it?
  • Transcript of "Interoperability And Impact in the Philosource Federation"

    1. 1. This project is funded by the European Commission under the eContentplus programme, a multiannual programme to make digital content in Europe more accessible, usable and exploitable. Design: Michele Barbera Content: Christine Madsen Interoperability and Impact of the Philosource Federation Christine Madsen CNRS Oxford Internet Institute Discovery Project PHILOSOPHY IN THE DIGITAL ERA Read, study, cite and publish in a Semantic Web environment
    2. 2. Discovery Project Research Cycle
    3. 3. Discovery Project
    4. 4. Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) Discovery Project <ul><li>Early and Often </li></ul><ul><li>Findability needs to be built into infrastructure </li></ul>
    5. 5. Discovery Project
    6. 6. Discovery Project Michele Barbera <barbera@netseven.it> <ul><li>Easily indexed by Web search engines </li></ul><ul><li>Semantic Web compatible </li></ul>Philosource Federation
    7. 7. Discovery Project Michele Barbera <barbera@netseven.it>
    8. 8. Discovery Project Michele Barbera <barbera@netseven.it>
    9. 9. Discovery Project Michele Barbera <barbera@netseven.it>
    10. 10. Discovery Project Well served by SEO
    11. 11. Discovery Project Not well served
    12. 12. Discovery Project
    13. 13. Discovery Project Europeana Metadata
    14. 14. Discovery Project
    15. 15. This project is funded by the European Commission under the eContentplus programme, a multiannual programme to make digital content in Europe more accessible, usable and exploitable. Discovery Project Michele Barbera <barbera@netseven.it>
    16. 16. Discovery Project
    17. 17. Discovery Project Well served by catalogues
    1. A particular slide catching your eye?

      Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

    ×