Name: REINALYNE F. IGNACIO & ANGELYN ALACBAY<br />Subject: DEVELOPMENTAL READING <br />Topic: COMPREHENSION AND LEVELS OF ...
comprehension and levels of comprehension
comprehension and levels of comprehension
comprehension and levels of comprehension
comprehension and levels of comprehension
comprehension and levels of comprehension
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

comprehension and levels of comprehension

45,975

Published on

Published in: Education
3 Comments
10 Likes
Statistics
Notes
No Downloads
Views
Total Views
45,975
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
611
Comments
3
Likes
10
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "comprehension and levels of comprehension"

  1. 1. Name: REINALYNE F. IGNACIO & ANGELYN ALACBAY<br />Subject: DEVELOPMENTAL READING <br />Topic: COMPREHENSION AND LEVELS OF COMPREHENSION<br />What is Comprehension?<br />Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary offers this definition of comprehension: “capacity of the mind to perceive and understand.” Reading comprehension, then, would be the competence to perceive and understand the meanings communicated by texts.<br />According to Webster’s Dictionary, comprehension is “the capacity for understanding fully; the act or action of grasping with the intellect.” Webster also tells us that reading is “to receive or take in sense of (as letter or symbols) by scanning; to understand the meaning of written or printed matter; to learn from what one has seen or found in writing or in print.”<br />The ability to understand or get meaning from text (any type of written material). It is the reason for reading and a critical component of all content learning.<br />It is the think done before, during, and after reading.<br />Comprehension is not something that happens after reading (Fountas, 2000).<br />It is the interaction between the text being read and the reader’s existing prior knowledge and expectations will generate meaning and comprehension (Leu and kinzer, 1995).<br />If readers can read the words but do not understand what they are reading, they are not really reading.<br />Indicators of Learners’ Reading Comprehension<br />Construction of meaning from textActivation of background knowledge before, during and after reading textMonitoring of learners own understanding of textIdentification of what they do not understandAbility to use appropriate strategies to synthesize what they readCreation of visual and other sensory imagery from text during and after readingIdentification and interpretation of vocabulary critical to the meaning of the textGenerating questions to generate information from textRetelling text orally and/or in written formSummarizing text orally and/written formUsing graphic aids and illustrationsExamining and extending the meaning of the textResponding to text in oral discussion and written formMaking inferences from textAbility to compare complex concepts of textAnalysis of the text structure and story elements<br />Comprehension Levels<br />The levels of comprehension, or complexity of thinking, are presented in the following hierarchy from the least to the most sophisticated level of reading.<br />LEVELDescriptionQuestion AskedLevel OneLITERALThis level is knowing what is actually stated which includes facts and details, rote learning and memorization.This level involves surface understanding only.At the literal level of comprehension, readers are at the most basic of levels. Readers are building their knowledge but they do not necessarily have command of it.When they first approach brand new information, readers are at the literal level of comprehension.Common questions used to illicit this type of thinking are who, what, when, and where questions. These are the easiest to answer because the answer is expressed directly.Level TwoINTERPRETATIVEThe reader gleans what is implied or meant, rather than what is actually stated.This level involves drawing inferences or reading between the lines.Readers tap into prior knowledge/experience and attach new learning to old information.Readers make logical leaps and educated guesses.Readers read between the lines to determine what is meant by what is stated.At this level, readers are attempting to understand what the author meant by what he/she said in the story, paragraph or textbook. It is presumed that they have already memorized certain facts at the literal level and now they are attempting to see the implications of the author’s words.At this level, readers are attempting to understand that which they memorized at the literal level of comprehension.The types of questions asked are open-ended, thought-provoking questions like why, what if, and how. The answers to these questions are not directly stated. One is asked to analyze and think about what he has read and to use his background knowledge about the subject to answer the question.Level ThreeAPPLIEDThis involves taking what was said(literal) and then what was meant by what was said (interpretive) and then extend (apply) the concepts or ideas beyond the situation.Readers analyze or synthesize information and apply it to other information.At this level the reader or studentCan attempt to answer this question: How would the author’s message apply to other situations given what you memorized and understood at the other two levels?Readers are attempting to elevate or raise their thinking one more “notch” or level to a more critical, analyzing level. This presumes that they have already reached the previous two levels. They are “reading between the lines” and then examining the message from the author and attempting to apply that message to other situations.Common questions may include In what ways…If these are…If you were…These questions ask one to go beyond literal and interpretive reading by applying the information one has just read to another similar or familiar situation.<br />Skills that are Important for Comprehension<br />Understand the wordsComprehend what the wordsFind facts and detailsSeek one or more pieces of information in the textFind main ideasFrom the whole content, prioritize the overriding (primary) theme or ideaFigure out the sequenceTell the order or eventsFind cause-effectSee how one person, action, or event triggers another; also, identify the “who” or “what” that occursMake inferencesDevelop ideas or images based on what is read in the text but do not statedGeneralizeDiscern the relationship between single events and the larger situation or other eventsIdentify tone/moodSense how the author was feeling and how he wanted the reader to feel while readingIdentify “theme”See the “big picture” moral or abstract ideaIdentify characterizationComprehend what makes characters act as they doDistinguish fact from fictionSort out what is real and what is part of the imaginary world created by the authorFind bias or propagandaNotice obvious or hidden bias<br />Cognitive Factors that Affect Reading Comprehension<br />Reader interest/Motivation for Reading Waxier (2004) claims that “we cannot downplay the role that student interest and motivation play in constructing meaning.” Readers read for several reasons, e.g. for pleasure, knowledge generation and many other reasons. However, we must consider the materials that are appealing and interesting to them. In reading, there are two general motivation orientations. These are: Intrinsic – engagement in a reading activity by choice and for its own sake; deep involvement that fulfills a desire to learn or know. Extrinsic – engagement in a reading activity for the purpose of receiving some external, usually surface level reward or recognition, such as praise or positive evaluation, or avoidance of punishment; desire to complete the reading task rather than understand itSchema This is distinctly personal store of knowledge gained through a lifetime of experiences. This stored knowledge along with its storage structure is called schemata. This term is often used in its singular form - schema – that refers to an organized lump of knowledge or experience, often coupled with feelings or emotions associated with experience at the time the information was stored. When readers have little or no schema for a subject, comprehension is greatly impeded. Schema is often compared to the filing system our brain uses catalog information the files on a computer and the storage system by which those files are organized in the computer’s memory. This theoretical construct of cognitive structure again argues for reading as a meaning making activity that is unique to the individual. Comprehension does not proceed independently of a reader’s fund of related experiences and background knowledge or schemata. Schema theory was developed by R. C. Anderson, a respected educational psychologist. This learning theory views organized knowledge as an elaborate network of abstract mental structures which represent one’s understanding of the world. SIL international (1999) maintains that analyzing the Schema Theory leads us to realize that:It is important to teach general knowledge and generic concepts. A large proportion of learner difficulties can be traced to insufficient general knowledge, especially in cross-cultural situations.Teachers must help learners build schemata and make connections between ideas. Discussion, songs, role play, illustrations, visual aids, and explanations of how a piece of knowledge applies are some of the techniques used to strengthen connections.Since prior knowledge is essential for the comprehension of new information, teachers either need to:Help students build the prerequisite knowledge; or Remind them of what they already know before introducing new material.Schemata grow and change as new information is acquired.Learners feel internal conflict if they are trying to assimilate schemata which contradict their previous suppositions. Teachers need to understand and be sympathetic to this tension.Deep-seated schemata are hard to change. An individual will often prefer to live with inconsistencies rather that to change a deeply-held value or belief.Metacognition Another important concept related to the development of fluent reading is that of metacognition or metacognitive awareness. Simply stated metacognition is knowing about knowing, thinking about thinking. Metacognition is knowing “what we know” and “what we don’t know.” The basic metacognitive strategies are:Connecting new information to former knowledge.Selecting thinking strategies deliberately.Planning, monitoring, and evaluating thinking processes. A thinking person is in charge of his behavior. When he employs metacognition, he does the following:Determines when it is necessary to use metacognitive strategies;Selects strategies to define a problem situation and researches alternative solutions;Tailors this search for information to constraints of time and energy; monitors, controls and judges her thinking;Evaluates and decides when a problem is solved to a satisfactory degree or when the demands of daily living take a temporary or permanent higher priority; Metacognitive reflection questions could include: What was expected to do? What part of this process/assignment were difficult, and why? If I were to do this over again, what would I do differently? What are some connections between learning this and other subjects? How does what I have learned relate to other things I do? What are some examples of what I did well/ how has this problem helped me become a better problem-solver? Which vocabulary and comprehension strategies best work for me?<br />

×