• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
The Food Service Supply Chain: You are Only as Good as Your Weakest Link

The Food Service Supply Chain: You are Only as Good as Your Weakest Link



Food safety expert and food poison attorney Bill Marler's presentation on the importance of maintaining a food supply chain dedicated to food safety. Marler uses case examples from his nearly 20 ...

Food safety expert and food poison attorney Bill Marler's presentation on the importance of maintaining a food supply chain dedicated to food safety. Marler uses case examples from his nearly 20 years of experience as a food poisoning lawyer to show the dangers of a faulty supply chain.



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



4 Embeds 526

http://www.marlerblog.com 520
url_unknown 4
http://translate.googleusercontent.com 1
http://www.slideshare.net 1



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    The Food Service Supply Chain: You are Only as Good as Your Weakest Link The Food Service Supply Chain: You are Only as Good as Your Weakest Link Presentation Transcript

    • The Foodservice Supply ChainYou are only as good as your weakest link
    • Food Production is a Risky Business
      Competitive Markets
      Wall Street, Stockholder and Management Pressures for Increasing Profits
      Lack of Clear Rewards for Marketing and Practicing Food Safety
      Risk of Litigation
    • To Put Things in Perspective
      According to the CDC, microbial pathogens in food cause an estimated 48 million case of human illness annually in the United States
      125,000 hospitalized
      3,000 deaths
      Foodborne Illness in United States cost $152,000,000,000 yearly – PEW
      That cost includes doctor and hospital visits, medications, lost wages and productivity, functional disabilities, and death
      It does not include recall cost, price of litigation or loss of reputation
    • A Legal Lesson – Strict Product Liability
      Strict Liability – Three Questions
      Are you a manufacturer?
      Was the product unsafe?
      Did the product cause injury?
    • Who is a Manufacturer?
      “A manufacturer is defined as a product seller who designs, produces, makes, fabricates, constructs, or remanufacturers the relevant product or component part of a product before its sale to a user or consumer.”
      Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co., 120 Wn.2d 246 (1992).
    • Was the Product Unsafe?
      Proving a Product is Unsafe = Defective
      Was the product unsafe beyond that which is expected by a reasonable consumer?
      Did the product deviate in some material way from specifications?
      Was the product not reasonably safe as it was designed?
      Was the product not reasonably safe due to a failure to warn or instruct?
    • Did the Product Cause Injury?
      You tell me:
    • It’s the Product not the Conduct
      The focus is on the product; not the conduct
      It is called Strict Liability for a Reason:
      The only defense is prevention
      It does not matter if you took all reasonable precautions
      If you manufacturer a product that makes someone sick you are going to pay
    • Why Strict Liability?
      Puts pressure on those (manufacturers) that most likely could correct the problem in the first place
      Puts the cost of settlements and verdicts directly onto those (manufacturers) that profit from the product – cost shifting
      Creates incentive not to let it happen again
    • Worthless Excuse Number 1
      “I never read that memo”
      If a document contains damning information, the jury will assume you read it, understood it, and ignored it
    • Odwalla
    • Odwalla
    • Jack in the Box
    • Jack in the Box
    • Jack in the Box
    • ConAgra 2002 – Hard Lesson No. 1
      On June 30, 2002, the USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service announced the recall of 354,200 pounds of ground beef manufactured at the ConAgra
      The contaminated ground beef was produced at the plant on May 31, thirty days prior to the recall, and was distributed nationally to retailers and institutions
    • ConAgra 2002 – Hard Lesson No. 1
      E. coli O157:H7 was found at the Greeley slaughterhouse on May 9, 2002, yet they apparently did nothing with this information. The bacteria were detected several more times at the slaughterhouse over the next month, the last time being June 20, 2002
      Over 19 Million Pounds of meat recalled
      More than 40 sickened, 5 HUS and 1 Death
      In November 2002, the ConAgra plant in Greeley closed, due to repeated failures to prevent fecal contamination of carcasses
    • ConAgra 2004-2007 – Hard Lesson No. 2
      CDC Figures as of June 2007:
      714 culture-positive illnesses from 44 states – estimate 38.6 times more ill
      71 hospitalizations
      Illnesses reported from 2005 to late 2007
    • ConAgra – Inspection Report 2005
      “Inspection revealed the following concerns:
      Two areas on production lines where filled containers of peanut butter were not completely covered from overhead contamination, an accumulation of spillage and or dust at wall/floor juncture around air handling cabinet in the ingredients room, and a temporary baffle made of cardboard in use on an empty jar line”
    • ConAgra – Inspection Report 2005
      “. . . Inspection found the lot in question had been shipped and management cited corporate policy in refusing to allow review of production and shipping records
      The current inspection was conducted in response to several complaints including most recently, number 29134, an anonymous complaint alleging poor sanitation, poor facilities maintenance, and poor quality program management. Specifics in that complaint include an alleged episode of positive findings of Salmonella in peanut butter in October of 200 …
    • 2009 – Peanut Butter Again?
      Over 700 SalmonellaTyphimuriumreported from 46 states
      Over 150 people hospitalized
      Nine Deaths
      Over 4,000 products recalled
      Criminal Prosecution?
      Declaratory Judgment
      Massive Recall Costs
    • The Supply Chain is very, very, Long
      German E. coli O104:H4 Outbreak
      4,200 sick (6 in U.S.), 900 with HUS (3 in U.S.) and 50 deaths (1 in U.S.)
      Egyptian Fenugreek Seeds, German and British vendors
      Seeds in U.S.?
    • Sprouts – just don’t serve them!
    • Planning against Litigation – What’s Important?
      Identify Hazards
      Do you have qualified and committed people?
      What is your Food Safety Culture?
      Are Vendors and Suppliers Involved?
      Do they have a plan?
      Do they have a culture?
      Ever visit them?
      Contractual Indemnity?
    • Lessons Learned from an Outbreak
      You can insure the brand’s and the company’s reputation
      Arm yourself with good current information
      Since you have a choice between doing nothing and being proactive, be proactive
      Make food safety a part of everything your do
      Treat your customers with respect
    • Questions?
      A couple of Resources:
      Marler Blog
      Food Safety News
      Outbreak Database