2001~2006 Authors Cited 1993~2000 Journals

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    2001~2006 Authors Cited 1993~2000 Journals - Presentation Transcript

    1. 2001~2006 authors cited 1993~2000 journals
      • 排除沒有任何引用的第一作者,共有 320 位
      • 排除掉還沒有發行的期刊:剩下 11 種: 人社 / 人口 / 台社刊 / 台社研 / 台社學 / 東吳社 / 思與言 / 政大社 / 教社 / 女學 / 調查 --> 形成 320x11 的矩陣
      • 排除重複發表的作者,合併引用次數 --> 變成 228x11 的矩陣
    2. 706 Total Frequencies Journals 35 調查 43 女學 1 教社 18 政大社 47 思與言 34 東吳社 81 台社學 223 台社研 98 台社刊 48 人口 78 人社
    3. The Maximum: 223 ( 台灣社會研究季刊 ) The Minimum: 1 ( 女學學誌 ) Total : 706 The mean of cited:64.18 The mean of citing: 25.21
    4. I tried to give those journals into ranks, and chose the first forth journals 1 223 台社研 4 78 人社 3 81 台社學 2 98 台社刊 排名 被引用次數 台灣社會學門學術期刊
    5. Here is a 2 Mode network graph- 228x11
    6. Here is a 2 Mode network graph- 228x11 Without labels, you can see the pictures clearly.
    7. I adjusted the nodes of the authors. Over 10 citations showed the size, and the others were changed to “1.”
    8. There are 13 authors over 10 citations. Those authors cited more than 2 journals.
      • What’s next?
      • I thought it’s useless to show the authors over 10 citations. I should put more emphasis on the journals, like the partitions of journals.
      • Transform 2 Mode network into 1 mode to show the overlaping between 11 journals.

    + maxweberkomaxweberko, 2 years ago

    custom

    385 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    the data of my thesis

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 385
      • 385 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 1
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories