0
Environmental Scan
---
Strategic Planning 2009- 2010
•FT/FT Freshman – Fall 2008 Percentage ofTotal Enrollment
•6-YearGraduation Rates -- Fall 2003 Cohort
•Residential Student...
23%
15%
24%
23% 24%
22%
17%
18%
19%
USI IUPU -
Fort
Wayne
Ball State Indiana
State U.
Indiana
University
Purdue Southern
I...
35%
26%
43% 43%
73% 72%
45%
49%
47%
USI IUPU Fort
Wayne
*Ball State
(Fall 2002)
Indiana
State U.
Indiana
University
Purdue...
63%
20%
91%
73%
98%
89%
70%
79%
74%
28%
7%
43%
38% 36% 33% 30%
36%
31%
USI IUPU -
Fort
Wayne
Ball State Indiana
State U.
I...
9%
11% 11%
20%
17%
20%
25%
12%
15%
USI IUPU Fort
Wayne
Ball State Indiana
State U.
Indiana
University
Purdue Southern
Ill ...
88%
96%
73%
66%
71% 72% 69%
86%
94%
46%
58%
28% 26% 24% 24% 23%
48% 45%
USI IUPU Fort
Wayne
Ball State Indiana
State U.
In...
78%
96%
64%
53%
61%
51%
81% 80%
85%
74%
63%
42%
25%
32% 30%
45%
60%
41%
USI IUPU Fort
Wayne
Ball State Indiana
State U.
In...
Name of Institution # ofTransfer Students
1 IvyTech Community College – Evansville Campus 120
2 Vincennes University 117
3...
22
17 16
18 18
14
17 16
19
USI IUPU Fort
Wayne
Ball State Indiana
State U.
Indiana
University
Purdue Southern
Ill U.
Murra...
•For Students
•For Programs
•USI Programs in proposal stage for 2009- 2011 implementation
The % of students who sent SAT scores to USI and
other schools when applying for colleges
 45% IU Bloomington
 39% Ball ...
 Additional bachelor degrees atVincennes U
 Education, Nursing,Technology
• Indiana State University online-only program...
 Undergraduate
 Anthropology
 Arts & Heritage
Management
 Biochemistry*
 Business Economics
 Business/Engineering
 ...
•Top 10 Higher Education State Policy Issues for 2010
•Top 10 national trends for higher education
•Impact of the Spelling...
1. States’ fiscal crises
2. President Obama’s American Graduation Initiative
(lead the world in college grads by 2010 & al...
1. Students as Early Adopters: Adults ages 18–26 are typically the
first to adopt new technologies and their schools to ha...
4. Enrollment, retention, and branding: Growing recognition
that the Internet is a viable way to market academic programs ...
7. Evolution of teaching and learning: Ongoing evolution from one-
to-one (teacher to student) to collaborative learning. ...
9. Strategic plans and technology: Budget and efficiency are ongoing
concerns in higher education. “Cloud computing”—a pro...
 A significant push to expand access, by reducing academic
and non-academic barriers to entry.
 Performance based outcom...
 CTL is a list of courses that will transfer among all Indiana public colleges &
universities.
 Over 80 courses have bee...
•NationalTrends
•USI Enrollment in Distance Education Courses
•USI Distance Education Offerings
•USI Degrees available pri...
 Increased competition for online courses from for-profits
and certification entities (ex.University of Phoenix)
 Softwa...
293 432
731
981
1196
1538
2009
2421
2815
3101 3223
3560
3804
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
# of students taking...
42
132 152
204
321
426
503
642
723
807
874
950
1009
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
# of USI students enrolled in only DE cour...
83
133
158
183 178 188
208
298 298
246
324
367
408
338 338 338 342 335
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
# of unique DE...
 Undergraduate Degree Programs
 Health Services
 Nursing
 Radiologic and Imaging Sciences
 Master’s Degree Programs
...
•Comparison of Indiana State Schools –Tuition versus StateAppropriations
•State Funding Issues
•Changes in State Funding F...
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
$18,000
$20,000
USI Indiana
State
Ball State Purdue IU
Tuit...
 Significant decrease in state funding for USI 2010-2011
biennium
 4.70% or 3.9 million dollars (including a 1-time reve...
• Increase in Degrees Incentive
• Time to Degree Incentive
• Low Income Degrees
• Enrollment/Successfully Completed Credit...
•External Grant Submissions
•External Grant Awards
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1998-1999
1999-2000
2000-2001
2001-2002
2001-2002
2002-2003
2003-2004
2004-2005
2006-2007
2...
$0
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
•Carnegie Foundation Classification
•Extended Services
•College Achievement Program
•Extended Services – Program Expansion...
 On December 18, 2008,The Carnegie Foundation for the
Advancement ofTeaching announced the University of
Southern Indiana...
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
977
1450
2000
2866
4355
6000
Enrollments Credit Hours
15
22 2630
39 42
65
90
114
0
20
40
6...
 1974 - Outreach programming beginning with the founding of
the Office of Continuing Educ.
 2000 – Evolved into the Divi...
 Higher Education Partner @ Innovation Point
 National SurfaceWarfare Center - Crane
 Town of New Harmony
 Indiana’s H...
Historic
Southern
Indiana
Applied
Research
Education
Services &
Partnerships
Continuing
Education
Human
Resource
Developme...
43 68 87
870
1736
2064
3 7 28
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2007 2008 2009
Faculty Students Staff
Division of Extended Services Innovative Approaches
Connect with Southern Indiana regional leadership development program
...
• Noncredit Enrollments15,000+
• Companies/Organizations Served
through Contracts93
• Contracts for Applied Research38
• C...
•5YearTrends in giving
•5 year private and public donations and grants
•Employee DonationTrends
 Average annual support raised over past 5 years = $8,454,670
 Private gift revenue is 6.7% of USI’s expenditures.This e...
FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009
Private Gifts $7,582,162 $9,520,151 $5,406,216 $6,819,452 $3,547,416
Lilly Endowme...
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
% of FT Adminstrators Donors
% of FT Faculty Donors
%...
•Employee Headcount
•Employee Ethnicity
•Employment Activity
•Retirement Forecast
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 % Increase
Support staff 337 335 349 359 357 6%
Administrative 226 240 252 262 266 18%
Faculty 31...
Faculty Administrative
Support
Staff
Nonresident alien 26 5 2
Black, non-Hispanic 4 7 11
American Indian/Alaska
Native
1 0...
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Support staff openings 75 95 97 64 53
Administrative openings 36 45 52 33 29
Total Non-Faculty Op...
Age Faculty Admin Support Total
60 - 64 30 20 31 81
65+ 20 5 6 31
Total 50 25 37 112
Total Employees 332 283 359 974
% 60+...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Environmental Scan (.pptx) - University of Southern Indiana

779

Published on

0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
779
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
7
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Environmental Scan (.pptx) - University of Southern Indiana"

  1. 1. Environmental Scan --- Strategic Planning 2009- 2010
  2. 2. •FT/FT Freshman – Fall 2008 Percentage ofTotal Enrollment •6-YearGraduation Rates -- Fall 2003 Cohort •Residential Students – Fall 2008 First-Time, First-Year & All Undergraduates •Undergraduate Minority Students -- Fall 2008 •Acceptance versus Enrollment – Fall 2008 First-Time, Full-Time Students •Acceptance versus Enrollment – Fall 2008Transfer Students •Top 10 universities USI students transfer from •Student / Faculty Ratio – Fall 2008
  3. 3. 23% 15% 24% 23% 24% 22% 17% 18% 19% USI IUPU - Fort Wayne Ball State Indiana State U. Indiana University Purdue Southern Ill U. Murray State Western Kentucky U.
  4. 4. 35% 26% 43% 43% 73% 72% 45% 49% 47% USI IUPU Fort Wayne *Ball State (Fall 2002) Indiana State U. Indiana University Purdue Southern Ill U. Murray State Western Kentucky U.
  5. 5. 63% 20% 91% 73% 98% 89% 70% 79% 74% 28% 7% 43% 38% 36% 33% 30% 36% 31% USI IUPU - Fort Wayne Ball State Indiana State U. Indiana University Purdue Southern Ill U. Murray State (Fall '07) Western Kentucky U. Freshman All Undergraduates
  6. 6. 9% 11% 11% 20% 17% 20% 25% 12% 15% USI IUPU Fort Wayne Ball State Indiana State U. Indiana University Purdue Southern Ill U. Murray State Western Kentucky U.
  7. 7. 88% 96% 73% 66% 71% 72% 69% 86% 94% 46% 58% 28% 26% 24% 24% 23% 48% 45% USI IUPU Fort Wayne Ball State Indiana State U. Indiana University Purdue Southern Ill U. Murray State Western Kentucky U. Acceptance Rate Enrolled Rate
  8. 8. 78% 96% 64% 53% 61% 51% 81% 80% 85% 74% 63% 42% 25% 32% 30% 45% 60% 41% USI IUPU Fort Wayne Ball State Indiana State U. Indiana University Purdue Southern Ill U. Murray State Western Kentucky U. Acceptance Rate Enrolled Rate
  9. 9. Name of Institution # ofTransfer Students 1 IvyTech Community College – Evansville Campus 120 2 Vincennes University 117 3 University of Evansville 52 4 Henderson Community College 44 5 Indiana University – BloomingtonCampus 40 6 Southeastern IllinoisCollege 33 7 IECCWabash Valley College 27 8 Indiana State University 27 9 Owensboro Community andTechnical College 27 10 Indiana Univ./Purdue Univ. Indianapolis 26 Total Fall 2009Transfer Students: 1200
  10. 10. 22 17 16 18 18 14 17 16 19 USI IUPU Fort Wayne Ball State Indiana State U. Indiana University Purdue Southern Ill U. Murray State Western Kentucky U.
  11. 11. •For Students •For Programs •USI Programs in proposal stage for 2009- 2011 implementation
  12. 12. The % of students who sent SAT scores to USI and other schools when applying for colleges  45% IU Bloomington  39% Ball State  30% Purdue -W. Lafayette  29% Indiana State University  26% IUPUI  20% University of Evansville  13% Vincennes University  12% University of Indianapolis  7% Butler University Source: College Board: 2009 College-Bound Seniors College/University Basic Report for USI
  13. 13.  Additional bachelor degrees atVincennes U  Education, Nursing,Technology • Indiana State University online-only programs  10 undergraduate, 7 Masters level, and 18 certificate programs • University of Evansville has some majors we do not offer:  Executive MBA, Civil/Electrical/Mechanical Engineering, Classical Studies, Environmental Administration, Latin American Studies, Music, Neuroscience, PhysicalTherapy doctoral degree, and Religion.
  14. 14.  Undergraduate  Anthropology  Arts & Heritage Management  Biochemistry*  Business Economics  Business/Engineering  Health Informatics  International Business  RespiratoryTherapy  Sports Management * Already approved by ICHE  Graduate  Communication  MSW in Administration  Special Education /Exceptional Needs
  15. 15. •Top 10 Higher Education State Policy Issues for 2010 •Top 10 national trends for higher education •Impact of the Spelling’s Report •Impact of the CoreTransfer Library
  16. 16. 1. States’ fiscal crises 2. President Obama’s American Graduation Initiative (lead the world in college grads by 2010 & all adults complete at least 1 year of college or training). 3. Tuition policies & price increases 4. Record enrollment 5. Reduced funding for state student aid programs 6. Focus on & expanded funding for community colleges 7. Expansion of statewide data systems and new reporting metrics 8. Veterans Education – Post 9/11 GI bill 9. Academically unprepared students 10. Concerns about K-12 teacher quality
  17. 17. 1. Students as Early Adopters: Adults ages 18–26 are typically the first to adopt new technologies and their schools to have the infrastructure to support the latest technologies. 2. Globalization: The demand for higher education globally has increased and will continue to grow and universities are competing internationally for resources, faculty, the best students, and education funding. Overseas expansion creates opportunities for students and faculty in terms of exchange programs and expanded campus environments. 3.Technical and information literacy: Ongoing need to create a campus culture that encourages faculty to use computers, smart devices, and other innovative tools in their curricula. Students may be device-savvy, but they may not necessarily be information-savvy. 21st CenturyTrends for Higher Education
  18. 18. 4. Enrollment, retention, and branding: Growing recognition that the Internet is a viable way to market academic programs to prospective students while enhancing the school’s brand. The presence of schools in virtual online communities such as Second Life helps enhance the brand and YouTube’s education channels and iTunes U are effective not only for teaching and learning, but also for marketing a university’s strengths. 5. Mobility: One-third of the 97 percent of college students who own a cell phone no longer use land lines to make voice calls. Tasks range from administrative (registration), to academic (downloading class materials), to social (instant messaging), to functional (checking transportation schedules), to keeping track of ideas (www.evernote.com). 6. Pedagogical centers and innovative campus commons Creating social gathering, computer gaming areas, and collaborative seating arrangements. Campus commons are evolving to become key locations where technologies can be showcased and explored. Top 10 NationalTrends in Higher Education (# 4 - 6)
  19. 19. 7. Evolution of teaching and learning: Ongoing evolution from one- to-one (teacher to student) to collaborative learning. Open source course-management systems such as Moodle (http://moodle.org) and similar systems on Facebook are just some applications being reconfigured to support more content and student Open-content initiatives—such as OpenCourseWare from MIT, and the Research Impact Initiative and open content website from UC Berkeley—continue to grow, along with book digitization programs first initiated by Google. 8. Collaboration: Universities are seeking new ways to facilitate collaboration to enhance research, classes, foreign exchanges, alumni relationships, and private sector partnerships.A variety of venues have emerged to make collaboration easier and more accessible by using virtual meeting-place and application-sharing tools such as Cisco® WebEx®TelePresence enables participants to conduct virtual meetings from nearly any location worldwide, creating a sense of “being there in-person.”Virtual locations in Second Life are creating alternative collaboration spaces, and emerging technologies are paving the way to integrate, or blend, virtual and physical realities.
  20. 20. 9. Strategic plans and technology: Budget and efficiency are ongoing concerns in higher education. “Cloud computing”—a process that allows files and data to be stored on a remote network using the Internet—is one approach that may potentially lower certain costs (e.g. IT). 10. Edutainment: Higher-education content and entertainment (edutainment) are becoming more intertwined. Professors are now using iTunes &YouTube podcasts videos that contain both educational and entertainment value. More than 120 schools have a presence in Second Life, using these virtual spaces for socializing, teaching, learning, and branding.
  21. 21.  A significant push to expand access, by reducing academic and non-academic barriers to entry.  Performance based outcome measures will increasingly be used to gauge effectiveness/funding allocations.  Called to produce innovation in pedagogies, technologies, and curricula (particularly in STEM).  http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/hiedfuture/reports/final-report.pdf USI is well positioned because of our niche as a high-access, affordable institution. We are continually improving quality, and are already innovative in these areas.
  22. 22.  CTL is a list of courses that will transfer among all Indiana public colleges & universities.  Over 80 courses have been approved to come into USI—primarily core courses or introductory courses. USI tends to be an “importer” of credits.  Growing numbers of students have at least some of their course work completed elsewhere, which is significant for completion of the Core curriculum.  Increase in the “swirl,” as students have coursework from multiple institutions, transferring from place to place or taking simultaneous courses from various universities.  CAP and early college courses further enhance/complicate the transfer picture. Over the next 5 years, USI will continue to grapple with the changing nature of transfer students and how to best serve them.
  23. 23. •NationalTrends •USI Enrollment in Distance Education Courses •USI Distance Education Offerings •USI Degrees available primarily through distance education
  24. 24.  Increased competition for online courses from for-profits and certification entities (ex.University of Phoenix)  Software costs have skyrocketed resulting in increased use of open-source alternatives for providing online courses  Increased concerns regarding validity of student work in online environments, resulting in new products and services to verify student identity.  Develop of new technologies and techniques for teaching applied courses such as chemistry labs, biology dissection, etc.
  25. 25. 293 432 731 981 1196 1538 2009 2421 2815 3101 3223 3560 3804 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 # of students taking 1 or more DE courses
  26. 26. 42 132 152 204 321 426 503 642 723 807 874 950 1009 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 # of USI students enrolled in only DE coursescourses
  27. 27. 83 133 158 183 178 188 208 298 298 246 324 367 408 338 338 338 342 335 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 # of unique DE courses offered # of DE sections offered
  28. 28.  Undergraduate Degree Programs  Health Services  Nursing  Radiologic and Imaging Sciences  Master’s Degree Programs  Health Administration  Nursing  OccupationalTherapy  SocialWork
  29. 29. •Comparison of Indiana State Schools –Tuition versus StateAppropriations •State Funding Issues •Changes in State Funding Formulas
  30. 30. $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000 $18,000 $20,000 USI Indiana State Ball State Purdue IU Tuition '08-'09 $5,078 $7,186 $7,516 $7,749 $8,280 Appropriation '08-'09 $4,982 $9,749 $7,437 $10,987 $9,252 $4,982 $9,749 $7,437 $10,987 $9,252 $5,078 $7,186 $7,516 $7,749 $8,280
  31. 31.  Significant decrease in state funding for USI 2010-2011 biennium  4.70% or 3.9 million dollars (including a 1-time reversion of $1,071,891)  No increases state operating appropriations in near future  Changes in state funding formulas from enrollment to performance based Despite decreases and changes in state funding, USI is well-positioned to weather the current economic storm
  32. 32. • Increase in Degrees Incentive • Time to Degree Incentive • Low Income Degrees • Enrollment/Successfully Completed Credit Hours • Two-YearTransfer Incentive • Economic Development: Non-Credit Instruction – TwoYear Institutions Only • Research Support Incentive – Research Inst.
  33. 33. •External Grant Submissions •External Grant Awards
  34. 34. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2006-2007 2007-2008 Number Submitted 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2006-2007 2007-2008 Percentage Funded
  35. 35. $0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000
  36. 36. •Carnegie Foundation Classification •Extended Services •College Achievement Program •Extended Services – Program Expansion •Extended Services – Key Partnerships •Engagement of Faculty, Staff & Students 2007 -2009 •Service Learning Faculty, Staff and Student Engagement •Regional Connectivity •Extended Services Program Enrollments / Contracts 2009
  37. 37.  On December 18, 2008,The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement ofTeaching announced the University of Southern Indiana was successful in its application for the Community Engagement Classification.  This achievement recognizes USI’s ongoing collaboration with the tri-state community and beyond in both curricular engagement and outreach & partnerships.  Extended Services outreach activities comprised a significant part of the application to the Carnegie Foundation
  38. 38. 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 977 1450 2000 2866 4355 6000 Enrollments Credit Hours 15 22 2630 39 42 65 90 114 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 High Schools Courses Instructors *Spring 2010 semester numbers are estimated
  39. 39.  1974 - Outreach programming beginning with the founding of the Office of Continuing Educ.  2000 – Evolved into the Division of Extended Services with 4 core programming areas: Academic programs; Continuing education; Cultural tourism; & Southern IN Japanese School  Since 2001, eight new comp0nents have been added, expanded or reorganized:  2001 - ROTC  2006 - Connect with Southern Indiana & Center forApplied Research  2007 - Center for Continuing Education, Center for Education Services & Partnerships , Center for Human Resource Development, & Service Learning  2008 – USI at Innovation Pointe
  40. 40.  Higher Education Partner @ Innovation Point  National SurfaceWarfare Center - Crane  Town of New Harmony  Indiana’s Historic Pathways  Various P-12 schools and regional school corporations  Tri-State Industrial Safety Council  Mesker Park Zoo &Wesselman Nature Center  Growth Alliance for Greater Evansville (GAGE)  WIRED  WorkOne / higher education partner for displaced Whirlpool worker retraining  And numerous other not-for-profit & for-profit organizations throughout the region
  41. 41. Historic Southern Indiana Applied Research Education Services & Partnerships Continuing Education Human Resource Development Historic New Harmony Students 22 134 283 408 0 92 Staff 3 21 9 40 2 32 Faculty 15 87 30 178 9 19 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
  42. 42. 43 68 87 870 1736 2064 3 7 28 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2007 2008 2009 Faculty Students Staff
  43. 43. Division of Extended Services Innovative Approaches Connect with Southern Indiana regional leadership development program Hi-Tech Incubator @ Innovation Pointe TechTransfer partnership with NSWC Crane and federal research labs CulturalTourism through Historic New Harmon & Historic Southern Indiana Innovation Discovery Process collaboration with NSWC Crane Support for expanding STEM outreach throughout the region Broad spectrum of programming for children from preschool through high school Support for Seeking and securing grant for outreach projects Engagement of faculty and students through applied research Funding faculty outreach research and adult learner scholarships Investing program revenue in new program development and community service Day on the Bus – a regional tour for faculty from USI and other institutions Convener of regional higher education collaboration for workforce development / displaced worker retraining efforts
  44. 44. • Noncredit Enrollments15,000+ • Companies/Organizations Served through Contracts93 • Contracts for Applied Research38 • Contracts for Human Resource Development23
  45. 45. •5YearTrends in giving •5 year private and public donations and grants •Employee DonationTrends
  46. 46.  Average annual support raised over past 5 years = $8,454,670  Private gift revenue is 6.7% of USI’s expenditures.This exceeds the national average of 5.6% for public, master’s institutions.  Individuals provided approximately 58% public and private support  Foundations and Corporations provided an average of 31% USIF support, with governmental grants providing the remaining 11%  Average fundraising cost is 18 cents per dollar raised.  The average return on investment is 531.6%.  Bequests to the University of Southern Indiana Foundation have comprised an average of 32% of gifts from individuals over the past five years. Nationally, bequests comprised 20% of gifts from individuals to higher education in 2008.
  47. 47. FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Private Gifts $7,582,162 $9,520,151 $5,406,216 $6,819,452 $3,547,416 Lilly Endowment Grants $2,676,446 $1,843,786 $0 $479,768 $0 Total for Private Support $10,258,608 $11,363,937 $5,406,216 $7,299,220 $3,547,416 Govt. Grants $570,700 $294,438 $1,029,756 $929,925 $1,573,132 Total for Public & Private Support $10,829,308 $11,658,375 $6,435,972 $8,229,145 $5,120,548
  48. 48. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 % of FT Adminstrators Donors % of FT Faculty Donors % of FT Support Staff Donors $- $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg Total Gift Per Adminstrator Avg Total Gift Per FT Faculty Avg Total Gift per Support Staff
  49. 49. •Employee Headcount •Employee Ethnicity •Employment Activity •Retirement Forecast
  50. 50. 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 % Increase Support staff 337 335 349 359 357 6% Administrative 226 240 252 262 266 18% Faculty 314 315 330 346 352 12% Full-Time Benefit Eligible Employees 877 890 931 967 975 11% Retirees 113 119 129 147 155 37% Headcount figures as of 12/31 of respective year at R:HRBudgetBudget work 2009- 10HRStatsAltStudthru2008.xlsx
  51. 51. Faculty Administrative Support Staff Nonresident alien 26 5 2 Black, non-Hispanic 4 7 11 American Indian/Alaska Native 1 0 0 Asian/Pacific Islander 10 4 0 Hispanic 3 2 3 White, non-Hispanic 277 247 348 Race and ethnicity unknown 2 1 2 Ethnicity figures as of 11/1/08 from 2008 IPEDS
  52. 52. 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Support staff openings 75 95 97 64 53 Administrative openings 36 45 52 33 29 Total Non-Faculty Openings 111 140 149 97 82 Faculty openings 74 90 81 77 44 Total Openings 185 230 230 174 126 Faculty Promotions 14 10 12 10 11 Internal Promotions and Reclassifications (non-faculty) 20 28 39 Internal Transfers (non-faculty) 15 5 3
  53. 53. Age Faculty Admin Support Total 60 - 64 30 20 31 81 65+ 20 5 6 31 Total 50 25 37 112 Total Employees 332 283 359 974 % 60+ yrs 15% 9% 10% 11% Age Academic Affairs Business Affairs Student Affairs Univ. / Gov't Rel Dev/ President 60-64 38 25 10 5 2 65+ 28 5 0 0 0 Total 66 30 10 5 2 Total Employees 534 268 98 33 41 % 60+yrs 12% 11% 10% 15% 5%
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×