Like this presentation? Why not share!

- Lecture 4: The Weka Package by Marina Santini 843 views
- L4. Ensembles of Decision Trees by Machine Learning ... 182 views
- Lecture8 multi class_svm by Stéphane Canu 277 views
- 03 conditional random field by zukun 1041 views
- Machine learning Lecture 4 by Srinivasan R 2122 views
- Conditional Random Fields by lswing 3125 views

919

-1

-1

Published on

No Downloads

Total Views

919

On Slideshare

0

From Embeds

0

Number of Embeds

3

Shares

0

Downloads

37

Comments

0

Likes

3

No embeds

No notes for slide

- 1. Lecture 2: Decision Trees – Nearest Neighbors Last Updated: 09 Sept 2013 Uppsala University Department of Linguistics and Philology, September 2013 Machine Learning for Language Technology (Schedule) 1 Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors
- 2. Most slides from previous courses (i.e. from E. Alpaydin and J. Nivre) with adaptations 2 Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors
- 3. Supervised Classification 3 Divide instances into (two or more) classes Instance (feature vector): Features may be categorical or numerical Class (label): Training data: Classification in Language Technology Spam filtering (spam vs. non-spam) Spelling error detection (error vs. no error) Text categorization (news, economy, culture, sport, ...) Named entity classification (person, location, organization, ...) X {xt ,yt }t 1 N x x1, , xm y Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors
- 4. Concept=the thing to be learned (here, how to decide the genre of a new webpage); Instances=examples (here a webpage) Features=attributes (here morphological features, normalized counts) Classes=labels (here webgenres) Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors4
- 5. Format for the software you chose (here arff) Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors5
- 6. Models for Classification 6 Generative probabilistic models: Model of P(x, y) Naive Bayes Conditional probabilistic models: Model of P(y | x) Logistic regression (next time) Discriminative model: No explicit probability model Decision trees, nearest neighbor classification (today) Perceptron, support vector machines, MIRA (next time) Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors
- 7. Repeating… Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors7 Noise Data cleaning is expensive and time consuming Margin Inductive bias Types of inductive biases •Minimum cross-validation error •Maximum margin •Minimum description length •[...]
- 8. Decision Trees Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors8
- 9. Decision Trees 9 Hierarchical tree structure for classification Each internal node specifies a test of some feature Each branch corresponds to a value for the tested feature Each leaf node provides a classification for the instance Represents a disjunction of conjunctions of constraints Each path from root to leaf specifies a conjunction of tests The tree itself represents the disjunction of all paths Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors
- 10. Decision Tree Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors10
- 11. Divide and Conquer Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors11 Internal decision nodes Univariate: Uses a single attribute, xi Numeric xi : Binary split : xi > wm Discrete xi : n-way split for n possible values Multivariate: Uses all attributes, x Leaves Classification: class labels (or proportions) Regression: r average (or local fit) Learning: Greedy recursive algorithm Find best split X = (X1, ..., Xp), then induce tree for each Xi
- 12. Classification Trees (ID3, CART, C4.5) Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors12 ˆP Ci | x,m pm i Nm i Nm For node m, Nm instances reach m, Ni m belong to Ci Node m is pure if pi m is 0 or 1 Measure of impurity is entropy Im pm i log2 pm i i 1 K
- 13. Example: Entropy 13 Assume two classes (C1, C2) and four instances (x1, x2, x3, x4) Case 1: C1 = {x1, x2, x3, x4}, C2 = { } Im = – (1 log 1 + 0 log 0) = 0 Case 2: C1 = {x1, x2, x3}, C2 = {x4} Im = – (0.75 log 0.75 + 0.25 log 0.25) = 0.81 Case 3: C1 = {x1, x2}, C2 = {x3, x4} Im = – (0.5 log 0.5 + 0.5 log 0.5) = 1 Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors
- 14. Best Split Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors14 ˆP Ci |x,m, j pmj i Nmj i Nmj If node m is pure, generate a leaf and stop, otherwise split with test t and continue recursively Find the test that minimizes impurity Impurity after split with test t: Nmj of Nm take branch j Ni mj belong to Ci Im t Nmj Nmj 1 n pmj i log2 pmj i i 1 K Im pm i log2 pm i i 1 K ˆP Ci | x,m pm i Nm i Nm
- 15. Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors15
- 16. Information Gain Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors16 We want to determine which attribute in a given set of training feature vectors is most usefulfor discriminating between the classes to be learned. •Information gain tells us how important a given attribute of the feature vectors is. •We will use it to decide the ordering of attributes in the nodes of a decision tree.
- 17. Information Gain and Gain Ratio 17 Choosing the test that minimizes impurity maximizes the information gain (IG): Information gain prefers features with many values The normalized version is called gain ratio (GR): Im t Nmj Nmj 1 n pmj i log2 pmj i i 1 K IGm t Im Im t Vm t Nmj Nm log2 Nmj Nmj 1 n GRm t IGm t Vm t Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors Im pm i log2 pm i i 1 K
- 18. Pruning Trees Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors18 Decision trees are susceptible to overfitting Remove subtrees for better generalization: Prepruning: Early stopping (e.g., with entropy threshold) Postpruning: Grow whole tree, then prune subtrees Prepruning is faster, postpruning is more accurate (requires a separate validation set)
- 19. Rule Extraction from Trees Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors 19 C4.5Rules (Quinlan, 1993)
- 20. Learning Rules Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors20 Rule induction is similar to tree induction but tree induction is breadth-first rule induction is depth-first (one rule at a time) Rule learning: A rule is a conjunction of terms (cf. tree path) A rule covers an example if all terms of the rule evaluate to true for the example (cf. sequence of tests) Sequential covering: Generate rules one at a time until all positive examples are covered IREP (Fürnkrantz and Widmer, 1994), Ripper (Cohen, 1995)
- 21. Properties of Decision Trees 21 Decision trees are appropriate for classification when: Features can be both categorical and numeric Disjunctive descriptions may be required Training data may be noisy (missing values, incorrect labels) Interpretation of learned model is important (rules) Inductive bias of (most) decision tree learners: 1. Prefers trees with informative attributes close to the root 2. Prefers smaller trees over bigger ones (with pruning) 3. Preference bias (incomplete search of complete Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors
- 22. k-Nearest Neighbors Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors22
- 23. Nearest Neighbor Classification 23 An old idea Key components: Storage of old instances Similarity-based reasoning to new instances This “rule of nearest neighbor” has considerable elementary intuitive appeal and probably corresponds to practice in many situations. For example, it is possible that much medical diagnosis is influenced by the doctor's recollection of the subsequent history of an earlier patient whose symptoms resemble in some way those of the current patient. (Fix and Hodges, 1952) Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors
- 24. k-Nearest Neighbour 24 Learning: Store training instances in memory Classification: Given new test instance x, Compare it to all stored instances Compute a distance between x and each stored instance xt Keep track of the k closest instances (nearest neighbors) Assign to x the majority class of the k nearest neighbours A geometric view of learning Proximity in (feature) space same class The smoothness assumption Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors
- 25. Eager and Lazy Learning 25 Eager learning (e.g., decision trees) Learning – induce an abstract model from data Classification – apply model to new data Lazy learning (a.k.a. memory-based learning) Learning – store data in memory Classification – compare new data to data in memory Properties: Retains all the information in the training set – no abstraction Complex hypothesis space – suitable for natural language? Main drawback – classification can be very inefficient Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors
- 26. Dimensions of a k-NN Classifier 26 Distance metric How do we measure distance between instances? Determines the layout of the instance space The k parameter How large neighborhood should we consider? Determines the complexity of the hypothesis space Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors
- 27. Distance Metric 1 27 Overlap = count of mismatching features (x,z) (xi,zi ) i 1 m ii ii ii ii ii zxif zxif elsenumericif zx zx 1 0 , minmax ),( Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors
- 28. Distance Metric 2 28 MVDM = Modified Value Difference Metric (x,z) (xi,zi ) i 1 m (xi,zi) P(Cj | xi) P(Cj | zi) j 1 K Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors
- 29. The k parameter 29 Tunes the complexity of the hypothesis space If k = 1, every instance has its own neighborhood If k = N, all the feature space is one neighborhood k = 1 k = 15 Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors ˆE E(h | V ) 1 h xt rt t 1 M
- 30. A Simple Example 30 Training set: 1. (a, b, a, c) A 2. (a, b, c, a) B 3. (b, a, c, c) C 4. (c, a, b, c) A New instance: 5. (a, b, b, a) Distances (overlap): Δ(1, 5) = 2 Δ(2, 5) = 1 Δ(3, 5) = 4 Δ(4, 5) = 3 k-NN classification: 1-NN(5) = B 2-NN(5) = A/B 3-NN(5) = A 4-NN(5) = A Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors (x,z) (xi,zi ) i 1 m ii ii ii ii ii zxif zxif elsenumericif zx zx 1 0 , minmax ),(
- 31. Further Variations on k-NN 31 Feature weights: The overlap metric gives all features equal weight Features can be weighted by IG or GR Weighted voting: The normal decision rule gives all neighbors equal weight Instances can be weighted by (inverse) distance Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors
- 32. Properties of k-NN 32 Nearest neighbor classification is appropriate when: Features can be both categorical and numeric Disjunctive descriptions may be required Training data may be noisy (missing values, incorrect labels) Fast classification is not crucial Inductive bias of k-NN: 1. Nearby instances should have the same label (smoothness) 2. All features are equally important (without feature weights) 3. Complexity tuned by the k parameter Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors
- 33. Reading Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors33 Alpaydin (2010): Ch. 3, 9 Daumé (2012): Ch. 1-2 Witten and Frank (2005): Ch. 2 Tom Mitchell (1997) Ch.3: Decision Tree Learning
- 34. End of Lecture 2 Thanks for your attention Lec 2: Decision Trees - Nearest Neighbors34

No public clipboards found for this slide

Be the first to comment