Fundamental rights in the administrative process
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Fundamental rights in the administrative process

on

  • 1,573 views

This presentation examines the impact of European and ECHR human rights in the administrative process

This presentation examines the impact of European and ECHR human rights in the administrative process

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,573
Views on SlideShare
1,573
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
9
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Fundamental rights in the administrative process Presentation Transcript

  • 1. Fundamental rights in the administrative process
    Dr. Mariolina Eliantonio, LL.M.
    Maastricht University
  • 2. Outline
    Application of fundamental rights by the administrative courts
    EU human rights
    ECHR human rights
    Respect of fundamental rights by the administrative courts
    EU human rights
    ECHR human rights
  • 3. 1. Application of fundamental rights by the administrative courts
    • EU human rights
    In ECJ’s case law
    In Charter
    When applicable?
    When EU law is at stake!
    • ECHR human rights
    Depending on the value of the ECHR in the national legal systems
  • 4. EU human rights: ECJ’s case law
    Treaty of Rome: focus on economic integration, no mention of human rights
    Stauder (1969): human rights are ‘enshrined in the general principles of Community law and protected by the Court’
    Rutili (1975): EU human rights are binding on the Member States
  • 5. EU human rights: Charter
    Binding since Lisbon Treaty...
    ... for EU institutions and for Member States
  • 6. Article 51: Charter of Fundamental Rights is binding upon the Member States when they are implementing Union law (‘They shall therefore respect the rights, observe the principles and promote the application thereof in accordance with their respective powers’).
    EU human rights: Charter
  • 7. When are EU human rights applicable before national courts?
    ... when they are implementing EU law (ECJ’s case law + Article 51 Charter)
    What does it mean?
    • When an administrative act is financed by the EU?
    • 8. Only strict implementation?
    • 9. If there is a connection between national act and EU law?
  • When are EU humanrightsapplicablebeforenationalcourts?
     ECJ's case law: 2 phases
    strict interpretation: fundamental rights may be invoked against acts of public authorities when they apply EU law
    broad interpretation: fundamental rights must be respected by administrative authorities when they act within the field of EU law
    Conclusion
    ECJ’s case law is vague
    Article 51 did not clarify the issue
  • 10. When are EU humanrightsapplicablebeforenationalcourts?
    From the perspective of HR protection, broad interpretation is desirable: national administrations act as EU administration when they act within the framework of EU law so HR binding when...
    act applies EU law
    matter is governed by EU law
    aim of the measure is to fulfil EU obligations
    act pursues the objective of an EU policy
    act inhibits the achievement of an EU objective
  • 11. When are EU humanrightsapplicablebeforenationalcourts?
    Role of national administrative courts?
    Control whether the rights contained in the Charter are violated by national administrative authorities when
    they are acting within the scope of EU law
    they are derogating from EU law (Schmidtberger)
  • 12. ECHR human rights
    Application and relevance depends on the value of the ECHR in the national legal systems
    E.g. in Germany more reliance on constitutional human rights
    E.g. in NL strong reliance on ECHR and intense application by courts
  • 13. 2. Respectof fundamental rights by the administrative courts
    EU human rights
    In ECJ’s case law
    Right to effective judicial protection
    In primary law
    In Charter
    ECHR human rights
    Article 6 ECHR
    Applicability
    Content
  • 14. EU human rights: ECJ’s case law
    Principle of national procedural autonomy
    When enforcing EU law before national courts, national procedural rules are applicable subject to…
    Principle of equivalence: procedural rules used to enforce European law should not be less favourable than those used to enforce national law
    Principle of effectiveness: procedural rules should not make it impossible or excessively difficult to enforce EC law in national courts
    Right to effective judicial protection
  • 15. Effective judicial protection
    National procedural rules must respect principles of equivalence and effectivess
    Rules on…
    Access to court (Borelli, Verholen)
    Time limits (Santex)
    Ex officio application of EU law (Peterbroeck, Van Schijndel, Vandeweerd)
    Interim relief (Factortame, Zuckerfabrik, Atlanta)
    Evidence regime (San Giorgio)

    National administrative courts must set national procedural rules aside
  • 16. EU human rights: primary law
    Article 19 TEU: Member States shall provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law
  • 17. EU human rights: Charter
    Article 47
    Everyone whose rights and freedoms guaranteed the law of the Union are violated has the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal...
    Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law...
    Legal aid shall be made available ... in so fas as ... necessary to ensure access to justice
  • 18. ECHR human rights: Article 6
    Article 6: fair trial
    In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an impartial tribunal established by law
    Is it applicable to administrative trial?
    What does it entail?
    Access to court
    Fair trial
  • 19. Is Article 6 applicable?
    Proceedings for permission, licence or other act of a public authority which forms a condition for the legality of a contract to be concluded by a private party (Ringeisen v. Austria)
    Proceedings which may lead to the cancellation or suspension by a public authority of the qualification for practising a profession or carrying on an economic activity (König v. Germany)
    Proceedings concerning the granting or revocation of a licence by a public authority which is required for setting up or carrying on a certain economic activity (Pudas v. Sweden)
    Exclusion for
    disputes relating to tax law (Ferrazzini v. Italy)
    admission and expulsion of aliens (Maaouia v. France)
    civil service law (Pellegrin v. France)
  • 20. The right of access to court
    Golder: access to court is implied in fair trial
    Airey: requirement of effectiveness
    Le Compte: full jurisdiction of the court to rule on the facts and on the law
    However: restraint on factual review is acceptable if full review has been carried out by the administrative authorities
  • 21. The right to fair trial
    Equality of arms
    Each party must be given reasonable opportunity to present his case under conditions which do not place him at a substantial disadvantage vis-á-vis his opponent (Kress v. France)
    Possibility to be informed and be able to challenge the reasons for an administrative measure (Hentrich v. France)
    Court appointed expert must be neutral (Eggertsdottir v. Iceland)
    Unequal time limits may be breach of equality of arms (Platakou v. Greece)
  • 22. The right to fair trial
    Adversarial proceedings
    Opportunity for the parties to have knowledge on and comment on all evidence adduced or observations filed (Vermeulen v. Belgium)
  • 23. Future prospects and challenges?
    EU human rights: application
    When are EU human rights applicable?
    What is the added value of the Charter?
    EU human rights: respect
    What is the added value of Article 19 TEU?
    What is the added value of Article 47 Charter?
    How to judge equivalence and effectiveness?
    How to prevent discrimination?
    Should we have a European Code of Administrative Procedure?
  • 24. Thank you for your attention!
    Every remark, question, comment or suggestion is welcome atm.eliantonio@maastrichtuniversity.nl