The Effect Of Narrativisation On The Comprehension Of Jury Instructions

  • 663 views
Uploaded on

Sally Nelson - University of Cardiff

Sally Nelson - University of Cardiff

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
663
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. The Effect of Narrativisation on the Comprehension of Jury Instructions Sally Nelson Forensic Linguistics, CLCR, Cardiff University
  • 2. Narrativisation of judicial directions
    • ‘ Narrativisation’ Hypothesis (Heffer, 2005):
    • Juror comprehension improves when judges’ deliver instructions in a ‘narrative’ style which accommodates the reasoning strategies typically used by lay people, compared to a decontextualised ‘legal’ style used by the legally trained.
    US Standardised ‘Pattern’ instructions read verbatim England and Wales Judge’s sum up each case, reviewing the evidence. Vs.
  • 3. Design
    • Three summings-up were drafted, each systematically varying by degree of narrativisation:
    1 Only the legal directions from the Specimen Directions 2 Integrating specific evidence from the case into the Specimen Directions 3 Integrating specific evidence and using narrativising features e.g. vocatives and discourse markers
  • 4.
    • Comprehension assessed by multiple-choice, paraphrase and novel- scenario tests:
  • 5. Mock jurors watched a simulated rape trial prior to receiving one of the three summings-up. Procedure
  • 6. Preliminary findings
  • 7.  
  • 8.  
  • 9.
    • Thanks!
    • [email_address]