Potato Chips Powerpoint
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Potato Chips Powerpoint

on

  • 12,513 views

An experiement done on Potato Chips and if people could tell the difference between brands.

An experiement done on Potato Chips and if people could tell the difference between brands.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
12,513
Views on SlideShare
12,484
Embed Views
29

Actions

Likes
4
Downloads
411
Comments
0

2 Embeds 29

http://www.slideshare.net 27
http://translate.googleusercontent.com 2

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Potato Chips Powerpoint Potato Chips Powerpoint Presentation Transcript

    • POTATO CHIPS
    • About Our Experiment Four brands of chips  Blind and non-blind  taste tests
    • Hypotheses Hypothesis 1 – Consumers' taste ratings  for the same potato chips will differ when the product brand is made apparent and when not. Hypothesis 2 – The majority of consumers  will not be able to distinguish the difference between brands purely through a taste test.
    • Variables Independent Dependant  Flavor  Taste Preference  Brand  Brand Preference  Packaging  Characteristic Preference  Texture/Structure of Chip
    • Procedure Experimentation set-up: Samples were  placed on numbered paper plates (numbers 1 to 4) in order from left to right.  Pre-experiment debriefing: Participants in groups of 4 or 5. Experiment done.  Experiment execution: After concluding the second tasting, surveyors were asked to complete the final form.
    • Surveys
    • Survey #1 1) How would you rate the aroma of the chip? Very Bad Very Good Chip 1: 1 2 3 4 5 Chip 2: 1 2 3 4 5 Chip 3: 1 2 3 4 5 Chip 4: 1 2 3 4 5 2) How would you rate the thickness of the chip? Don’t Care Chip 1: Too thin Just Right Too Thick Don’t Care Chip 2: Too thin Just Right Too Thick Don’t Care Chip 3: Too thin Just Right Too Thick Don’t Care Chip 4: Too thin Just Right Too Thick
    • Survey #2 What brand of chips do you usually purchase? Why? Lays Old Dutch Tim’s No Name Other, Please specify: __________________ _____________________________________________________________________ Rank the top 3 factors that would influence your purchase:  Physical Appearance of the Chip Variety of Flavors  Thickness Packaging  Crispiness Convenience  Taste Pricing  Sound Nutrition Levels  Smell Others, Please Specify
    • Results Results without seeing brand Generally high scores  Scores are scattered  Difficult to distinguish  preference  Results with seeing brand Scores are closer to each  other Change in aroma and  thickness scores  Pattern in the scores 
    • Purchase Intention Purchase Intention Chip 1 Purchase Intention Chip 4 (No- (Lays) name) 5 5 4.5 4.5 4 4 3.28 3.19 3.5 3.5 2.96 3 3 Rating Rating 2.50 2.5 2.5 Blind Test Blind Test 2 2 Non-Blind Test Non-Blind Test 1.5 1.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 0 0 Purchase intention scores are based on survey questions 6 & 9  Scores from the blind and non-blind test are compared  Slight increases in purchase intention for the Lays brand  Similar results for other branded chips such as Old Dutch  Intention decreases for generic branded chips  Respondents are less likely to purchase generic branded chips
    • Brand Identification Brand Identification (Of consumer-indicated favorites included in survey) 38% Incorrectly Identified 62%
    • Limitations Population:  Sample size   Population uniform Participants:  Hypothesis guessing   Un-isolated participants Experiment set-up:  Variety of Brands   Tasting order  Flavor variety
    • Experiment Recap Results Inferences Increasing purchase Consumer preference is   intentions for heavily reliant on the brand Lays, decreasing purchase intentions for Tim’s and no- name Consumers can’t  Participants could not distinguish chip brands by  identify their preferred taste alone brand when blindfolded
    • Managerial Implications
    • Thanks for Listening!