Evidence Based Medicine Intro

31,554 views
31,750 views

Published on

Published in: Health & Medicine, Education
3 Comments
47 Likes
Statistics
Notes
No Downloads
Views
Total views
31,554
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
17,234
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
904
Comments
3
Likes
47
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Evidence Based Medicine Intro

    1. 1. Evidence Based Medicine Module 1: Introduction to EBM Module 2: Applying EBM--Diagnosis Module 3: Applying EBM--Treatment Prepared by: Jennifer Kleinbart, MD, Asst. Professor of Medicine, Director, EBM Curriculum Emory University School of Medicine Mark V. Williams, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Director, Hospital Medicine Unit Emory University School of Medicine Lawrence Blond, MD, Associate Director Graduate Medical Education, Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation
    2. 2. Evidence Based Medicine An evidence-based approach to answering clinical questions
    3. 3. Outline <ul><li>Introduction </li></ul><ul><li>What is EBM? </li></ul><ul><li>Why do we need it? </li></ul><ul><li>How to use EBM in daily practice </li></ul><ul><li>EBM resources </li></ul>
    4. 4. Bloodletting The cure for hot, moist diseases
    5. 5. Pierre Louis (1787-1872) Inventor of the “numeric method” and the “method of observation” Found that, on average, patients who were bled did worse than those who were not.
    6. 6. Overall Results (n=77) “ Experimental” Group “ Control” Group Absolute Risk Reduction - 19% 25% 44% Mortality Difference Bled Late Bled Early
    7. 7. William Osler (1849 -1919) First “attending physician” at Johns Hopkins Hugely influential textbook author, believed that most drugs in his day were useless, but still advocated blood-letting in some cases.
    8. 8. But…. We practice EBM today
    9. 9. Patient: Mr. A <ul><li>Mr. A is a 60 year old presenting with 1 hour of retrosternal chest pain. ECG shows lateral ST-elevation consistent with acute MI. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>QUESTION: In patients with acute MI, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>does treatment with aspirin reduce mortality? </li></ul></ul>What is the best evidence?
    10. 10. Evidence: 1988 <ul><li>Reduction of mortality in acute myocardial infarction with streptokinase and aspirin therapy. Results of ISIS-2. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Patients with acute MI treated with ASA vs. placebo had a significant 23% relative risk reduction in five-week cardiovascular mortality, with an absolute risk reduction of 11.8% to 9.4%. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The combination of SK and ASA resulted in a 42% relative risk reduction in cardiovascular mortality after five weeks compared with the placebo . </li></ul></ul>
    11. 11. Application: 1997 <ul><li>How many patients receive ASA following acute myocardial infarction? 463 patients in the ER with a definitive diagnosis of acute MI </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Aspirin was not given to 55%!!! </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>78% of patients who did receive aspirin received it more than 30 minutes after arrival to the emergency department. </li></ul></ul>Annals of Intern Medicine. Jul 1997;127(2):126
    12. 12. EBM Misconceptions EBM is useless when there is no good evidence EBM means appropriately using the best available evidence to care for patients EBM is algorithms that ignore clinical judgment/expertise Clinical judgment must be used in deciding how to apply the evidence EBM is just numbers and statistics EBM is not numbers in a vacuum – the evidence must be individualized to each patient FACT FALLACY
    13. 13. EBM - What is it? Clinical Expertise Research Evidence Patient Preferences
    14. 14. Why EBM? <ul><li>Caring for patients creates the need for clinically important information </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Diagnosis….Therapy….Prognosis </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Knowledge deteriorates with time: Practitioners practice what they learned during residency training </li></ul><ul><ul><li>EBM: goal of life-long self-directed learning </li></ul></ul>
    15. 15. Why EBM? <ul><li>New evidence often changes clinical practice </li></ul><ul><li>Prospective learning from reading journals and going to conferences is important, but not sufficient </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Impossible to prospectively acquire all information necessary to treat all future patients </li></ul></ul>
    16. 16. Besieged with Information <ul><li>More than 3800 biomedical journals in MEDLINE </li></ul><ul><li>More than 7300 citations added weekly </li></ul><ul><li>Lag period </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Publication of research findings </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Implementation in clinical practice </li></ul></ul>
    17. 17. Besieged with Information <ul><li>All studies not equally well designed or interpreted </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Adding expert synthesis and analysis can truly help busy clinicians </li></ul></ul>
    18. 18. So, how does it work? EBM Method
    19. 19. EBM Method A cquire the best evidence A ppraise the evidence A pply evidence to patient care A ssess your patient A sk clinical questions
    20. 20. Assess Your Patient <ul><li>History </li></ul><ul><li>Physical examination </li></ul><ul><li>Objective data – labs, x-rays </li></ul><ul><li>Formulate differential diagnosis </li></ul><ul><li>Pretest probability of disease </li></ul>
    21. 21. Ask Clinical Questions Components of Clinical Questions Patient/ Population Outcome Intervention/ Exposure Comparison In patients with acute MI In post- menopausal women In women with suspected coronary disease does early treat- ment with a statin what is the accuracy of exercise ECHO does hormone replacement therapy compared to placebo compared to exercise ECG compared to no HRT decrease cardio- vascular mortality? for diagnosing significant CAD? increase the risk of breast cancer?
    22. 22. Acquire the Best Evidence <ul><li>Where do you find high-quality evidence? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Textbook (print or online) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Medline or PubMed search: find and review articles </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Pre-appraised evidence </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Best Evidence </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Clinical Evidence (Therapy only) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Cochrane Collaboration (Therapy only) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>UpToDate </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Which source enables you to find answers most quickly? </li></ul>
    23. 23. Appraise the Evidence <ul><li>Are the results valid? </li></ul><ul><li>What are the results? </li></ul><ul><li>Can we apply the results to our patient? </li></ul>
    24. 24. Appraise the Evidence <ul><li>Determine if evidence is unbiased or flawed </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Critically appraise articles yourself </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Used a source that appraises trials for you </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Best Evidence </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Clinical Evidence </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Cochrane Library </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>UpToDate </li></ul></ul></ul>
    25. 25. A pply the Evidence <ul><li>Evidence must be applied to each individual patient </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Is your patient similar enough to those studied? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Do benefits outweigh harms? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Cost </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>What are your patient’s values and preferences? </li></ul></ul>
    26. 26. Rules of Evidence <ul><li>All evidence is not created equal. </li></ul><ul><li>Evidence alone never makes clinical decisions. </li></ul><ul><li>Values always influence decisions. </li></ul>

    ×