Efficient urban planning in new energy era

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    6 Favorites

    Efficient urban planning in new energy era - Presentation Transcript

    1.  
    2. Global warming 2 °C global temperatures is the tipping point
    3.  
    4. technologies = solution
    5. technologies = solution ?
    6. The Netherlands Energy Efficient Action Plan (EEPA) 2007 Transport sector >21% energy saving Household sector >22% energy saving until 2016
      • Sustainable energy by
      • 3-step-strategy (K. Duijvestein)
        • Reducing energy demands
        • Using renewable energy source
        • Using limited energy source carefully
      • Large-scale application
      + Our (as a planner) business!! limited time, space and €
    7. Large-scale application limited time, space and € by urban management with urban integration
    8. by design a favorable condition for adopting energy saving measures Large-scale application limited time, space and €
    9. This project illustrates integrated strategies concerning sustainable energy by a urban renewal master plan
    10. Energy use pattern vs. spatial values
    11. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in local level from transportation
    12. Bicycle Amsterdam vs. Rotterdam = 29% vs. 19% Data proved energy use pattern on transport — municipalities level
      • 3 spatial planning values influencing (20-30%) the choice of transport modes and travel demand
      • GHG emissions in local level
      •  
              • Framework of movement
              • Provision of transport alternatives
              • Land-use characteristics
    13. Energy use on housing
    14. Large restructure housing area in Rotterdam south until 2030 Pre-war housing area post-war housing area Urban renewal area Necessity of spatial restructuring to achieve the goal of greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction. The priority switches to the urban renewal master plan
    15. Charlois Pendrecht
      • Site of priority—
      • Spatial structure of transport and housing confirms energy waste
      • Charlois - ranked as second low bicycle use (14%) in Rotterdam
      • Pendrecht -
        • one of postwar social housing storages in Rotterdam (6018DW.)
        • experiencing social degradation on urban edge
        • insufficient public transportation
        • large restructuring planned
      • 3 values for energy consumption in housing renewal plan :
      • Proportion of different types of building
      • Tendency & point of improvement
      • Design urban structure with high climatic quality
      Amount (dwelling) : 3070 826 2122 51% 14% 35% Energy performance EPC 2.0 EPC1.0 EPC0.8 Energy performance on housing—district level
      • Potential and tendency analysis
      • Schemes of development I -- new housing replacement
      • - cost-effective , € for 1kwh heat reduction
        • Old : New= 1: 2.5
        • source: J. Douglas, Building adaptation, 2006
      • policy tendency: necessity of low or zero-carbon houses
        • Energy efficiency requirements to new building
        • 2006 EPC 0.8
        • 2011 EPC 0.6
        • 2015 EPC 0.4
        • 2020 EPC 0
        • Source: VROM, 2008
      € € €
    16. Systematic for refurbishment Source: Dr. Georg Wagener-Lohse, CEBra - Centre for Energy Technology Brandenburg, Cottbus - feasible in cost and time — old housing refurbishment Schemes of development II -- old housing renovation Boiler, Tube insulation Ceiling insulation Thermostatic valves Insulation of one wall Insulation of all walls I A I B I C Standard full energetic refurbishment Standard full refurbishment * estimated effect on consumption in kWh/m² Saving* time ? >20y ? >10y 45% 5-10y 30% 5y
    17. Schemes of development II -- old housing renovation Good market value and add-values are possible Learn from precedent Falmouth, UK, 2003 30% energy saving 5.5 yr pay-back Berlin, Ger, 2007 50% energy saving 7 yr pay-back Veenendaal, NL, 2002 28% energy saving 7 yr pay-back
      • Analysis climatic quality of urban structure
      • Indoor and outdoor passive solar access
      Stamp pattern of post-war housing
    18. Tip A subsidy scheme for existing housing: - solar water heaters, - heat pumps - solar panels - Properly adopting low or zero carbon energy technology
    19. Strategies ; spatial related solution
      • On sustainable mobility
        • Reduce transport demand
        • Use endless resource (muscle)
        • Minimize motorized transport mode
      • On sustainable housing renewal –
      • large scale reduction, not signal item
        • Reducing energy demands
        • Renewable energy source
        • Use energy source wisely
      >> Maximized impact within limited money and time, >> Good market value >> High climatic quality both indoor and public space
    20. Urban renewal master plan
    21. TOD Actual land use and provision of public transportation in Pendrecht
    22. 70% metro passengers from tram connected areas Extending the tram track + the terminal of Randstad Rail
    23. Transportation framework &provision multiply connect control Proposal of transport framework
    24. Pendrecht urban renewal mater plan
    25. ≈ 2000 dwellings
        • Housing refurbishment
      Carry out 9% energy reduction for Pendrecht (25-30% of its own) Pendrecht urban renewal mater plan
    26. B A A B Design task- lot A & B housing stock
    27. Comparable new housing for lot A A Density after completion: 6546 DW.m2/ha = 50 DW/ha (count by 130 ㎡ /DW) (9419) (73) Housing standard: Zero CO 2 emission BedZED current condition Design task- lot A & B housing stock
    28. Comparable housing restructure case for lot B B Density after completion: 9351 DW.m2/ha = 71 DW/ha (count by 130 ㎡ /DW) Housing standard: energy saving: 62 % Poptahof current condition Motivation and goal ︱ Problem definiion ︱ Site analysis ︱ Strategy ︱ Urban renewal master plan Design task- lot A & B housing stock
    29. A B Housing lot A & B design proposal Design task- lot A & B housing stock 2-3 4 2-3 3 3 3 2-3
    30. C C Design task- lot C housing stock
    31. Comparable housing restructure case for lot C C Density after completion: 8881 DW.m2/ha = 68 DW/ha (count by 130 ㎡ /DW) Housing standard: energy saving: 45 % Hoogvliet current condition Design task- lot C housing stock
    32. C Housing lot C design proposal 4 3-4 2-3 4 4 4 3 4 3 2-3 Design task- lot C housing stock
    33. D Showcase project D: 2 high-rise flat transfer to office use D
    34. Attractive public space revives community and encourage green movement Perspective
    35. Quality of space: public space Current condition Perspective
    36. Quality of space: public space Current condition Perspective
    37. Green structure connects to Zuiderpark Zuiderpark Proposal: Wind energy in open space Perspective
    38. Progressive energy reduction -23%
    39. -9% -12.5%
    40. -1.8% >-6%
    41. -5%
    42. -5%
    43. Pendrecht Project extension
      • Leading project and applicability
      • Household and transport sectors
      • Postwar housing area (71,723dwelling)
      • Population in urban edge
      • Public transport connected area
      • Short distant movement
      Postwar housing area Contribute to the transformation of the city as a whole
    44. Conclusion
      • Approaching large-scale GHG reduction: strategy should be less sectors, more integration and strong impact .
      • Energy waste control is crucial important among every measure
      • Data analysis support decision-making
      • Graphic analysis locates the problems and solutions
    45. Conclusion
      • old housing refurbishment: 60% energy
      • reduction by insulation measures without
      • considerable material waste and relative
      • cheap
      • Improving bicycle use environment can replace >10% of car use for daily trip, land use character can influence 20-30%
      • higher density can create financial advantage for new energy and transport infrastructures
      • building typology among energy saving measures, is more important on microclimate and living quality
      • No clear evidence between travel demand and mixed land use strategy , yet it generates social and market value
    46. Large scale GHG reduction can be achieved by the process of urban renewal as a clear tool Thank you
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + mavizlumavizlu Nominate

    custom

    512 views, 6 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    The approach of urban renewal by premise of large-s more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 512
      • 512 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 6
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories