Update on ACRL’s
Value of Academic Libraries Initiative
Sunday, June 29, 2014 1:00 – 2:30 p.m.
Las Vegas Convention Center...
(Historic) National Context
National Higher Education Responses
The Road Travelled
Value of Academic Libraries Report
Freely available
http://acrl.org/value
ACRL Plan for Excellence
Value of Academic Libraries
Goal: Academic libraries demonstrate alignment with and impact on
ins...
Value of Academic Libraries Initiative
Keep Up-to-Date
• Value of Academic
Libraries Blog
•Valueography
Outreach &
Colla...
Value of Academic Libraries Initiative
Outreach & Collaboration
Objective: Influence national conversations
and activiti...
Value of Academic Libraries Initiative
Work in Progress
Objective: Develop and deliver responsive professional developme...
Value of Academic Libraries Initiative
Work in Progress
Objective: Leverage existing research to articulate
and promote ...
Writing a paper?
Using library resources increases student success.
Need help
Working on research?
Recommendations
 Define outcomes
 Create or adopt systems for assessment management
 Determine what libraries enables s...
Planning Grant Report
Freely available
http://acrl.org/value
Themes from Summits
Accountability
Unified approach
Student learning/success
Evidence-based
Recommendation 1
Library Value → Student Learning and Success:
Increase the profession’s understanding of library value
in...
Recommendation 2
Core VAL Competencies:
Articulate and promote the development of core
assessment competencies related to ...
Recommendation 3
Professional Development:
Create opportunities for librarians to learn how to
initiate and design assessm...
Recommendation 4
Partner and Collaborate:
Expand partnerships and assessment activities
with higher education constituent ...
Recommendation 5
Building Blocks:
Integrate the use of existing ACRL tools with
library value initiatives
Assessment in Action Grant
Assessment in Action Goals
Professional Competencies
Collaborative Relationships
Approaches, Strategies, Practices
AiA Facilitators
Carrie Donovan April Cunningham
Kara MalenfantLisa HinchliffeDeb Gilchrist
Librarian
Leader
Institutional
Researcher/
Assessment
Officer
Faculty
Member
TeamApproach
AiA Team Members
• assessment office
• institutional research
• teaching faculty
• writing center
• information/acad.
tech...
AiA 2014 Institutional Teams
AiA 2014 Institutional Teams
Accreditation:
• 11 MSCHE
• 30 NCA-HLC
• 4 NEASC-CIHE
• 6 NWCCU
• 18 SACS
• 3 WASC-ACSCU
• 1 ...
Community of Practice
1. Defining
Outcome(s)
2. Setting
Criteria
3. Performing
Action(s) &
4. Gathering
Evidence
5. Analyzing
Evidence
6. Planni...
Blended Learning
Action Learning Projects
Sharing Results
http://www.acrl.ala.org/value/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/AiA-poster-guide-ALA-AC-
2014.pdf
Library Factors Examined
• instruction: games, single/multiple session,
course embedded, tutorials
• reference
• physical ...
Variety of Tools/Methods
• survey
• interviews
• focus group(s)
• observation
• pre/post test
• rubric
• student portfolio...
Example Inquiry Questions
• How does our newly revised inquiry-based, blended information literacy
program contribute to a...
Apply for Year 3
• Application available January 2015
• Applications due March 2015
• Notifications April 2015
• Program s...
FYI: Basics of Applying
1. Identify a team:
• one librarian
• minimum two people from other campus units
2. Write two essa...
Future plans
Several proposals have been submitted for possible ACRL
2015 presentations and workshops. We will be sharing
...
Questions?
Comments?
Thank You!
ACRL Value Update 2014, Annual Las Vegas
ACRL Value Update 2014, Annual Las Vegas
ACRL Value Update 2014, Annual Las Vegas
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

ACRL Value Update 2014, Annual Las Vegas

157
-1

Published on

An update on the work of the Value of Academic Libraries committee, presented at a Sunday afternoon forum at ALA Annual Conference in Las Vegas by Lynn Silipigni Connaway and Melissa Bowles-Terry.

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
157
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Projects can examine any type of library factor and are not limited to library instruction. Teams are looking at many library services and programs, like:

    instruction: games, one shot, course embedded, tutorials
    reference
    educational role
    space, physical
    discovery: institutional web, resource guides
    collections
    personnel
  • ACRL Value Update 2014, Annual Las Vegas

    1. 1. Update on ACRL’s Value of Academic Libraries Initiative Sunday, June 29, 2014 1:00 – 2:30 p.m. Las Vegas Convention Center – N255 Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph.D. Chair, ACRL Value of Academic Libraries Committee, 2014-15 Melissa Bowles-Terry Vice-Chair, ACRL Value of Academic Libraries Committee, 2014-15
    2. 2. (Historic) National Context
    3. 3. National Higher Education Responses
    4. 4. The Road Travelled
    5. 5. Value of Academic Libraries Report Freely available http://acrl.org/value
    6. 6. ACRL Plan for Excellence Value of Academic Libraries Goal: Academic libraries demonstrate alignment with and impact on institutional outcomes. Objectives: • Leverage existing research to articulate and promote the value of academic and research libraries. • Undertake and support new research that builds on the research agenda in The Value of Academic Libraries: A Comprehensive Review and Report. • Influence national conversations and activities focused on the value of higher education. • Develop and deliver responsive professional development programs that build the skills and capacity for leadership and local data- informed and evidence-based advocacy.
    7. 7. Value of Academic Libraries Initiative Keep Up-to-Date • Value of Academic Libraries Blog •Valueography Outreach & Collaboration • Presentations (e.g. CNI, LAC, & Northumbria) • ACRL Liaisons Assembly Assessment Management Systems Work in Progress • Librarian Competencies • Research agenda • Library Publicity Posters
    8. 8. Value of Academic Libraries Initiative Outreach & Collaboration Objective: Influence national conversations and activities focused on the value of higher education. Working with ACRL Liaisons to develop talking points – guides prepared for the liaisons to the American Sociological Association, Society for College and University Planning, Modern Language Association, American Anthropological Association; more coming
    9. 9. Value of Academic Libraries Initiative Work in Progress Objective: Develop and deliver responsive professional development programs that build the skills and capacity for leadership and local data- informed and evidence-based advocacy. Task Force on Standards for Proficiencies for Assessment Librarians and Coordinators was formed with the charge: To develop a list of proficiencies required of assessment librarians and other librarians who contribute to assessment programs at their institutions, focusing on broad areas of proficiency rather than a comprehensive list of skills; consider similar documents such as ACRL’s “Standards for Proficiencies for Instruction Librarians and Coordinators” and RUSA’s "Professional Competencies for Reference and User Services Librarians;” outline an approach to assist individuals and organizations in selecting the proficiencies most appropriate for their environment; and follow the standards development requirements in the ACRL Guide to Policies and Procedures.
    10. 10. Value of Academic Libraries Initiative Work in Progress Objective: Leverage existing research to articulate and promote the value of academic and research libraries • Library Publicity Posters Campaign •Provide examples of research that demonstrates the value librarians provide •Customizable to add institution logo •Freely available
    11. 11. Writing a paper? Using library resources increases student success.
    12. 12. Need help
    13. 13. Working on research?
    14. 14. Recommendations  Define outcomes  Create or adopt systems for assessment management  Determine what libraries enables students, faculty, student affairs professionals, administrators and staff to do.  Develop systems to collect data on individual library user behavior, while maintaining privacy.  Record and increase library impact on student enrollment.  Link libraries to improved student retention and graduation rates.  Review course content, readings, reserves, and assignments.  Document and augment library advancement of student experiences, attitudes, and perceptions of quality.  Track and increase library contributions to faculty research productivity.  Contribute to investigate library impact on faculty grant proposals and funding, a means of generating institutional income.  Demonstrate and improve library support of faculty teaching.  Create library assessment plans.  Promote and participate in professional development.  Mobilize library administrators.  Leverage library professional associations.
    15. 15. Planning Grant Report Freely available http://acrl.org/value
    16. 16. Themes from Summits Accountability Unified approach Student learning/success Evidence-based
    17. 17. Recommendation 1 Library Value → Student Learning and Success: Increase the profession’s understanding of library value in relation to various dimensions of student learning and success
    18. 18. Recommendation 2 Core VAL Competencies: Articulate and promote the development of core assessment competencies related to library value
    19. 19. Recommendation 3 Professional Development: Create opportunities for librarians to learn how to initiate and design assessment that demonstrates the library’s contributions to advancing institutional mission and strategic goals
    20. 20. Recommendation 4 Partner and Collaborate: Expand partnerships and assessment activities with higher education constituent groups
    21. 21. Recommendation 5 Building Blocks: Integrate the use of existing ACRL tools with library value initiatives
    22. 22. Assessment in Action Grant
    23. 23. Assessment in Action Goals Professional Competencies Collaborative Relationships Approaches, Strategies, Practices
    24. 24. AiA Facilitators Carrie Donovan April Cunningham Kara MalenfantLisa HinchliffeDeb Gilchrist
    25. 25. Librarian Leader Institutional Researcher/ Assessment Officer Faculty Member TeamApproach
    26. 26. AiA Team Members • assessment office • institutional research • teaching faculty • writing center • information/acad. technology • student affairs • campus administrator • library administrator • other librarian
    27. 27. AiA 2014 Institutional Teams
    28. 28. AiA 2014 Institutional Teams Accreditation: • 11 MSCHE • 30 NCA-HLC • 4 NEASC-CIHE • 6 NWCCU • 18 SACS • 3 WASC-ACSCU • 1 Canadian Type of Institution: • 13 Associate's • 15 Baccalaureate Colleges • 11 Master's Colleges and Universities • 4 Doctoral/Research Universities • 23 Research Universities (high/very high research activity) • 6 Special Focus Institutions (Medical schools, culinary, Theological seminary) • 1 Tribal college
    29. 29. Community of Practice
    30. 30. 1. Defining Outcome(s) 2. Setting Criteria 3. Performing Action(s) & 4. Gathering Evidence 5. Analyzing Evidence 6. Planning Change Cycle of Assessment [focused on] Library Value PLANNING ACTINGREFLECTING SHARING
    31. 31. Blended Learning
    32. 32. Action Learning Projects
    33. 33. Sharing Results http://www.acrl.ala.org/value/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/AiA-poster-guide-ALA-AC- 2014.pdf
    34. 34. Library Factors Examined • instruction: games, single/multiple session, course embedded, tutorials • reference • physical space • discovery: institutional web, resource guides • collections • personnel
    35. 35. Variety of Tools/Methods • survey • interviews • focus group(s) • observation • pre/post test • rubric • student portfolio • research paper/project • other class assignment • test scores • GPA • degree completion rate • retention rate
    36. 36. Example Inquiry Questions • How does our newly revised inquiry-based, blended information literacy program contribute to and enhance student learning? • Do library outreach programs focused on sophomore students improve academic quality and student retention? • To what extent does partnering with the Academic Support Center (to provide tutoring services on the main floor of the Library) increase student success and contribute to campus-wide retention efforts? • What types of faculty-librarian collaborations are most effective in supporting the university’s Quality Enhancement Program: Global Learning for Global Citizenship? • How effective is our discovery system in preparing health care clinicians to access and effectively use evidence/information in their professional practice?
    37. 37. Apply for Year 3 • Application available January 2015 • Applications due March 2015 • Notifications April 2015 • Program starts mid April • Full details at http://acrl.org/value
    38. 38. FYI: Basics of Applying 1. Identify a team: • one librarian • minimum two people from other campus units 2. Write two essays: • team’s project goals • librarian team leader’s goals 3. Secure two statements of support: • library dean/director • chief academic officer
    39. 39. Future plans Several proposals have been submitted for possible ACRL 2015 presentations and workshops. We will be sharing updates on these plans as more information becomes available at the ACRL Blog www.acrl.ala.org/value/
    40. 40. Questions? Comments? Thank You!

    ×