Your SlideShare is downloading.
×

×

Saving this for later?
Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Like this presentation? Why not share!

- Portfolio management lecture by kudah nyahore 66 views
- Second lecture on investment analys... by Hangoba Zulu 1970 views
- Cost of Capital (Equity Capital) by Zorro29 3718 views
- State of Project Portfolio Manageme... by PM Solutions 1991 views
- Sharpe index model by Ashwini Das 4858 views
- Covariance by Jon Watte 571 views
- Introduction to measures of relatio... by Ivan Pesigan 395 views
- Beta-A measure of market risk by Atif Ghayas 149 views
- Integer programming branch and bound by Alejandro Angulo 865 views
- Chapter v capital market theory by nirdoshk88 2583 views
- Security Analysis And Portfolio Man... by Jay Harb 89201 views
- Operations management 10th edition ... by speakingmouth32432 3699 views

Like this? Share it with your network
Share

1,475

views

views

Published on

No Downloads

Total Views

1,475

On Slideshare

0

From Embeds

0

Number of Embeds

1

Shares

0

Downloads

39

Comments

0

Likes

2

No embeds

No notes for slide

- 1. Chapter 6 Efficient Diversification
- 2. Relationship Between Risk and Return – Let’s revisit… Exhibit I Possible Investment Outcomes Taxi & Bus Companies State of the Economy Poor Average Good Bus Company 1,300,000 1,210,000 700,000 Taxi Company 600,000 1,210,000 1,400,000 Harry Markowitz -- one of the founders of modern finance – contributed greatly to modern financial theory and practice. In his dissertation he argued that investors are 1) risk adverse, and 2) evaluate investment opportunities by comparing expected returns relative to risk which he defined as the standard deviation of the expected returns. This example is based on his seminal work.
- 3. Step 1: Calculate the potential return on each investment... Rit = (Priceit+1 - Priceit)/Priceit Where: Rit = The holding period return for investment “i” for time period “t” Priceit = The price of investment “i” at time period “t” Priceit+1 = The price of investment “i’ at time period “t+1” State of the Economy Poor Average Good Bus Company 30.00% 21.00% -30.00% Taxi Company -40.00% 21.00% 40.00%
- 4. Step 2: Calculate the expected return (E)Rit = ΣXi Rit Where: Xi = Probability of a given event The Expected Return for the Taxi and Bus Companies - (E)RBus = 1/3(-30%) + 1/3(21%) + 1/3(30%) = 7% (E)RTaxi = 7%
- 5. Step 3: Measure risk
- 6. Step 5: Compare the alternatives Expected Return 10% 7% --------------B------T 2% 10% 20% 30% 40% Risk (Standard Deviation) We have two investment alternatives with the same expected return – which one is preferable? Bus Company Taxi Company Expected Return 7% 7% Standard Deviation 26.42% 34.13%
- 7. Conclusion Based on our analysis the Bus Company represents a superior investment alternative to the Taxi company. Since the Bus company represents a superior return to the Taxi company, why would anyone hold the Taxi company?
- 8. Portfolio Analysis of Investment Decision Assume you invest 50 percent of your money in the Bus company and 50 percent in the Taxi company. Exhibit IV Portfolio Analysis of Investment Decision State of the Economy Poor Average Good Bus Company 30.00% 21.00% -30.00% Taxi Company -40.00% 21.00% 40.00% 50 percent in each -5.00% 21.00% 5.00%
- 9. Portfolio Return... (E)Rp = Σwj(E)rit Where: (E)Rp = The expected return on the portfolio wj = The proportion of the portfolio’s total value = .5(7%) + .5(7%) = 7% or, (E)Rp = -5%(1/3) + 21%(1/3) + 5%(1/3) = 7%
- 10. Portfolio Risk The standard deviation of the portfolio: σp = 10.68% Note - The expected return of the portfolio is simply a weighted- average of the of the expected returns for each alternative; the standard deviation of the portfolio is not a simple weighted- average. Why? The formula for the portfolio standard deviation is: σp = (wa2* σa2 + wb2* σb2 + 2*wa*wb* σa* σb*rab).5 Where: Wa – weight of security A Wb – weight of security B σa = standard deviation of security A’s return σb = standard deviation of security B’s return Corrab = correlation coefficient between security A and B
- 11. Risk Reduction Holding more than one asset in a portfolio (with less than a correlation coefficient of positive 1) reduces the range or spread of possible outcomes; the smaller the range, the lower the total risk. State of the Economy Poor Average Good Bus Company 30.00% 21.00% -30.00% Taxi Company -40.00% 21.00% 40.00% 50 percent in each -5.00% 21.00% 5.00% Correlation coefficient = CovarianceAB /σAσB Covariance = ΣpAB(A – E(A))*(B – E(B)) = 1/3(30% - 7%)(-40% - 7%) + 1/3(21% - 7%)(21% - 7%) + 1/3 (-30% - 7%)(40% - 7%) = -.0702 Correlation coefficient = -.0702/((.2642)*(.3413)) = -.78
- 12. Standard Deviation of a Two-Asset Portfolio σp = (wa2* σa2 + wb2* σb2 + 2*wa*wb* σa* σb*rab).5 Where: Wa – weight of security A (.5) Wb – weight of security B (.5) σa = standard deviation of security A’s return (26.42%) σb = standard deviation of security B’s return (34.13%) rab = correlation coefficient between security A and B (-.78) σp = ((.5)2 (26.42)2 + (.5)2 (34.13)2 + 2(.5)(.5)(26.42)(34.13)(-.78)).5 σp = (174.50 +291.21 - 351.67).5 σp = 10.68%
- 13. Risk Reduction Expected Return 10% 7% ----P--------B------T 2% 10% 20% 30% 40% Risk (Standard Deviation) The net effect is that an investor can reduce their overall risk by holding assets with less than a perfect positive correlation in a portfolio relative to the expected return of the portfolio.
- 14. Extending the example to numerous securities... Expected Return Risk (Standard Deviation) Each point represents the expected return/standard deviation relationship for some number of individual investment opportunities.
- 15. Extending the example to numerous securities... Expected Return Risk (Standard Deviation) This point represents a new possible risk - return combination
- 16. More on Correlation & the Risk- Return Trade-Off
- 17. Efficient Frontier Expected Return Risk (Standard Deviation) Each point represents the highest potential return for a given level of risk
- 18. Breakdown of Risk Total Risk = Diversifiable Risk + Non Diversifiable Risk Diversifiable Risk = Company specific risk Nondiversifiable Risk = Market risk Total Risk () Number of Securities Company specific or diversifiable risk Market risk or Non- diversifiable risk Total Risk
- 19. Diversification and Risk
- 20. Why Diversification Works, I. Correlation: The tendency of the returns on two assets to move together. Imperfect correlation is the key reason why diversification reduces portfolio risk as measured by the portfolio standard deviation. Positively correlated assets tend to move up and down together. Negatively correlated assets tend to move in opposite directions. Imperfect correlation, positive or negative, is why diversification reduces portfolio risk.
- 21. Why Diversification Works, II. The correlation coefficient is denoted by Corr(RA, RB) or simply, rA,B. The correlation coefficient measures correlation and ranges from: From: -1 (perfect negative correlation) Through: 0 (uncorrelated) To: +1 (perfect positive correlation)
- 22. Why Diversification Works, III.
- 23. Why Diversification Works, IV.
- 24. Why Diversification Works, V.
- 25. Correlation and Diversification
- 26. Minimum Variance Combinations -1< r < +1 1 2 - Cov(r1r2) W1 = + - 2Cov(r1r2) 2 W2 = (1 - W1) 2 2 2 Choosing weights to minimize the portfolio variance 6-26
- 27. 1 Minimum Variance Combinations -1< r < +1 2E(r2) = .14 = .20Stk 2 12 = .2 E(r1) = .10 = .15Stk 1 r 11 22 - Cov(r1r2)- Cov(r1r2) W1W1 == ++ - 2Cov(r1r2)- 2Cov(r1r2) 22 W2W2 = (1 - W1)= (1 - W1) 2 2 2 2 2 2 11 22 - Cov(r1r2)- Cov(r1r2) W1W1 == ++ - 2Cov(r1r2)- 2Cov(r1r2) 22 W2W2 = (1 - W1)= (1 - W1) 2 2 2 2 2 2 WW11 == (.2)(.2)22 -- (.2)(.15)(.2)(.2)(.15)(.2) (.15)(.15)22 + (.2)+ (.2)22 -- 2(.2)(.15)(.2)2(.2)(.15)(.2) WW11 = .6733= .6733 WW22 = (1= (1 -- .6733) = .3267.6733) = .3267 WW11 == (.2)(.2)22 -- (.2)(.15)(.2)(.2)(.15)(.2) (.15)(.15)22 + (.2)+ (.2)22 -- 2(.2)(.15)(.2)2(.2)(.15)(.2) WW11 = .6733= .6733 WW22 = (1= (1 -- .6733) = .3267.6733) = .3267 WW11 == (.2)(.2)22 -- (.2)(.15)(.2)(.2)(.15)(.2) (.15)(.15)22 + (.2)+ (.2)22 -- 2(.2)(.15)(.2)2(.2)(.15)(.2) WW11 = .6733= .6733 WW22 = (1= (1 -- .6733) = .3267.6733) = .3267 WW11 == (.2)(.2)22 -- (.2)(.15)(.2)(.2)(.15)(.2) (.15)(.15)22 + (.2)+ (.2)22 -- 2(.2)(.15)(.2)2(.2)(.15)(.2) WW11 = .6733= .6733 WW22 = (1= (1 -- .6733) = .3267.6733) = .3267Cov(r1r2) = r1,212 6-27
- 28. E[rp] = Minimum Variance: Return and Risk with r = .2 22E(r2) = .14E(r2) = .14 = .20= .20Stk 2Stk 2 1212 = .2= .2 E(r1) = .10E(r1) = .10 = .15= .15Stk 1Stk 1 rr 22E(r2) = .14E(r2) = .14 = .20= .20Stk 2Stk 2 1212 = .2= .2 E(r1) = .10E(r1) = .10 = .15= .15Stk 1Stk 1 E(r1) = .10E(r1) = .10 = .15= .15Stk 1Stk 1 rr 1/2 2222 p (0.2)(0.15)(0.2)(0.3267)(0.6733)2)(0.2)(0.3267)(0.15)(0.6733σ p 2 = %.. / p 081301710 21 WW11 == (.2)(.2)22 -- (.2)(.15)(.2)(.2)(.15)(.2) (.15)(.15)22 + (.2)+ (.2)22 -- 2(.2)(.15)(.2)2(.2)(.15)(.2) WW11 = .6733= .6733 WW22 = (1= (1 -- .6733) = .3267.6733) = .3267 WW11 == (.2)(.2)22 -- (.2)(.15)(.2)(.2)(.15)(.2) (.15)(.15)22 + (.2)+ (.2)22 -- 2(.2)(.15)(.2)2(.2)(.15)(.2) WW11 = .6733= .6733 WW22 = (1= (1 -- .6733) = .3267.6733) = .3267 1 .6733(.10) + .3267(.14) = .1131 or 11.31% W1 21 2 + W2 22 2 + 2W1W2 r1,212 6-28
- 29. WW11 == (.2)(.2)22 -- (.2)(.15)((.2)(.15)(--.3).3) (.15)(.15)22 + (.2)+ (.2)22 -- 2(.2)(.15)(2(.2)(.15)(--.3).3) WW11 = .6087= .6087 WW22 = (1= (1 -- .6087) = .3913.6087) = .3913 WW11 == (.2)(.2)22 -- (.2)(.15)((.2)(.15)(--.3).3) (.15)(.15)22 + (.2)+ (.2)22 -- 2(.2)(.15)(2(.2)(.15)(--.3).3) WW11 = .6087= .6087 WW22 = (1= (1 -- .6087) = .3913.6087) = .3913 Minimum Variance Combination with r = -.3 11 22 - Cov(r1r2)- Cov(r1r2) W1W1 == ++ - 2Cov(r1r2)- 2Cov(r1r2) 22 W2W2 = (1 - W1)= (1 - W1) 2 2 2 2 2 2 11 22 - Cov(r1r2)- Cov(r1r2) W1W1 == ++ - 2Cov(r1r2)- 2Cov(r1r2) 22 W2W2 = (1 - W1)= (1 - W1) 2 2 2 2 2 2 22E(r2) = .14E(r2) = .14 = .20= .20Stk 2Stk 2 1212 = .2= .2 E(r1) = .10E(r1) = .10 = .15= .15Stk 1Stk 1 rr 22E(r2) = .14E(r2) = .14 = .20= .20Stk 2Stk 2 1212 = .2= .2 E(r1) = .10E(r1) = .10 = .15= .15Stk 1Stk 1 E(r1) = .10E(r1) = .10 = .15= .15Stk 1Stk 1 rr -.31 Cov(r1r2) = r1,212 WW11 == (.2)(.2)22 -- ((--.3)(.15)(.2).3)(.15)(.2) (.15)(.15)22 + (.2)+ (.2)22 -- 2(2(--.3)(.15)(.2).3)(.15)(.2) WW11 == (.2)(.2)22 -- ((--.3)(.15)(.2).3)(.15)(.2) (.15)(.15)22 + (.2)+ (.2)22 -- 2(2(--.3)(.15)(.2).3)(.15)(.2) 6-29
- 30. WW11 == (.2)(.2)22 -- (.2)(.15)((.2)(.15)(--.3).3) (.15)(.15)22 + (.2)+ (.2)22 -- 2(.2)(.15)(2(.2)(.15)(--.3).3) WW11 = .6087= .6087 WW22 = (1= (1 -- .6087) = .3913.6087) = .3913 WW11 == (.2)(.2)22 -- (.2)(.15)((.2)(.15)(--.3).3) (.15)(.15)22 + (.2)+ (.2)22 -- 2(.2)(.15)(2(.2)(.15)(--.3).3) WW11 = .6087= .6087 WW22 = (1= (1 -- .6087) = .3913.6087) = .3913 Minimum Variance Combination with r = -.3 22E(r2) = .14E(r2) = .14 = .20= .20Stk 2Stk 2 1212 = .2= .2 E(r1) = .10E(r1) = .10 = .15= .15Stk 1Stk 1 rr 22E(r2) = .14E(r2) = .14 = .20= .20Stk 2Stk 2 1212 = .2= .2 E(r1) = .10E(r1) = .10 = .15= .15Stk 1Stk 1 E(r1) = .10E(r1) = .10 = .15= .15Stk 1Stk 1 rr -.3 E[rp] = 1/2 2222 p (0.2)(0.15)(-0.3)(0.3913)(0.6087)2)(0.2)(0.3913)(0.15)(0.6087σ p 2 = %.. / p 091001020 21 0.6087(.10) + 0.3913(.14) = .1157 = 11.57% W1 21 2 + W2 22 2 + 2W1W2 r1,212 1 Notice lower portfolio standard deviation but higher expected return with smaller r r12 = .2 E(rp) = 11.31% p = 13.08% 6-30
- 31. Individual securities We have learned that investors should diversify. Individual securities will be held in a portfolio. We call the risk that cannot be diversified away, i.e., the risk that remains when the stock is put into a portfolio – the systematic risk Major question -- How do we measure a stock’s systematic risk? Consequently, the relevant risk of an individual security is the risk that remains when the security is placed in a portfolio. 6-31
- 32. Systematic risk Systematic risk arises from events that effect the entire economy such as a change in interest rates or GDP or a financial crisis such as occurred in 2007and 2008. If a well diversified portfolio has no unsystematic risk then any risk that remains must be systematic. That is, the variation in returns of a well diversified portfolio must be due to changes in systematic factors. 6-32
- 33. Single Index Model Parameter Estimation Risk Prem Market Risk Prem or Index Risk Prem = the stock’s expected excess return if the market’s excess return is zero, i.e., (rm - rf) = 0 ßi(rm - rf) = the component of excess return due to movements in the market index ei = firm specific component of excess return that is not due to market movements αi errrr ifmiifi 6-33
- 34. Estimating the Index Model Excess Returns (i) Security Characteristic Line . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . Excess returns on market index Ri = i + ßiRm + ei Slope of SCL = beta y-intercept = alpha Scatter Plot 6-34
- 35. Estimating the Index Model Excess Returns (i) Security Characteristic Line. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . Excess returns on market index Variation in Ri explained by the line is the stock’s systematic risk Variation in Ri unrelated to the market (the line) is unsystematic risk Scatter Plot Ri = i + ßiRm + ei 6-35
- 36. Components of Risk Market or systematic risk: Unsystematic or firm specific risk: Total risk = Systematic + Unsystematic risk related to the systematic or macro economic factor in this case the market index risk not related to the macro factor or market index ßiM + ei i 2 = Systematic risk + Unsystematic Risk 6-36
- 37. Comparing Security Characteristic Lines Describe e for each 6-37
- 38. Measuring Components of Risk i 2 = where; i 2 m 2 + 2(ei) i 2 = total variance i 2 m 2 = systematic variance 2(ei) = unsystematic variance 6-38 The total risk of security i, is the risk associated with the market + the risk associated with any firm specific shocks. (its this simple because the market variance and the variance of the residuals are uncorrelated.)
- 39. Total Risk = Systematic Risk + Unsystematic Risk Systematic Risk / Total Risk Examining Percentage of Variance ßi 2 m 2 / i 2 = r2 i 2 m 2 / (i 2 m 2 + 2(ei)) = r2 6-39 The ratio of the systematic risk to total risk is actually the square of the correlation coefficient between the asset and the market.
- 40. Sharpe Ratios and alphas When ranking portfolios and security performance we must consider both return & risk “Well performing” diversified portfolios provide high Sharpe ratios: Sharpe = (rp – rf) / p The Sharpe ratio can also be used to evaluate an individual stock if the investor does not diversify 6-40

Be the first to comment