• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Seriously Social Surveillance: A Cafe Dana Talk at the Science Museum
 

Seriously Social Surveillance: A Cafe Dana Talk at the Science Museum

on

  • 1,303 views

Seriously Social Surveillance: For the way people increasingly manage, influence and prioritise everyday life…

Seriously Social Surveillance: For the way people increasingly manage, influence and prioritise everyday life…

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,303
Views on SlideShare
1,303
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Seriously Social Surveillance: A Cafe Dana Talk at the Science Museum Seriously Social Surveillance: A Cafe Dana Talk at the Science Museum Presentation Transcript

    • SERIOUSLY SOCIAL SURVEILLANCE Dr Mariann Hardey Café Sci Dana @sciencemuseum Wednesday May 13th 2009
    • SAME DOG, NEW TRICKS NOT a dog, July 1993 Always a dog
    • A JANE DOE
    • ‘SHARE WITH MORE PEOPLE’   Janehas a Friend Request from an ‘old school pal’.   Darren found Jane’s and Polly’s through an ‘easy’ Google name search.   Darren has access to Jane and Polly’s latest pictures on Flickr.
    • SOCIAL NEWS   Janeand colleagues have a meeting with the Head of Department about ‘improper images on Facebook’.   News from big sis Polly comes via Twitter.
    • YOU’RE INVITED!
    • PARTY!
    • JANE LIVES CONSTANTLY CONNECTED   Updates are sent direct to her mobile phone. This means that she is ‘always available’ and ‘constantly connected’.   Jane does not always know when others are reading or retrieving information about her, and this can be ‘an issue’.
    • PEOPLE LIKE JANE   Acutely aware of social actions about their networks e.g. through Twitter, Facebook YouTube, Flickr etc.   Expect to up-to-date social information and engage with others regularly via social media   Take for granted ubiquitous access and being able to get in touch at ‘any time’ with friends   Have an awareness of a distinction between public and private information
    • PEOPLE NOT LIKE JANE   Do not use social media   Do not have a profile on a Social Network Site (SNS)   Do not share information with networks   Are seen as at risk of being a ‘social outcast’
    • A SURVEILLED SENSIBILITY   ‘Opt in’, OR to ‘opt out’.   Constant monitoring   Seek empowerment through social surveillance e.g. as a way to protect and/or promote an individuals social rating = Popular   THUS increasingly we experience a range of surveillance techniques as a single and collaborative phenomenon   Always expected to be aware of others
    • ARE WE BECOMING MORE LIKE JANE?...   Social technology is smaller, broader in scope, more accessible and easier to use.   We are all capable of everyday micro surveillance; of ourselves and our networks…
    • SERIOUSLY SOCIAL SURVEILLANCE
    • I suggest SSS as the way we increasingly manage, influence and prioritise daily life…
    • IN SHORT. WE LIVE LIFE
    • MY SOCIAL SURVEILLANCE I am here: email: Mariann@mariannhardey.net mazphd Maz Hardey Website: http://mariannhardey.googlepages.com/aboutme I write: http://properfacebooketiquette.blogspot.com/