Weaving digital information into physical space

  • 1,486 views
Uploaded on

Slides from my UX Australia 2011 talk on integrating digital information into physical environments. In the talk I outlined how this field has evolved in the past decades. The second half of the talk …

Slides from my UX Australia 2011 talk on integrating digital information into physical environments. In the talk I outlined how this field has evolved in the past decades. The second half of the talk discussed specific challenges in the context of the Neighbourhood Scoreboards project.

For more information visit the project website: http://neighbourhoodscoreboards.com/

More information about the talk is available from the UX Australia website: http://uxaustralia.com.au/conference-2011/weaving-digital-information-into-physical-space

More in: Design , Technology , Education
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
1,486
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2

Actions

Shares
Downloads
52
Comments
1
Likes
5

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Weaving digital information into physical space: New frontiers for prototyping experiences Martin Tomitsch | The University of Sydney
  • 2. Balance privacy and clarity (low-res vs high-res)
  • 3. Balance privacy and clarity (low-res vs high-res)Designing for a dynamic architectural fabric
  • 4. Balance privacy and clarity (low-res vs high-res)Designing for a dynamic architectural fabricPrototyping as a form of evaluation
  • 5. cityofsound.com
  • 6. Blackboard displaymoods –!blackboard customization
  • 7. Blackboard displaymoods – filling in information
  • 8. location/shape
  • 9. location/shape
  • 10. 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 1 24 , THAN YESTERDAY MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN1. change in %change energy usage of household in % compared to the day before.
  • 11. 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 24 , THAN YESTERDAY ... and 5 % more than LASt WEEK MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN 22. rankingranking based on percentage of change.updated 3 times a day
  • 12. 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 303 house 24 , 9am THAN YESTERDAY ... and 5 % more than LASt WEEK neighbourhood MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN3. graph3a. graph for house3b. graph for neighbourhood avergae
  • 13. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 house 24 , 9am THAN YESTERDAY ... and 5 % more than LASt WEEK neighbourhood MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN4. barresume of behaviour– relative system– not compared to neighbourhood – only compared to own previous behaviour
  • 14. -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3
  • 15. day 12: less usage, jumps to +1+1 (not to -2)-3 day 11: same usage on a -2 level = again -2 3 times -2 = -3 day 10: same usage on the -2 level = again -2-2 day 9: same usage on a -1 level = again -1-2 3 times -1 = -2 day 8: more usage-1 = again -1 day 7: more usage-1 = jumps to -1 (not to +2) day 6: no change or improvement – third+3 day in a row = +3+2 day 5: less usage = second crown / +2 day 4: still no change+2 no change on a +1 level = +1 3 positive days in a row (3x +1) = +2 energy usage+1 day 3: no change in usage – but the day before was an improvement so it‘s still considered +1+1 day 2: less usage = +1 day 1: everyone starts with 00
  • 16. 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 house 24 , 9am THAN YESTERDAY ... and 5 % more than LASt WEEKneighbourhood MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
  • 17. 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 24 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 , ... and 5 % more than 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 THAN YESTERDAY 24 and 5 % more LASt WEEK , THAN YESTERDAY than LASt WEEK house 9am house neighbourhood MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUNhouse NBHD 9am MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
  • 18. alternative 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 24 , THAN YESTERDAY ... and 5 % more than LASt WEEK 24 and 5 % more , THAN YESTERDAY than LASt WEEK house 9am neighbourhood MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN house house NBHD 9am MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
  • 19. www.neighbourhoodscoreboards.com
  • 20. www.neighbourhoodscoreboards.com
  • 21. www.neighbourhoodscoreboards.com
  • 22. www.neighbourhoodscoreboards.com
  • 23. www.neighbourhoodscoreboards.com public & private private display no display50 m display (A) only (B) (C)
  • 24. www.neighbourhoodscoreboards.comChange after the installation in week 4:Public display - 13.2%Commercial energy monitor -12.1%No display - no change
  • 25. www.neighbourhoodscoreboards.comAverage change per week over 7 weeks:Public display - 2.5%Commercial energy monitor -1%No display - 0.5%
  • 26. Balance privacy and clarity
  • 27. Balance privacy and clarity
  • 28. Designing for a dynamic architectural fabric 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 24 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 , ... and 5 % more than 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 THAN YESTERDAY 24 and 5 % more LASt WEEK , THAN YESTERDAY than LASt WEEK house 9am house neighbourhood MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUNhouse NBHD 9am MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
  • 29. alternative Designing for a dynamic architectural fabric 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 24 , THAN YESTERDAY ... and 5 % more than LASt WEEK 24 and 5 % more , THAN YESTERDAY than LASt WEEK house 9am neighbourhood MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN house house NBHD 9am MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
  • 30. Prototyping as a form of evaluation
  • 31. Prototyping as a form of evaluation
  • 32. Prototyping as a form of evaluation
  • 33. Prototyping as a form of evaluation
  • 34. Prototyping as a form of evaluation
  • 35. Balance privacy and clarity (low-res vs high-res)Designing for a dynamic architectural fabricPrototyping as a form of evaluation
  • 36. Image creditsSlide 03: ENIAC Computer – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Eniac.jpgSlide 04: ATTiny – http://www.flickr.com/photos/project-hal0/2322389540/ (Example taken from Mike Kuniavsky’s book “Smart Things”)Slide 05: Xerox Star – http://catchrandom.blogspot.com/2010/05/first-computer-user-interface-1981.htmlSlide 07: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mac_fun/5328640028/sizes/l/in/photostream/Slide 08: Ambient Orb – http://www.ambientdevices.com/cat/images/greenorb_withchair.jpgSlide 09: Weather Toaster – http://infosthetics.com/archives/2005/12/ambient_weather_toaster_visualization.htmlSlide 10: http://www.ambientdevices.comSlide 13: Augmented City (Keiichi Matsuda) – http://www.keiichimatsuda.com/augmentedcity.phpSlide 14: Honours project by Mandy Leung @ Sydney Uni (photo by Josh Mcinerheney)Slide 19: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jamesm/2053805960/Slide 20: Home Joule (Ambient Devices)Slide 21: Wattson – http://www.diykyoto.com/uk/wattson/aboutSlide 22: Honours project by Silje Johansen @ Sydney UniSlide 23: Sketch by Dan Hill (cityofsound.com)Slide 70: Real Ideal concept – http://depts.washington.edu/ixd/blog/2009/12/20/intel-envisioning-interactions-in-the- home-of-the-future/Slide 71: Mockup by Hanley Weng (Advanced Interaction Design class, 2011 @ Sydney Uni)Slide 72: http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/over-the-top-web-sites.html
  • 37. Andrew Vande Moere Martin TomitschMonika Hoinkis @martintomElmar Trefz The University of SydneySilje Johansen Design LabAllison JonesJosh McinerheneyDamien KwanCredits & thanks:Public feedback display sketches and mockups by Monika Hoinkis;Photos by Josh Mcinerheney, Nikash Singh, Martin Tomitsch, Elmar Trefz;Dan Hill for inspiration and input during the initial project phase;Timo Arnall for using dashed lines to show hidden information.The project was funded by the Faculty of Architecture, Design & Planning – Sustainability Cluster.www.neighbourhoodscoreboards.com