Introduction to Civil Liberties

1,126 views
931 views

Published on

1 Comment
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • 'After being in relationship with Wilson for seven years,he broke up with me, I did everything possible to bring him back but all was in vain, I wanted him back so much because of the love I have for him, I begged him with everything, I made promises but he refused. I explained my problem to someone online and she suggested that I should contact a spell caster that could help me cast a spell to bring him back but I am the type that don't believed in spell, I had no choice than to try it, I meant a spell caster called Dr Zuma zuk and I email him, and he told me there was no problem that everything will be okay before three days, that my ex will return to me before three days, he cast the spell and surprisingly in the second day, it was around 4pm. My ex called me, I was so surprised, I answered the call and all he said was that he was so sorry for everything that happened, that he wanted me to return to him, that he loves me so much. I was so happy and went to him, that was how we started living together happily again. Since then, I have made promise that anybody I know that have a relationship problem, I would be of help to such person by referring him or her to the only real and powerful spell caster who helped me with my own problem and who is different from all the fake ones out there. Anybody could need the help of the spell caster, his email: spiritualherbalisthealing@gmail.com or call him +2349055637784 you can email him if you need his assistance in your relationship or anything. CONTACT HIM NOW FOR SOLUTION TO ALL YOUR PROBLEMS'
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,126
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
47
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
39
Comments
1
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Introduction to Civil Liberties

    1. 1. American Constitutional Law Introduction to Civil Liberties
    2. 2. Source of Rights <ul><li>Constitution </li></ul><ul><li>Bill of Rights </li></ul><ul><li>Federal Law </li></ul><ul><li>State Constitution </li></ul><ul><li>State Law </li></ul><ul><li>Local Law </li></ul>
    3. 3. What Federal Law Adds <ul><li>Constitution only protects people from the government. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>federal law can regulate rights between private individuals. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Court may read constitutional right narrowly </li></ul><ul><ul><li>thus, need laws like Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Americans with Disabilities Act, Civil Rights Act. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>these groups aren't protected adequately by court's reading of the Constitution. </li></ul></ul></ul>
    4. 4. Criminal Procedure <ul><li>Rights we will not be covering in class: </li></ul><ul><li>4 th Amendment – privacy </li></ul><ul><li>5 th Amendment – Due Process </li></ul><ul><li>6 th Amendment – right to counsel & jury </li></ul><ul><li>8 th Amendment – cruel and unusual punishment </li></ul>
    5. 5. Checks on Power <ul><li>Constitution </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Separation of Powers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Checks and Balances </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Bill of Rights </li></ul><ul><ul><li>protects individual rights from tyranny of majority. </li></ul></ul>
    6. 6. Competing Interests <ul><li>Constitution </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Federal v. State governments </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Civil Liberties </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Government (all levels) v. Individual </li></ul></ul>
    7. 7. State Action <ul><li>Liberty (fundamental rights) and Equality (equal protection) rights apply only to government. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Private conduct generally does not have to comply with the Constitution. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Constitution applies to government at all levels </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Federal, State, Local </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>and to actions of its officers </li></ul></ul>
    8. 8. When Does Constitution Apply to Private Actions? <ul><li>13 th Amendment – bans slavery </li></ul><ul><ul><li>only provision that specifically regulates private conduct. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Prohibition was another - 18 th Amendment </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Where private and government conduct are indistinguishable </li></ul><ul><li>Where federal or state law apply constitutional norms to private action. </li></ul>
    9. 9. Is it Government? <ul><li>State Action = Government </li></ul><ul><li>When an entity is part of government </li></ul><ul><ul><li>bodies, agencies, laws, rules, enforcement decisions, etc. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Public Functions Exceptions </li></ul><ul><ul><li>private entity exercises power traditionally exclusively reserved for State. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>The Entanglement Exceptions </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Gov't encourages private action </li></ul></ul>
    10. 10. Application of Bill of Rights to the States <ul><li>Text Doesn't Really Cover This. </li></ul><ul><li>“No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>14 th Amendment </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Has been interpreted to mean Bill of Rights applies to States. </li></ul>
    11. 11. Levels of Scrutiny <ul><li>The test that is applied to determine if the law is constitutional </li></ul><ul><li>Levels </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Rational Basis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Middle Tier </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>intermediate, proportionality </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Strict Scrutiny </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>compelling interest </li></ul></ul></ul>Note – most cases fall under Rational Basis test
    12. 12. Strict Scrutiny <ul><li>Discrimination based upon: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>“Suspect Classes” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Race </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>National Origin </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Religion </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>either under Equal Protection or Establishment Clause analysis </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Interference with fundamental rights </li></ul><ul><ul><li>voting, travel, privacy, speech, access to courts </li></ul></ul>
    13. 13. Strict Scrutiny Test <ul><li>law serves a compelling government purpose </li></ul><ul><li>and is necessary to serve that interest </li></ul><ul><ul><li>least restrictive alternative </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>if there are valid alternatives, then State fails this prong. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>specifically and narrowly tailored </li></ul></ul>
    14. 14. Intermediate Scrutiny <ul><li>Government must have “important” interest. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>lower standard than “compelling” </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Means used must be “substantially related” to the interest. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>lower standard than “necessary” </li></ul></ul>
    15. 15. Applies To <ul><li>Under Equal Protection (discrimination): </li></ul><ul><ul><li>“quasi suspect classes” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Gender </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>legitimacy </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Under Fundamental Rights </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Time, Place and Manner Regulations in Public Forums </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Commercial Speech </li></ul></ul>
    16. 16. Rational Basis <ul><li>Applies to all laws that do not impact a “fundamental right” or a “suspect class” or “quasi-suspect” class. </li></ul><ul><li>Thus, the first question in any case is: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>fundamental right at stake? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>suspect or quasi-suspect class? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>If no to both, then rational basis test. </li></ul></ul>
    17. 17. Rational Basis Test <ul><li>“rationally related to a legitimate government purpose” </li></ul><ul><ul><li>rational relationship = any conceivable legitimate purpose </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>law also must be reasonable way to achieve the stated ends. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>whether the law is “fair” does not play a role in the analysis. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Gives enormous deference to government. </li></ul>
    18. 18. Distinguishing Middle Tier <ul><li>Government objective must be more than just a legitimate goal. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>must be “important” </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Means chosen must be more than simply reasonable way to reach goal. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>must be “substantially related” to the goal. </li></ul></ul>
    19. 19. Plyler v. Doe <ul><li>Which standard is being applied? </li></ul><ul><li>Why? </li></ul><ul><li>Why Equal Protection instead of Due Process? </li></ul>
    20. 20. Levels of Scrutiny EXAMPLES

    ×