• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
PAL LA Assessment Specification (Medics)
 

PAL LA Assessment Specification (Medics)

on

  • 942 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
942
Views on SlideShare
549
Embed Views
393

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
8
Comments
0

1 Embed 393

http://www2.le.ac.uk 393

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft Word

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    PAL LA Assessment Specification (Medics) PAL LA Assessment Specification (Medics) Document Transcript

    • Peer Assisted Learning Leicester Award: Assessment Specification<br />(Medicine)<br />Assessment for the Peer Assisted Learning Leicester Award will be through the submission of a portfolio and a presentation.<br />The portfolio<br />The portfolio can be submitted in a paper or electronic format and should contain the following:<br />
      • Evidence of at least 20 hours of Peer Assisted Learning leadership related activity (inclusive of any team meetings, preparation, publicity etc).
      • Skills audit completed during initial training.
      • 1500-2000 word assignment or blog.
      • Presentation materials – these will be assessed at the time of the presentation, but need to be included within the portfolio for moderation purposes.
      The presentation<br />Students will be required to deliver a presentation demonstrating their understanding of the links between the skills developed and employability criteria required by employers.<br />Grading:<br />The four components of the award include:<br />
      • Evidence of at least 20 hours of Peer Assisted Learning leadership related activity (inclusive of any team meetings, preparation, publicity etc).
      • Skills audit completed during initial training
      • 1500-2000 word assignment or blog
      • Presentation
      Students who achieve a Pass within each of the components outlined above will receive the Leicester Award for Employability.<br />Students who do not achieve a Pass within one or more of the above components will not be eligible for the Award.<br />Further details of assessment components:<br />1) Evidence of at least 20 hours of Peer Assisted Learning leadership related activity<br />Please provide evidence of at least 20 hours of Peer Assisted Learning leadership related activity (inclusive of any team meetings, preparation, publicity etc).<br />This should consist of:<br />
      • Evidence of the intervention/activity such as your PAL activity log, confirmation of room bookings, sign-in sheets or photos of face to face sessions; links to or screenshots of IT mediated support; links to/screenshots or physical examples of resource(s) developed. (Essential)
      • Submitted project proposal and the project updates submitted to the facilitator. (Essential)
      • Any other relevant materials evidencing the intervention/activity such as evidence of needs analysis and participant feedback, meeting minutes, project plans etc.(Optional, but inclusion of additional materials is likely to contribute to a higher grade.)
      Criteria: <br />Evidence of at least 20 hours of Peer Assisted Learning leadership related activity.PASS/FAILExcellent, well thought through quality of intervention evidenced, with clear reference to needs analysis.5  4  3  2  1  0Intervention is of poor quality with no consideration given to needs analysis.Logically organised and excellently presented portfolio.5  4  3  2  1  0Portfolio lacks organisation and/or is poorly presented.<br />4 marks or above are needed for a Pass in this section.<br />Additional comments: you will need to pass the first criterion in order to be eligible for the Peer Assisted Learning Leicester Award. <br />2) Skills audit completed during initial training <br />Criteria:<br />Skills audit presentPASS/FAIL<br />3) An assignment or blog, 1500-2000 words, capturing the criteria set out below:<br />Part 1 (project evaluation)Based on your experience of running the project, provide an honest and reflective evaluation of the various stages of the project, focusing on:<br />the positive aspects of the project, both in terms of the project outcomes, and in terms of the way in which the team worked to achieve these outcomes;<br />areas which could be improved upon and explanation of why these are significant;<br />choose one key aspect of team-based project work, and explain what you have learned about this, based on your experiences and observations.<br />Criteria:<br />Positive aspects of project clearly identified, together with evidence of project outcomes and clear explanation(s) of how the team worked to achieve these.5  4  3  2  1  0No evidence of discussion of positive aspects of the project or outcomes, or how the team worked.Areas for improvement, together with explanation for significance clearly articulated.5  4  3  2  1  0No mention of areas for improvement and/or no explanation of significance.Detailed and insightful discussion of one key aspect of team-based project work, explaining what has been learned, with clear references to experiences and observations.5  4  3  2  1  0No evidence of discussion of key aspect and what has been learned and/or no linkage to experience or observation.<br />6 marks or above are needed for a Pass in this section.<br />Part 2 (personal reflection)With specific reference to the skills and attributes audit you completed, reflect on the what you have learned about yourself (including skills and attributes developed), as a result of undertaking the project. Focus on:<br />skills and attributes developed (you must provide clear and plausible evidence for these);<br />any changes you have noticed in the way you act, think about, or approach project work, working with others, problem-solving etc;<br />how you would approach tasks differently in light of what you have learned about yourself and observed through experience;<br />priorities for further development in future together with an explanation of why these are significant from the point of view of your employability.<br />Criteria:<br />Skills and attributes clearly identified (with reference to audit) together with clear and plausible evidence for development.5  4  3  2  1  0Skills and attributes not identified and/or no evidence for development provided.Clear statement of how tasks would be approached differently in future in light of what has been learned and observed through experience.5  4  3  2  1  0No statement of how tasks would be approached differently and/or no linkage to what has been learned or observed through experience.Priorities for further development clearly articulated, together with clear explanation of significance.5  4  3  2  1  0No priorities articulated and/or no explanation of significance provided.<br />6 marks or above are needed for a Pass in this section.<br />4) Presentation addressing the following brief:<br />For this task you are asked to think about how the skills you have developed, and the experiences you have undertaken as a PAL leader are relevant to the world of employment. You will be assessed on your ability to:<br />identify and research a specialty;<br />articulate the ways in which the skills and experiences you’ve gained are relevant to your chosen specialty.<br />Presentation length: 10 minsTime for questions 5 mins(in addition to giving a presentation you will be required to ask two questions of your peers)In order to prepare your presentation you will need to:<br />identify a specialty in which you are interested in seeking employment in the future;<br />identity the main skills and attributes that the specialty requires;<br />think about how far your work as a PAL leader has provided you with evidence of these skills, attributes and experiences.<br />Your presentation should include the following:<br />a brief description of the specialty you have selected;<br />an explanation as to why you selected it (What attracted you to it? Does it relate to existing career objectives?)<br />evidence that you have researched the skills and attributes that the specialty requires;<br />a clear articulation (backed up by strong and plausible evidence) of how the being a PAL leader has contributed to providing you with skills, attributes and experiences relevant to the specialty;<br />what further action do you plan to take in order to strengthen your skills and attributes, and how will you know you are developing and improving?<br />Criteria:<br />General presentation skillsExcellent pace and volume, suited to the audience and location.5  4  3  2  1  0Inappropriate pace and volume.Appropriate, confident and well judged body language and eye contact. 5  4  3  2  1  0Inappropriate/lack of appropriate body language and eye contact.Presentation logically structured with a clear introduction, conclusion and signposting throughout.5  4  3  2  1  0Poor or no clear structure to the presentation.Clear and aesthetically designed visual aids, utilising appropriate formats for communicating information (e.g. text, images, graphs, diagrams)5  4  3  2  1  0Poorly designed visual aids with little or no thought given to appropriate format for communicating information.Presentation well timed and delivered within the timeframe specified.5  4  3  2  1  0Evidence of poor timing; presentation overran or delivered within a significantly shorter timeframe than specified.Specific content criteriaDescription of specialty selected, and clear and persuasive justification given for the choice made.5  4  3  2  1  0No clear description of specialty selected and/or no clear justification given for the choice made.Evidence of thorough research of the skills and attributes required for selected specialty.5  4  3  2  1  0No evidence of research of skills and attributes required for selected specialty.A clear articulation of how PAL-related skills, attributes and experiences will contribute to fulfilling the role.5  4  3  2  1  0PAL-related skills, attributes and experiences not mentioned or not related to specified role.Further action for strengthening skills and attributes, and criteria by which to judge improvement clearly articulated.5  4  3  2  1  0Action for strengthening skills and attributes and/or criteria by which to judge improvement not articulated.<br />10 marks or above within the ‘General Presentations Skills’ section and 8 marks or above within the ‘Specific Content Criteria’ section are needed for a Pass.<br />