Learning Objects and Web 2.0: Technologies in Search of Pedagogy

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Learning Objects and Web 2.0: Technologies in Search of Pedagogy - Presentation Transcript

    1. Mark Bullen LALCO 2008 Aguascalientes, México
    2. Introduction
      • Not a learning objects expert
      • Expertise in DE, e-learning
      • Sophisticated user
      • Perspectives of an outsider
    3. Premise
      • Learning objects emerged from the WWW
      • Social software and Web 2.0 are also products of the Internet
      • Neither began with an educational purpose
      • Both are technologies in search of educational purpose
    4. Premise
      • Underlying ideology is learner-centered and, in many ways, anti-institutional
      • Driven by a non-formal view of learning
      • Opposed to the prevailing content, teacher and institution-centered notions of education
    5. Premise
      • Need to approach these technologies critically and skeptically
    6. Learning Objects: Beyond Technology
      • More than creating reusable digital learning resources
      • About creating a truly learner-centered educational system
      • More than a technological innovation: a pedagogical innovation
    7. The Reality of Institutional Education
      • An idealistic view of education
      • Two problems:
        • Formal education is credential-driven
        • Depends on widespread development and sharing of objects
    8. Our Educational System
      • Primarily formal
      • Driven by credentials
      • Learners tend to be instrumental
    9. Development and Sharing
      • Who is developing learning objects?
      • Who is sharing learning objects
      • Who is using learning objects?
      • Examples
        • UBC: Master of Educational Technology
        • UBC: German Reading course
        • BCIT: Faculty collective agreement
    10. Development & Sharing
      • Open access
      • Opening Up Education – Iiyoshi & Kumar
      • The jury is still out on the sustainability of OEC (C. Mackie)
        • Faculty lose revenue, career rewards
        • Content requires refinement
        • Copyright clearance
        • No tangible benefit to creator or creator’s institution
    11. Learning Objects: Beyond Technology
      • A technology in search of educational purpose
      • Pedagogical innovation ignores reality
      • Significant barriers to a learning objects pedagogy
    12. A Functionalist Approach to Learning Objects
      • Technical benefits of sharing can be harnessed without subscribing to the new pedagogy
      • Reusability can be applied on an institutional or program level
      • Trades and vocational training
      • In other words we can have the technical innovation without the pedagogical innovation
      • Global sharing, OEC approach is unrealistic
    13. Web 2.0: From Transmission to Participation
      • From learning objects to Web 2.0
      • Similar story
      • Learning objects about exploiting the distributive capability of the Internet
      • Web 2.0 about exploiting the networking and collaborative capabilitie
    14. Web 2.0: From Transmission to Participation
      • User-generated content
      • The power (or wisdom) of the crowd
      • Data on an epic scale
      • Architecture of participation
      • Network effects
      • Openness
    15. Web 2.0: From Transmission to Participation
      • Web 2.0 not educational
      • Collaborative, social and networked nature attract educators
      • Wikis, blogs, RSS, social networking sites allow for easy generation and sharing of content
      • But too often technology is driving the pedagogy
    16. Web 2.0: From Transmission to Participation
      • Need to separate experimentation from sound instructional planning
      • Web 2.0 favors collaboration but there are times when transmission is necessary
      • Wisdom of the crowd is given equal status to wisdom of the wise
    17. Web 2.0: From Transmission to Participation
      • Disintermediation of information is seen as a victory for the individual
    18. The Net Generation Myth
      • Web 2.0 use in education driven by net generation hype
      • Research-based evidence is lacking
      • In fact research tends to show the opposite: that current generation is not technologically savvy
    19. Conclusion
      • Pedagogy before technology
      • Educational change must be driven by need
      • Need must be clearly identified
      • Change should not be driven by the technology

    + Mark BullenMark Bullen, 6 months ago

    custom

    566 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Presentation to the LALCO 2008 conference, Aguascal more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 566
      • 566 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 10
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories