Design Research as the Avant-garde of design science of design MVL
Structure of the presentation <ul><li>Briefly about Martin </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Research context,  </li></ul></ul><ul><ul...
Research context <ul><li>Place: </li></ul><ul><li>Center for Interactive Spaces, ISIS Katrinebjerg </li></ul><ul><ul><li>C...
Cases and findings <ul><li>Future Hybrid Library </li></ul><ul><ul><li>iFloor, (with Main public library in Århus) </li></...
Frameworking <ul><li>Presenting the results of the project as conceptual frameworks to enable an increased understanding b...
The project Context
Today – 3PART Working as: Interaction designer and Innovation consultant
Science of Design
The easily definable field of design research Conflict and convergence Design thinking Design as science Design as experim...
Conflict or convergence <ul><li>Convergence </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Common ground </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Constructive sc...
“ We have been slow to recognize the peculiar indeterminacy of subject matters in design and its impact on the nature of d...
Conflict <ul><ul><li>Difference in design thinking </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Aesthetic inquiry </li></ul></ul></ul><u...
Design thinking ” everyone designs who devises courses of action aimed at changing existing situations into preferred ones...
Krippendorff <ul><li>Design brings forward what does not come natural </li></ul><ul><li>Design proposes realizable artifac...
More to design <ul><li>Wicked problems </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Dealing with the unpredictable human and his social world </l...
Aesthetic inquiry Science of design Søren Kjørup (1999) & Alexander Baumgarten (1737)
Design as Science <ul><li>What is science? </li></ul><ul><li>What is a scientific fact? </li></ul>Science of design
Bruno Latour <ul><li>There should not be a primacy to the natural sciences </li></ul><ul><li>Scientific results should be ...
Falsification <ul><li>Based on a framework developed by Stenger and Despret (as reported by Bruno Latour) </li></ul><ul><u...
Principle <ul><li>“ (t)he distance to be examined is not that of the observer and the observed (…) but that between the co...
Types of design research <ul><li>Research-on-design </li></ul><ul><ul><li>External interest in the product and use of desi...
Design as an experimental approach <ul><li>Testing hypotheses by making them real and putting them into context </li></ul>...
Taking part in the discussions <ul><li>Design research needs to be in line with the surrounding community </li></ul><ul><u...
Relevance vs. rigor <ul><li>Defined by the community of peers </li></ul><ul><li>Design is a constructive science </li></ul...
Practice and research <ul><li>Design research is the  avant-garde  of design </li></ul>Science of design
Repertoire of action Science of design
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Design Research as the Avant-garde of Design

2,051

Published on

The closing keynote by Martin Ludvigsen at the Art of Research seminar at University of Art and Design Helsinki, October 2007

Published in: Technology, Design
0 Comments
3 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,051
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
86
Comments
0
Likes
3
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Briefly about the outset for making this research into the workings of design research Being not at home in the wider HCI community – baffled by: Uninteresting results Presented in uninteresting ways No one were really kicking ass – just looking for smallish issues I thought that there must be a reason why we (designers) do not fit in here AND there must be away to define design research that makes it interesting to the wider designer field – not only the academic field of psycologists, computer scientists etc at CHI, DIS and the rest of the conferences
  • Design Research as the Avant-garde of Design

    1. 1. Design Research as the Avant-garde of design science of design MVL
    2. 2. Structure of the presentation <ul><li>Briefly about Martin </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Research context, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Current activities </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Science of design - design research as a scientific discipline </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Conflict or confluence </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Design thinking </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Design as science </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Design as an experimental approach </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Taking part in the big discussion </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Relevance vs. rigor </li></ul></ul></ul>
    3. 3. Research context <ul><li>Place: </li></ul><ul><li>Center for Interactive Spaces, ISIS Katrinebjerg </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Collaborative projects, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>designers, computer scientists, engineer </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Working with industrial partners , LEGO, B&O </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Field: </li></ul><ul><li>Ubiquitous Computing as Interactive Spaces </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Interaction design </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Focus on constellations of technologies and use </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Writing thesis “Designing for Social Interaction” </li></ul></ul></ul>Context
    4. 4. Cases and findings <ul><li>Future Hybrid Library </li></ul><ul><ul><li>iFloor, (with Main public library in Århus) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>-> Levels of social interaction </li></ul></ul><ul><li>iHome </li></ul><ul><ul><li>MediaSurfaces, (with B&O) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>-> The collective user </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Nomadic Play </li></ul><ul><ul><li>DARE! Game, (with LEGO) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>-> Design as facilitation </li></ul></ul>Context
    5. 5. Frameworking <ul><li>Presenting the results of the project as conceptual frameworks to enable an increased understanding by designers and more reflected design practice </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Design sensibilities </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Ways to make designers think </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>TOOLS FOR THOUGHT AND ACTION </li></ul></ul></ul>Context
    6. 6. The project Context
    7. 7. Today – 3PART Working as: Interaction designer and Innovation consultant
    8. 8. Science of Design
    9. 9. The easily definable field of design research Conflict and convergence Design thinking Design as science Design as experimental inquiry Taking part in the discussion Relevance vs. rigor Science of design
    10. 10. Conflict or convergence <ul><li>Convergence </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Common ground </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Constructive sciences, action research </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>HCI interest in design </li></ul></ul>Science of design
    11. 11. “ We have been slow to recognize the peculiar indeterminacy of subject matters in design and its impact on the nature of design thinking. As a consequence, each of the sciences that have come into contact with design has tended to regard design as an “applied” version of its own knowledge, methods, and principles.” (Buchanan 1995)
    12. 12. Conflict <ul><ul><li>Difference in design thinking </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Aesthetic inquiry </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Wicked problems </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>(creativity?) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Unable or un-interested in fulfilling the (most rigorous) criteria for good science in the wider field of HCI </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>A need for an independent and self-confident design science </li></ul></ul></ul>Science of design
    13. 13. Design thinking ” everyone designs who devises courses of action aimed at changing existing situations into preferred ones” (Herbert Simon) Science of design
    14. 14. Krippendorff <ul><li>Design brings forward what does not come natural </li></ul><ul><li>Design proposes realizable artifacts to others </li></ul><ul><li>Design must support the lives of ideally large communities </li></ul><ul><li>Design cannot avoid ethical questions </li></ul><ul><li>[Designed] artifacts must make sense to most, ideally all of those who have a stake in them </li></ul><ul><ul><li>(Krippendorff 2006) </li></ul></ul>Science of design
    15. 15. More to design <ul><li>Wicked problems </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Dealing with the unpredictable human and his social world </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Hermeneutical gap (Hallnäs and Redström, 2006) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Jumping” into creation across a gap of certainty </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Aesthetic explorations, taste, talent </li></ul>Science of design
    16. 16. Aesthetic inquiry Science of design Søren Kjørup (1999) & Alexander Baumgarten (1737)
    17. 17. Design as Science <ul><li>What is science? </li></ul><ul><li>What is a scientific fact? </li></ul>Science of design
    18. 18. Bruno Latour <ul><li>There should not be a primacy to the natural sciences </li></ul><ul><li>Scientific results should be in the form of good proposition – not statements </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Articulate or inarticulate vs. true or false </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ The decisive advantage of articulation over accuracy of reference is that there is no end to articulation whereas there is and end to accuracy.” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>(Latour 2004) </li></ul></ul></ul>Science of design
    19. 19. Falsification <ul><li>Based on a framework developed by Stenger and Despret (as reported by Bruno Latour) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Scientific is a rare ingredient of science </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Scientific means interesting </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Scientific means risky </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Look for recalcitrance in the humans and non-humans that he investigates </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Provide these with occasion to differ at the very base of the inquiry </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Neither distance nor empathy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Good generalizations allows for a multi-verse </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Insights to exist in a common world. </li></ul></ul>Science of design
    20. 20. Principle <ul><li>“ (t)he distance to be examined is not that of the observer and the observed (…) but that between the contents of the world before and after the inquiry (…): is there now a distance between the new repertoire of actions and the repertoire with which we started?” </li></ul>
    21. 21. Types of design research <ul><li>Research-on-design </li></ul><ul><ul><li>External interest in the product and use of design </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Research-in-design </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Methods of design, creativity and innovation </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Research-through-design </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Applying design methods as a way of inquiry </li></ul></ul>Science of design
    22. 22. Design as an experimental approach <ul><li>Testing hypotheses by making them real and putting them into context </li></ul>> > Hypotheses - Relevant to the design community Design work - Creating or manifesting the hypotheses Testing and reflecting - Working scientific with the design, applying critical thought
    23. 23. Taking part in the discussions <ul><li>Design research needs to be in line with the surrounding community </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Design community </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Technical community </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Developmental community </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Philosophical community </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Reaching new land – pointing to the next phases of design development </li></ul>
    24. 24. Relevance vs. rigor <ul><li>Defined by the community of peers </li></ul><ul><li>Design is a constructive science </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Permitted to work by exemplars </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Design is a discipline that deals with the life of people </li></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Wicked problems” are inherent in our subject matter </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Argyris (on Action Research) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>“ seek to attain theory that identifies patterns that, suitably combined, will be useful in many situations” </li></ul></ul></ul>
    25. 25. Practice and research <ul><li>Design research is the avant-garde of design </li></ul>Science of design
    26. 26. Repertoire of action Science of design
    1. A particular slide catching your eye?

      Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

    ×