SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 23
But it wasn’t just me!
Causation
So, you’ve done an act (or failed to
act)…
But V does something to make the
harm worse…
Or a third party does something to
make the harm worse…
Or the medical staff make a
mistake which makes the harm
worse…
Are you still liable?
What is Causation?
As well as establishing that D has done (or failed to do!)
something, and meant to do it, we also have to prove
that the act actually lead to the harm to V.
This is called the chain of causation.
D’s actions
V’s harm
Imagine this….
You cause a paper cut to Miss Hart. Twenty
minutes later Bob stabs Miss Hart and she dies of
blood loss.
Are you responsible for her death?
You stab Miss Hart once with a knife. Twenty
minutes later Bob stabs Miss Hart once as well
and she dies of blood loss.
Are you responsible for her death?
A conundrum…
Louis pushes Dave off the Empire
State Building. Unknown to him,
Reginald is firing his gun out of the
window of a room on the 43rd floor.
As Dave falls past Reginald’s
window, one of the bullets hits him,
killing him instantly. Dave hits the
floor.
Who is legally
responsible for his
death?
General rules:
This is the last legal step that is taken to establish D’s legal
responsibility for the result (normally a death)
Legal CausationFactual Causation
White 1910 Thabo Meli
‘but for’ More than Minimal
Substantive
Operative
Got the basic
principles?
James has been stabbed forty
times. Sam comes along and
pricks the end of his finger with
a drawing pin. James dies Some of you might even be
able to:
Discuss how the legal principles
might affect the outcome with the
following variations to the facts:
What if James had been
stabbed by forty people, each
inflicting one wound? How
would causation affect their
liability?
What if the car that hit Gladys
was speeding down a one way
street the wrong way?
Use your understanding to decide whether
Sam and Nigel are liable for the deaths in the
scenarios below:
Nigel pulls a knife on Bob who
runs down the pavement and hits
Gladys. Gladys falls into the
road and is hit by a car and dies
E Grade
Make a decision!
C Grade
Apply each test to the
scenario to explain
how he meets it.
A Grade
Use a supporting case,
which you explain and
link to the scenario
Breaking the chain
Key Vocabulary:
Novus actus interveniens
(new intervening act)
The courts have established a
number of situations which
may break the chain of
causation, but please be aware
that in reality it is very, very
hard to break it!
After all, D has normally done
something bad, even if
someone else made the harm
worse.
These are known as new
intervening acts.
Possible Break One:
Unreasonable Actions of V
Roberts 1971
Majoram 2000
Williams & Davis 1992
Scenario:
V tries to escape D and is injured
in the attempt....
Is D liable for the harm?
Possible Break Two:
Unreasonable Actions of Third Party
Scenario:
D causes V some harm, but someone else also does something to harm V.
Is D liable for the harm caused by the third party, even if they make it worse?
R v Pagett 1983 R v Rafferty 2007
“the free deliberate and
informed intervention of
a second person who
intends to exploit the
situation created by the
first, but is not acting on
concert with him, is
normally held to relieve
the first actor of criminal
responsibility”.
Some further considerations:
‘Palpably Wrong’ Medical Treatment
R v Jordan 1956
R v Smith 1959
D actions were still
“operative and substantive”
Only break if so
independent of original
wound to be a new chain of
causation.
AO2: Do you think that the
outcome of this case was
just and fair to D?
The doctors actions did
break the chain.
Important Material Facts:
How bad can it be, and still
maintain the chain?
…so when might it actually
break the chain?
Cheshire 1991
Possible Break One:
‘Palpably Wrong’ Medical Treatment
D causes V some harm, but medical treatment makes the harm worse, or even kills them!
Is D liable for the harm?
1. Did Cheshire succeed in his appeal?
2. Outline the main facts of the case, in no more than
two bullet points!
3. Why was D appealing his conviction?
4. Were the gunshot wounds considered the substantial
and operative cause of death by the court?
5. Why do you think that the courts prefer to blame
Cheshire instead of the doctors?
6. When might the actions of the Doctors break the
chain of causation?
7. Who do you think caused the death of the victim?
Why? Reason your answer using the tests!
Challenge:
The Times chose the
headline “no such thing
as murder by halves”.
How true is that as a statement of the
law?
D had lost his daughter and blamed
his mother for having killed her. His
mother did not deny her
responsibility and promised to
commit suicide. Eight days later she
still had not done it.
The man then came into her hut
with a stick and some rope. He tied
the rope to a rafter, made a noose
at the other end, and urged his
mother to "Get up and hang
yourself." The woman asked for
something to stand on.
The man put a block of wood under
the rope. He then left the hut and
watched his mother get up on the
block of wood, put the noose around
her neck, and kick the block away.
Did the man cause the death of
his mother?
Consolidation
In your hand outs, answer the question, using at least
two cases to support your conclusions.
Louis pushes Dave off the Empire
State Building. Unknown to him,
Reginald is firing his gun out of the
window of a room on the 43rd floor.
As Dave falls past Reginald’s
window, one of the bullets hits him,
killing him instantly. Dave hits the
floor.
Who is legally responsible for
his death?
Reason, using at least one case in your discussion!
Plenary:
So can you answer the problem?
Starter:
Which is the odd one out in each set of pictures?
Some other things which might break it...
R v Malcherek &
Steel 1981
Life Support Machines D’s beliefs, state of mind or
inherent weakness.
R v Blaue 1975
Holland 1841Dear 1996
Consolidation:
Have you got the essentials?
Student Task:
All of you will produce your own chain of causation diagram in your work
books, identifying the issues which may affect D’s liability.
Most of you will be able to support the identification of an issue’ with
reference to a key case illustrating the test or area affected.
Some of you will be able to identify a contrasting case to illustrate the limits of
the issues affecting the chain of causation.
Applying the Law:
Are the following defendants still liable?
Problem Causation Potential Break(s) Because…(link to
cases)
Overall Liability.
Bob rejects Vicky’s
advances, so she
stabs him. He is
taken to hospital
where it is
discovered he has a
rare blood type and
the hospital does
not have enough
supplies of his
blood. He dies.
In the exam you will have a long problem question. If someone dies, it may be that you will be
asked to comment on causation issues that arise. This means that you need to know the cases,
tests and be able to apply and discuss what that means for D. To start you off, we will only look at
the causation issues affecting the following DD.
Look at your homework problems for guidance on how to answer these.
Now you have a go!
Gary decides to rob a bank. He takes his girlfriend with him as a getaway driver. The
robbery goes wrong and armed police arrive. He tries to escape and uses his girlfriend
as shield. The police start firing and his girlfriend dies.
Dave is fed up of his wife. He decides to kill her and puts an overdose of arsenic in her
morning tea. She takes a couple of sips and passes out. Thinking she is dead, Dave
drags her out of the house, whacking her head on the pavement. He dumps her in the
skip at the bottom of the street. She is found and taken to hospital, where it is
discovered that she has extensive brain damage, and the doctors declare her dead,
turning off the life support machine.
Section C Exam Question
Section C Guidance
Answer one out of a
choice of two questions
20 marks… 20 minutes
ALL AO2 application
marks (no cases!)
 5 Bullet points.
Start with definition
Conclude on statement’s
accuracy with a reason
Treat each statement
separately
Damian and Juan are arguing and Damian pulls out a knife. Juan runs into the
road and knocks over a cyclist, Brenda. Juan suffers bruising and a small cut from
the collision. Brenda falls under the wheels of Manuel’s car and suffers head
injuries. Brenda has an unusually thin skill and dies.
Juan is scared to run into Damian again, and refuses to go to the doctor to get his
injuries checked. After a couple of weeks, his cut has become infected and he
develops gangrene. Finally, he goes to hospital where Dr Smith advises him to
have the finger amputated. Damian agrees, but Dr Smith cuts off the wrong
finger, and the gangrene spreads, killing Juan.
Evaluate the accuracy of each of the four statements A, B, C, and D individually,
as they apply to the facts in the above scenario.
Statement A: Damian is not liable for the bruising suffered by Juan because he
did not hurt Juan in the first place.
Statement B: Damian is not liable for the death of Brenda because she has an
unusually thin skill.
Statement C: Damian is not responsible for Juan’s death as it was Dr Smith’s
error which caused the death.
Statement D: Damian is not responsible for Juan’s death Juan chose not to get
treatment.
Example Answer:
Damian and Juan are arguing and Damian pulls out a knife. Juan runs into the road and knocks over a cyclist, Brenda.
Juan suffers bruising and a small cut from the collision. Brenda falls under the wheels of Manuel’s car and suffers head
injuries. Brenda has an unusually thin skill and dies.
Juan is scared to run into Damian again, and refuses to go to the doctor to get his injuries checked. After a couple of
weeks, his cut has become infected and he develops gangrene. Finally, he goes to hospital where Dr Smith advises him
to have the finger amputated. Damian agrees, but Dr Smith cuts off the wrong finger, and the gangrene spreads,
killing Juan.
Evaluate the accuracy of each of the four statements A, B, C, and D individually, as they apply to the facts in the
above scenario.
Statement A: Damian is not liable for the bruising suffered by Juan because he did not hurt Juan in the first place.
• In order to be liable, Damian must have legally and factually caused the harm to Juan, without
any unforeseeable interventions occurring.
• Damian’s harm does not have to be the only cause, but it must be a more than minimal cause,
which it is as it caused Juan to run away and be hit, and thus need to go to hospital.
• If he hadn’t have taken out the knife, then Juan would not have needed to go to hospital, and
so he also passes the legal test as his acts are a more than minimal cause of the harm.
• As Damian is both legally and factually responsible, the only thing that could relieve him of
liability would be Juan’s acts in running away. However these aren’t so daft as to be
unforeseeable as it is reasonable for someone to run from a knife, so the chain is not broken.
• Therefore the statement is not accurate as Damian is both legally and factually liable for the
bruising.
Now for our class turn.
Damian and Juan are arguing and Damian pulls out a knife. Juan runs into the road and knocks over a cyclist,
Brenda. Juan suffers bruising and a small cut from the collision. Brenda falls under the wheels of Manuel’s car and
suffers head injuries. Brenda has an unusually thin skill and dies.
Juan is scared to run into Damian again, and refuses to go to the doctor to get his injuries checked. After a couple of
weeks, his cut has become infected and he develops gangrene. Finally, he goes to hospital where Dr Smith advises
him to have the finger amputated. Damian agrees, but Dr Smith cuts off the wrong finger, and the gangrene
spreads, killing Juan.
Evaluate the accuracy of each of the four statements A, B, C, and D individually, as they apply to the facts in the
above scenario.
Statement B: Damian is not liable for the death of Brenda because she has an unusually thin skill.
… and finally, your turn.
Damian and Juan are arguing and Damian pulls out a knife. Juan runs into the road and knocks over a cyclist,
Brenda. Juan suffers bruising and a small cut from the collision. Brenda falls under the wheels of Manuel’s car and
suffers head injuries. Brenda has an unusually thin skill and dies.
Juan is scared to run into Damian again, and refuses to go to the doctor to get his injuries checked. After a couple of
weeks, his cut has become infected and he develops gangrene. Finally, he goes to hospital where Dr Smith advises
him to have the finger amputated. Damian agrees, but Dr Smith cuts off the wrong finger, and the gangrene
spreads, killing Juan.
Evaluate the accuracy of each of the four statements A, B, C, and D individually, as they apply to the facts in the
above scenario.
Statement C: Damian is not responsible for Juan’s death as it was Dr Smith’s error which caused the death.
Statement D: Damian is not responsible for Juan’s death Juan chose not to get treatment.
Complete the answer for statements A and B, to demonstrate your
skills.
Terminology:
Canyouidentifytheterm
fromthedefinition?
Where X does an act so daft, that D is no longer
responsible for the outcome.
Where D takes their victim as they find them, with
their underlying physical weaknesses, beliefs or
decisions.
Something which may break the chain of
causation and relieve D of their liability.
Where the treatment is so wrong that it constitutes
a new chain of causation.
D’s harm to V must still be functioning and
significant enough when V dies for D to be liable.
Got the essentials?:
Can you name the case…
1. Her heart wasn’t up to the
drink.
2. I was only trying to touch her
lovely coat. She didn’t need to
jump!
3. She’s definitely not a shield –
despite the size of her stomach.
4. I don’t care what you believe...
as Jehovah is my witness.
5. Oh! So that’s the one you’re
allergic to. Are you sure?
6. Fish and chips can be dangerous
7. Who knew soldiers could be
that clumsy?

More Related Content

What's hot

Justification In Tort
Justification In TortJustification In Tort
Justification In Tortjayvant1
 
Vicarious liability
Vicarious liabilityVicarious liability
Vicarious liabilityJustin Tay
 
Justification of Torts & General Defences
Justification of Torts & General DefencesJustification of Torts & General Defences
Justification of Torts & General Defencesairlawacademy
 
Tort strict absolute liability
Tort  strict absolute liabilityTort  strict absolute liability
Tort strict absolute liabilityDr. Vikas Khakare
 
Malicious prosecution
Malicious prosecutionMalicious prosecution
Malicious prosecutionGovindGoyal13
 
Law of torts notes
Law of torts notesLaw of torts notes
Law of torts notesVidya Adsule
 
Remoteness of Damage
Remoteness of DamageRemoteness of Damage
Remoteness of DamageHCRao
 
Law of torts Introduction
Law of torts IntroductionLaw of torts Introduction
Law of torts IntroductionDr. Arun Verma
 
Ubi jus ibi remedium
Ubi jus ibi remediumUbi jus ibi remedium
Ubi jus ibi remediumRahul Gaur
 
Relevancy of evidence under Section 7 of Evidence Act 1950
Relevancy of evidence under Section 7 of Evidence Act 1950Relevancy of evidence under Section 7 of Evidence Act 1950
Relevancy of evidence under Section 7 of Evidence Act 1950Intan Muhammad
 
Tort Law: Public Policy And Psychiatric Injury
Tort Law: Public Policy And Psychiatric InjuryTort Law: Public Policy And Psychiatric Injury
Tort Law: Public Policy And Psychiatric InjuryKirsty Allison
 
Strict & Absolute Liability
Strict & Absolute LiabilityStrict & Absolute Liability
Strict & Absolute LiabilityLaw Laboratory
 

What's hot (20)

An introduction to law of torts
An introduction to law of tortsAn introduction to law of torts
An introduction to law of torts
 
Justification In Tort
Justification In TortJustification In Tort
Justification In Tort
 
Tort trespass
Tort trespassTort trespass
Tort trespass
 
Vicarious liability
Vicarious liabilityVicarious liability
Vicarious liability
 
Justification of Torts & General Defences
Justification of Torts & General DefencesJustification of Torts & General Defences
Justification of Torts & General Defences
 
Tort nuisance
Tort nuisanceTort nuisance
Tort nuisance
 
Tort strict absolute liability
Tort  strict absolute liabilityTort  strict absolute liability
Tort strict absolute liability
 
LAW OF TORTS
LAW OF TORTSLAW OF TORTS
LAW OF TORTS
 
Malicious prosecution
Malicious prosecutionMalicious prosecution
Malicious prosecution
 
Law of torts notes
Law of torts notesLaw of torts notes
Law of torts notes
 
Remoteness of Damage
Remoteness of DamageRemoteness of Damage
Remoteness of Damage
 
Law of torts Introduction
Law of torts IntroductionLaw of torts Introduction
Law of torts Introduction
 
Tort remedies
Tort remediesTort remedies
Tort remedies
 
Ubi jus ibi remedium
Ubi jus ibi remediumUbi jus ibi remedium
Ubi jus ibi remedium
 
Negligence
NegligenceNegligence
Negligence
 
Relevancy of evidence under Section 7 of Evidence Act 1950
Relevancy of evidence under Section 7 of Evidence Act 1950Relevancy of evidence under Section 7 of Evidence Act 1950
Relevancy of evidence under Section 7 of Evidence Act 1950
 
Assault
AssaultAssault
Assault
 
TYPES OF TORT. TORT AND DAMAGES
TYPES OF TORT. TORT AND DAMAGESTYPES OF TORT. TORT AND DAMAGES
TYPES OF TORT. TORT AND DAMAGES
 
Tort Law: Public Policy And Psychiatric Injury
Tort Law: Public Policy And Psychiatric InjuryTort Law: Public Policy And Psychiatric Injury
Tort Law: Public Policy And Psychiatric Injury
 
Strict & Absolute Liability
Strict & Absolute LiabilityStrict & Absolute Liability
Strict & Absolute Liability
 

Viewers also liked

Diminished Responsibility
Diminished ResponsibilityDiminished Responsibility
Diminished ResponsibilityMiss Hart
 
Loss of Control
Loss of ControlLoss of Control
Loss of ControlMiss Hart
 
Duress & Necessity
Duress & NecessityDuress & Necessity
Duress & NecessityMiss Hart
 
Loss Of Control Intro Lesson
Loss Of Control Intro LessonLoss Of Control Intro Lesson
Loss Of Control Intro LessonMiss Hart
 
Murder 2012 13
Murder 2012 13Murder 2012 13
Murder 2012 13Miss Hart
 
Involuntary Manslaughter
Involuntary ManslaughterInvoluntary Manslaughter
Involuntary ManslaughterMiss Hart
 
Causation End of Unit Assessment
Causation End of Unit AssessmentCausation End of Unit Assessment
Causation End of Unit AssessmentMiss Hart
 
Insanity & Automatism
Insanity & AutomatismInsanity & Automatism
Insanity & AutomatismMiss Hart
 

Viewers also liked (11)

Diminished Responsibility
Diminished ResponsibilityDiminished Responsibility
Diminished Responsibility
 
Loss of Control
Loss of ControlLoss of Control
Loss of Control
 
Duress & Necessity
Duress & NecessityDuress & Necessity
Duress & Necessity
 
Actus Reus
Actus ReusActus Reus
Actus Reus
 
Mens Rea
Mens ReaMens Rea
Mens Rea
 
Loss Of Control Intro Lesson
Loss Of Control Intro LessonLoss Of Control Intro Lesson
Loss Of Control Intro Lesson
 
Murder 2012 13
Murder 2012 13Murder 2012 13
Murder 2012 13
 
Involuntary Manslaughter
Involuntary ManslaughterInvoluntary Manslaughter
Involuntary Manslaughter
 
Attempts
AttemptsAttempts
Attempts
 
Causation End of Unit Assessment
Causation End of Unit AssessmentCausation End of Unit Assessment
Causation End of Unit Assessment
 
Insanity & Automatism
Insanity & AutomatismInsanity & Automatism
Insanity & Automatism
 

Similar to Causation

Causation 2013 14
Causation 2013 14Causation 2013 14
Causation 2013 14Miss Hart
 
AR Causation 2012-13
AR Causation 2012-13AR Causation 2012-13
AR Causation 2012-13Miss Hart
 
Causation & other issues 2011 12
Causation & other issues 2011 12Causation & other issues 2011 12
Causation & other issues 2011 12Miss Hart
 
Ar ppt 2013 14
Ar ppt 2013 14Ar ppt 2013 14
Ar ppt 2013 14Miss Hart
 
End of unit assessment 2012
End of unit assessment 2012End of unit assessment 2012
End of unit assessment 2012Miss Hart
 
Invol mtr 2013 142
Invol mtr 2013 142Invol mtr 2013 142
Invol mtr 2013 142Miss Hart
 
Ar ppt 2012 13
Ar ppt 2012 13Ar ppt 2012 13
Ar ppt 2012 13Miss Hart
 
Y13 Summer Recap
Y13 Summer RecapY13 Summer Recap
Y13 Summer RecapMiss Hart
 
Invol powerpoint 2012-13
Invol powerpoint 2012-13Invol powerpoint 2012-13
Invol powerpoint 2012-13Miss Hart
 
Year 13 Mock Jan 2013
Year 13 Mock Jan 2013Year 13 Mock Jan 2013
Year 13 Mock Jan 2013Miss Hart
 
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared ResourceLaw-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resourcelawexchange.co.uk
 
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared ResourceLaw-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resourcelawexchange.co.uk
 
Causation problem lesson
Causation problem lesson Causation problem lesson
Causation problem lesson Miss Hart
 

Similar to Causation (20)

Causation 2013 14
Causation 2013 14Causation 2013 14
Causation 2013 14
 
AR Causation 2012-13
AR Causation 2012-13AR Causation 2012-13
AR Causation 2012-13
 
Causation & other issues 2011 12
Causation & other issues 2011 12Causation & other issues 2011 12
Causation & other issues 2011 12
 
Ar ppt 2013 14
Ar ppt 2013 14Ar ppt 2013 14
Ar ppt 2013 14
 
End of unit assessment 2012
End of unit assessment 2012End of unit assessment 2012
End of unit assessment 2012
 
Invol mtr 2013 142
Invol mtr 2013 142Invol mtr 2013 142
Invol mtr 2013 142
 
Ar ppt 2012 13
Ar ppt 2012 13Ar ppt 2012 13
Ar ppt 2012 13
 
Y13 Summer Recap
Y13 Summer RecapY13 Summer Recap
Y13 Summer Recap
 
Intox2014
Intox2014Intox2014
Intox2014
 
Nfoap2014
Nfoap2014Nfoap2014
Nfoap2014
 
Mr 2013 14
Mr 2013 14Mr 2013 14
Mr 2013 14
 
Invol powerpoint 2012-13
Invol powerpoint 2012-13Invol powerpoint 2012-13
Invol powerpoint 2012-13
 
Year 13 Mock Jan 2013
Year 13 Mock Jan 2013Year 13 Mock Jan 2013
Year 13 Mock Jan 2013
 
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared ResourceLaw-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
 
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared ResourceLaw-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
 
Dr 2013
Dr 2013Dr 2013
Dr 2013
 
Causation problem lesson
Causation problem lesson Causation problem lesson
Causation problem lesson
 
Mr 2011 12
Mr 2011 12Mr 2011 12
Mr 2011 12
 
Duress 2012
Duress 2012Duress 2012
Duress 2012
 
Dr 2012
Dr 2012Dr 2012
Dr 2012
 

More from Miss Hart

Catcher [AQA B Lang Lit Cwk Notes]
Catcher [AQA B Lang Lit Cwk Notes]Catcher [AQA B Lang Lit Cwk Notes]
Catcher [AQA B Lang Lit Cwk Notes]Miss Hart
 
IGCSE (San Bushmen Qu3 iGCSE)
IGCSE (San Bushmen Qu3 iGCSE)IGCSE (San Bushmen Qu3 iGCSE)
IGCSE (San Bushmen Qu3 iGCSE)Miss Hart
 
Igcse reading paper
Igcse reading paperIgcse reading paper
Igcse reading paperMiss Hart
 
L4 (qu1 empathetic interview) iGCSE summer 2014
L4 (qu1 empathetic interview) iGCSE summer 2014L4 (qu1 empathetic interview) iGCSE summer 2014
L4 (qu1 empathetic interview) iGCSE summer 2014Miss Hart
 
L3 (qu3 summary)
L3 (qu3 summary)L3 (qu3 summary)
L3 (qu3 summary)Miss Hart
 
L1 (intro to paper & qu2)
L1 (intro to paper & qu2)L1 (intro to paper & qu2)
L1 (intro to paper & qu2)Miss Hart
 
iGCSE Quiz on the Skills for Paper 2
iGCSE Quiz on the Skills for Paper 2iGCSE Quiz on the Skills for Paper 2
iGCSE Quiz on the Skills for Paper 2Miss Hart
 
iGCSE Jan Mock Prep Lesson [Question 2 Extended]
iGCSE Jan Mock Prep Lesson [Question 2 Extended]iGCSE Jan Mock Prep Lesson [Question 2 Extended]
iGCSE Jan Mock Prep Lesson [Question 2 Extended]Miss Hart
 
iGCSE Extended "Create your own Paper"
iGCSE Extended "Create your own Paper"iGCSE Extended "Create your own Paper"
iGCSE Extended "Create your own Paper"Miss Hart
 
Mechanics of Precedent EoU 2014
Mechanics of Precedent EoU 2014Mechanics of Precedent EoU 2014
Mechanics of Precedent EoU 2014Miss Hart
 
Aims and Factors of Sentencing
Aims and Factors of SentencingAims and Factors of Sentencing
Aims and Factors of SentencingMiss Hart
 
Bail and PreTrial
Bail and PreTrialBail and PreTrial
Bail and PreTrialMiss Hart
 
Powers of Arrest
Powers of ArrestPowers of Arrest
Powers of ArrestMiss Hart
 
Stop and Search
Stop and SearchStop and Search
Stop and SearchMiss Hart
 
AS Law (Precedent Lesson 1)
AS Law (Precedent Lesson 1) AS Law (Precedent Lesson 1)
AS Law (Precedent Lesson 1) Miss Hart
 
Mechanics of Precedent
Mechanics of Precedent Mechanics of Precedent
Mechanics of Precedent Miss Hart
 
Precedent (Court of Appeal & Supreme Court)
Precedent (Court of Appeal & Supreme Court)Precedent (Court of Appeal & Supreme Court)
Precedent (Court of Appeal & Supreme Court)Miss Hart
 
Adult Sentencing
Adult Sentencing Adult Sentencing
Adult Sentencing Miss Hart
 
Youth Sentencing
Youth SentencingYouth Sentencing
Youth SentencingMiss Hart
 

More from Miss Hart (20)

Catcher [AQA B Lang Lit Cwk Notes]
Catcher [AQA B Lang Lit Cwk Notes]Catcher [AQA B Lang Lit Cwk Notes]
Catcher [AQA B Lang Lit Cwk Notes]
 
IGCSE (San Bushmen Qu3 iGCSE)
IGCSE (San Bushmen Qu3 iGCSE)IGCSE (San Bushmen Qu3 iGCSE)
IGCSE (San Bushmen Qu3 iGCSE)
 
Igcse reading paper
Igcse reading paperIgcse reading paper
Igcse reading paper
 
L4 (qu1 empathetic interview) iGCSE summer 2014
L4 (qu1 empathetic interview) iGCSE summer 2014L4 (qu1 empathetic interview) iGCSE summer 2014
L4 (qu1 empathetic interview) iGCSE summer 2014
 
L3 (qu3 summary)
L3 (qu3 summary)L3 (qu3 summary)
L3 (qu3 summary)
 
L1 (intro to paper & qu2)
L1 (intro to paper & qu2)L1 (intro to paper & qu2)
L1 (intro to paper & qu2)
 
iGCSE Quiz on the Skills for Paper 2
iGCSE Quiz on the Skills for Paper 2iGCSE Quiz on the Skills for Paper 2
iGCSE Quiz on the Skills for Paper 2
 
iGCSE Jan Mock Prep Lesson [Question 2 Extended]
iGCSE Jan Mock Prep Lesson [Question 2 Extended]iGCSE Jan Mock Prep Lesson [Question 2 Extended]
iGCSE Jan Mock Prep Lesson [Question 2 Extended]
 
iGCSE Extended "Create your own Paper"
iGCSE Extended "Create your own Paper"iGCSE Extended "Create your own Paper"
iGCSE Extended "Create your own Paper"
 
Mechanics of Precedent EoU 2014
Mechanics of Precedent EoU 2014Mechanics of Precedent EoU 2014
Mechanics of Precedent EoU 2014
 
Detention
DetentionDetention
Detention
 
Aims and Factors of Sentencing
Aims and Factors of SentencingAims and Factors of Sentencing
Aims and Factors of Sentencing
 
Bail and PreTrial
Bail and PreTrialBail and PreTrial
Bail and PreTrial
 
Powers of Arrest
Powers of ArrestPowers of Arrest
Powers of Arrest
 
Stop and Search
Stop and SearchStop and Search
Stop and Search
 
AS Law (Precedent Lesson 1)
AS Law (Precedent Lesson 1) AS Law (Precedent Lesson 1)
AS Law (Precedent Lesson 1)
 
Mechanics of Precedent
Mechanics of Precedent Mechanics of Precedent
Mechanics of Precedent
 
Precedent (Court of Appeal & Supreme Court)
Precedent (Court of Appeal & Supreme Court)Precedent (Court of Appeal & Supreme Court)
Precedent (Court of Appeal & Supreme Court)
 
Adult Sentencing
Adult Sentencing Adult Sentencing
Adult Sentencing
 
Youth Sentencing
Youth SentencingYouth Sentencing
Youth Sentencing
 

Recently uploaded

Material Remains as Source of Ancient Indian History & Culture.ppt
Material Remains as Source of Ancient Indian History & Culture.pptMaterial Remains as Source of Ancient Indian History & Culture.ppt
Material Remains as Source of Ancient Indian History & Culture.pptBanaras Hindu University
 
3.12.24 The Social Construction of Gender.pptx
3.12.24 The Social Construction of Gender.pptx3.12.24 The Social Construction of Gender.pptx
3.12.24 The Social Construction of Gender.pptxmary850239
 
3.14.24 Gender Discrimination and Gender Inequity.pptx
3.14.24 Gender Discrimination and Gender Inequity.pptx3.14.24 Gender Discrimination and Gender Inequity.pptx
3.14.24 Gender Discrimination and Gender Inequity.pptxmary850239
 
The basics of sentences session 8pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 8pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 8pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 8pptx.pptxheathfieldcps1
 
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (FRIE...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (FRIE...BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (FRIE...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (FRIE...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
EDD8524 The Future of Educational Leader
EDD8524 The Future of Educational LeaderEDD8524 The Future of Educational Leader
EDD8524 The Future of Educational LeaderDr. Bruce A. Johnson
 
AI Uses and Misuses: Academic and Workplace Applications
AI Uses and Misuses: Academic and Workplace ApplicationsAI Uses and Misuses: Academic and Workplace Applications
AI Uses and Misuses: Academic and Workplace ApplicationsStella Lee
 
PHARMACOGNOSY CHAPTER NO 5 CARMINATIVES AND G.pdf
PHARMACOGNOSY CHAPTER NO 5 CARMINATIVES AND G.pdfPHARMACOGNOSY CHAPTER NO 5 CARMINATIVES AND G.pdf
PHARMACOGNOSY CHAPTER NO 5 CARMINATIVES AND G.pdfSumit Tiwari
 
30-de-thi-vao-lop-10-mon-tieng-anh-co-dap-an.doc
30-de-thi-vao-lop-10-mon-tieng-anh-co-dap-an.doc30-de-thi-vao-lop-10-mon-tieng-anh-co-dap-an.doc
30-de-thi-vao-lop-10-mon-tieng-anh-co-dap-an.docdieu18
 
UNIT I Design Thinking and Explore.pptx
UNIT I  Design Thinking and Explore.pptxUNIT I  Design Thinking and Explore.pptx
UNIT I Design Thinking and Explore.pptxGOWSIKRAJA PALANISAMY
 
Awards Presentation 2024 - March 12 2024
Awards Presentation 2024 - March 12 2024Awards Presentation 2024 - March 12 2024
Awards Presentation 2024 - March 12 2024bsellato
 
LEAD6001 - Introduction to Advanced Stud
LEAD6001 - Introduction to Advanced StudLEAD6001 - Introduction to Advanced Stud
LEAD6001 - Introduction to Advanced StudDr. Bruce A. Johnson
 
Arti Languages Pre Seed Send Ahead Pitchdeck 2024.pdf
Arti Languages Pre Seed Send Ahead Pitchdeck 2024.pdfArti Languages Pre Seed Send Ahead Pitchdeck 2024.pdf
Arti Languages Pre Seed Send Ahead Pitchdeck 2024.pdfwill854175
 
DNA and RNA , Structure, Functions, Types, difference, Similarities, Protein ...
DNA and RNA , Structure, Functions, Types, difference, Similarities, Protein ...DNA and RNA , Structure, Functions, Types, difference, Similarities, Protein ...
DNA and RNA , Structure, Functions, Types, difference, Similarities, Protein ...AKSHAYMAGAR17
 
2024.03.16 How to write better quality materials for your learners ELTABB San...
2024.03.16 How to write better quality materials for your learners ELTABB San...2024.03.16 How to write better quality materials for your learners ELTABB San...
2024.03.16 How to write better quality materials for your learners ELTABB San...Sandy Millin
 
25 CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT 2023 – BÀI TẬP PHÁT TRIỂN TỪ ĐỀ MINH HỌA...
25 CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT 2023 – BÀI TẬP PHÁT TRIỂN TỪ ĐỀ MINH HỌA...25 CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT 2023 – BÀI TẬP PHÁT TRIỂN TỪ ĐỀ MINH HỌA...
25 CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT 2023 – BÀI TẬP PHÁT TRIỂN TỪ ĐỀ MINH HỌA...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Quantitative research methodology and survey design
Quantitative research methodology and survey designQuantitative research methodology and survey design
Quantitative research methodology and survey designBalelaBoru
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Material Remains as Source of Ancient Indian History & Culture.ppt
Material Remains as Source of Ancient Indian History & Culture.pptMaterial Remains as Source of Ancient Indian History & Culture.ppt
Material Remains as Source of Ancient Indian History & Culture.ppt
 
3.12.24 The Social Construction of Gender.pptx
3.12.24 The Social Construction of Gender.pptx3.12.24 The Social Construction of Gender.pptx
3.12.24 The Social Construction of Gender.pptx
 
3.14.24 Gender Discrimination and Gender Inequity.pptx
3.14.24 Gender Discrimination and Gender Inequity.pptx3.14.24 Gender Discrimination and Gender Inequity.pptx
3.14.24 Gender Discrimination and Gender Inequity.pptx
 
The basics of sentences session 8pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 8pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 8pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 8pptx.pptx
 
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (FRIE...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (FRIE...BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (FRIE...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (FRIE...
 
EDD8524 The Future of Educational Leader
EDD8524 The Future of Educational LeaderEDD8524 The Future of Educational Leader
EDD8524 The Future of Educational Leader
 
t-test Parametric test Biostatics and Research Methodology
t-test Parametric test Biostatics and Research Methodologyt-test Parametric test Biostatics and Research Methodology
t-test Parametric test Biostatics and Research Methodology
 
Least Significance Difference:Biostatics and Research Methodology
Least Significance Difference:Biostatics and Research MethodologyLeast Significance Difference:Biostatics and Research Methodology
Least Significance Difference:Biostatics and Research Methodology
 
AI Uses and Misuses: Academic and Workplace Applications
AI Uses and Misuses: Academic and Workplace ApplicationsAI Uses and Misuses: Academic and Workplace Applications
AI Uses and Misuses: Academic and Workplace Applications
 
PHARMACOGNOSY CHAPTER NO 5 CARMINATIVES AND G.pdf
PHARMACOGNOSY CHAPTER NO 5 CARMINATIVES AND G.pdfPHARMACOGNOSY CHAPTER NO 5 CARMINATIVES AND G.pdf
PHARMACOGNOSY CHAPTER NO 5 CARMINATIVES AND G.pdf
 
30-de-thi-vao-lop-10-mon-tieng-anh-co-dap-an.doc
30-de-thi-vao-lop-10-mon-tieng-anh-co-dap-an.doc30-de-thi-vao-lop-10-mon-tieng-anh-co-dap-an.doc
30-de-thi-vao-lop-10-mon-tieng-anh-co-dap-an.doc
 
UNIT I Design Thinking and Explore.pptx
UNIT I  Design Thinking and Explore.pptxUNIT I  Design Thinking and Explore.pptx
UNIT I Design Thinking and Explore.pptx
 
Awards Presentation 2024 - March 12 2024
Awards Presentation 2024 - March 12 2024Awards Presentation 2024 - March 12 2024
Awards Presentation 2024 - March 12 2024
 
LEAD6001 - Introduction to Advanced Stud
LEAD6001 - Introduction to Advanced StudLEAD6001 - Introduction to Advanced Stud
LEAD6001 - Introduction to Advanced Stud
 
Arti Languages Pre Seed Send Ahead Pitchdeck 2024.pdf
Arti Languages Pre Seed Send Ahead Pitchdeck 2024.pdfArti Languages Pre Seed Send Ahead Pitchdeck 2024.pdf
Arti Languages Pre Seed Send Ahead Pitchdeck 2024.pdf
 
DNA and RNA , Structure, Functions, Types, difference, Similarities, Protein ...
DNA and RNA , Structure, Functions, Types, difference, Similarities, Protein ...DNA and RNA , Structure, Functions, Types, difference, Similarities, Protein ...
DNA and RNA , Structure, Functions, Types, difference, Similarities, Protein ...
 
Problems on Mean,Mode,Median Standard Deviation
Problems on Mean,Mode,Median Standard DeviationProblems on Mean,Mode,Median Standard Deviation
Problems on Mean,Mode,Median Standard Deviation
 
2024.03.16 How to write better quality materials for your learners ELTABB San...
2024.03.16 How to write better quality materials for your learners ELTABB San...2024.03.16 How to write better quality materials for your learners ELTABB San...
2024.03.16 How to write better quality materials for your learners ELTABB San...
 
25 CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT 2023 – BÀI TẬP PHÁT TRIỂN TỪ ĐỀ MINH HỌA...
25 CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT 2023 – BÀI TẬP PHÁT TRIỂN TỪ ĐỀ MINH HỌA...25 CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT 2023 – BÀI TẬP PHÁT TRIỂN TỪ ĐỀ MINH HỌA...
25 CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT 2023 – BÀI TẬP PHÁT TRIỂN TỪ ĐỀ MINH HỌA...
 
Quantitative research methodology and survey design
Quantitative research methodology and survey designQuantitative research methodology and survey design
Quantitative research methodology and survey design
 

Causation

  • 1. But it wasn’t just me! Causation So, you’ve done an act (or failed to act)… But V does something to make the harm worse… Or a third party does something to make the harm worse… Or the medical staff make a mistake which makes the harm worse… Are you still liable?
  • 2. What is Causation? As well as establishing that D has done (or failed to do!) something, and meant to do it, we also have to prove that the act actually lead to the harm to V. This is called the chain of causation. D’s actions V’s harm Imagine this…. You cause a paper cut to Miss Hart. Twenty minutes later Bob stabs Miss Hart and she dies of blood loss. Are you responsible for her death? You stab Miss Hart once with a knife. Twenty minutes later Bob stabs Miss Hart once as well and she dies of blood loss. Are you responsible for her death?
  • 3. A conundrum… Louis pushes Dave off the Empire State Building. Unknown to him, Reginald is firing his gun out of the window of a room on the 43rd floor. As Dave falls past Reginald’s window, one of the bullets hits him, killing him instantly. Dave hits the floor. Who is legally responsible for his death?
  • 4. General rules: This is the last legal step that is taken to establish D’s legal responsibility for the result (normally a death) Legal CausationFactual Causation White 1910 Thabo Meli ‘but for’ More than Minimal Substantive Operative
  • 5. Got the basic principles? James has been stabbed forty times. Sam comes along and pricks the end of his finger with a drawing pin. James dies Some of you might even be able to: Discuss how the legal principles might affect the outcome with the following variations to the facts: What if James had been stabbed by forty people, each inflicting one wound? How would causation affect their liability? What if the car that hit Gladys was speeding down a one way street the wrong way? Use your understanding to decide whether Sam and Nigel are liable for the deaths in the scenarios below: Nigel pulls a knife on Bob who runs down the pavement and hits Gladys. Gladys falls into the road and is hit by a car and dies E Grade Make a decision! C Grade Apply each test to the scenario to explain how he meets it. A Grade Use a supporting case, which you explain and link to the scenario
  • 6. Breaking the chain Key Vocabulary: Novus actus interveniens (new intervening act) The courts have established a number of situations which may break the chain of causation, but please be aware that in reality it is very, very hard to break it! After all, D has normally done something bad, even if someone else made the harm worse. These are known as new intervening acts.
  • 7. Possible Break One: Unreasonable Actions of V Roberts 1971 Majoram 2000 Williams & Davis 1992 Scenario: V tries to escape D and is injured in the attempt.... Is D liable for the harm?
  • 8. Possible Break Two: Unreasonable Actions of Third Party Scenario: D causes V some harm, but someone else also does something to harm V. Is D liable for the harm caused by the third party, even if they make it worse? R v Pagett 1983 R v Rafferty 2007 “the free deliberate and informed intervention of a second person who intends to exploit the situation created by the first, but is not acting on concert with him, is normally held to relieve the first actor of criminal responsibility”.
  • 9. Some further considerations: ‘Palpably Wrong’ Medical Treatment R v Jordan 1956 R v Smith 1959 D actions were still “operative and substantive” Only break if so independent of original wound to be a new chain of causation. AO2: Do you think that the outcome of this case was just and fair to D? The doctors actions did break the chain. Important Material Facts: How bad can it be, and still maintain the chain? …so when might it actually break the chain?
  • 10. Cheshire 1991 Possible Break One: ‘Palpably Wrong’ Medical Treatment D causes V some harm, but medical treatment makes the harm worse, or even kills them! Is D liable for the harm? 1. Did Cheshire succeed in his appeal? 2. Outline the main facts of the case, in no more than two bullet points! 3. Why was D appealing his conviction? 4. Were the gunshot wounds considered the substantial and operative cause of death by the court? 5. Why do you think that the courts prefer to blame Cheshire instead of the doctors? 6. When might the actions of the Doctors break the chain of causation? 7. Who do you think caused the death of the victim? Why? Reason your answer using the tests! Challenge: The Times chose the headline “no such thing as murder by halves”. How true is that as a statement of the law?
  • 11. D had lost his daughter and blamed his mother for having killed her. His mother did not deny her responsibility and promised to commit suicide. Eight days later she still had not done it. The man then came into her hut with a stick and some rope. He tied the rope to a rafter, made a noose at the other end, and urged his mother to "Get up and hang yourself." The woman asked for something to stand on. The man put a block of wood under the rope. He then left the hut and watched his mother get up on the block of wood, put the noose around her neck, and kick the block away. Did the man cause the death of his mother? Consolidation In your hand outs, answer the question, using at least two cases to support your conclusions.
  • 12. Louis pushes Dave off the Empire State Building. Unknown to him, Reginald is firing his gun out of the window of a room on the 43rd floor. As Dave falls past Reginald’s window, one of the bullets hits him, killing him instantly. Dave hits the floor. Who is legally responsible for his death? Reason, using at least one case in your discussion! Plenary: So can you answer the problem?
  • 13. Starter: Which is the odd one out in each set of pictures?
  • 14. Some other things which might break it... R v Malcherek & Steel 1981 Life Support Machines D’s beliefs, state of mind or inherent weakness. R v Blaue 1975 Holland 1841Dear 1996
  • 15. Consolidation: Have you got the essentials? Student Task: All of you will produce your own chain of causation diagram in your work books, identifying the issues which may affect D’s liability. Most of you will be able to support the identification of an issue’ with reference to a key case illustrating the test or area affected. Some of you will be able to identify a contrasting case to illustrate the limits of the issues affecting the chain of causation.
  • 16. Applying the Law: Are the following defendants still liable? Problem Causation Potential Break(s) Because…(link to cases) Overall Liability. Bob rejects Vicky’s advances, so she stabs him. He is taken to hospital where it is discovered he has a rare blood type and the hospital does not have enough supplies of his blood. He dies. In the exam you will have a long problem question. If someone dies, it may be that you will be asked to comment on causation issues that arise. This means that you need to know the cases, tests and be able to apply and discuss what that means for D. To start you off, we will only look at the causation issues affecting the following DD. Look at your homework problems for guidance on how to answer these.
  • 17. Now you have a go! Gary decides to rob a bank. He takes his girlfriend with him as a getaway driver. The robbery goes wrong and armed police arrive. He tries to escape and uses his girlfriend as shield. The police start firing and his girlfriend dies. Dave is fed up of his wife. He decides to kill her and puts an overdose of arsenic in her morning tea. She takes a couple of sips and passes out. Thinking she is dead, Dave drags her out of the house, whacking her head on the pavement. He dumps her in the skip at the bottom of the street. She is found and taken to hospital, where it is discovered that she has extensive brain damage, and the doctors declare her dead, turning off the life support machine.
  • 18. Section C Exam Question Section C Guidance Answer one out of a choice of two questions 20 marks… 20 minutes ALL AO2 application marks (no cases!)  5 Bullet points. Start with definition Conclude on statement’s accuracy with a reason Treat each statement separately Damian and Juan are arguing and Damian pulls out a knife. Juan runs into the road and knocks over a cyclist, Brenda. Juan suffers bruising and a small cut from the collision. Brenda falls under the wheels of Manuel’s car and suffers head injuries. Brenda has an unusually thin skill and dies. Juan is scared to run into Damian again, and refuses to go to the doctor to get his injuries checked. After a couple of weeks, his cut has become infected and he develops gangrene. Finally, he goes to hospital where Dr Smith advises him to have the finger amputated. Damian agrees, but Dr Smith cuts off the wrong finger, and the gangrene spreads, killing Juan. Evaluate the accuracy of each of the four statements A, B, C, and D individually, as they apply to the facts in the above scenario. Statement A: Damian is not liable for the bruising suffered by Juan because he did not hurt Juan in the first place. Statement B: Damian is not liable for the death of Brenda because she has an unusually thin skill. Statement C: Damian is not responsible for Juan’s death as it was Dr Smith’s error which caused the death. Statement D: Damian is not responsible for Juan’s death Juan chose not to get treatment.
  • 19. Example Answer: Damian and Juan are arguing and Damian pulls out a knife. Juan runs into the road and knocks over a cyclist, Brenda. Juan suffers bruising and a small cut from the collision. Brenda falls under the wheels of Manuel’s car and suffers head injuries. Brenda has an unusually thin skill and dies. Juan is scared to run into Damian again, and refuses to go to the doctor to get his injuries checked. After a couple of weeks, his cut has become infected and he develops gangrene. Finally, he goes to hospital where Dr Smith advises him to have the finger amputated. Damian agrees, but Dr Smith cuts off the wrong finger, and the gangrene spreads, killing Juan. Evaluate the accuracy of each of the four statements A, B, C, and D individually, as they apply to the facts in the above scenario. Statement A: Damian is not liable for the bruising suffered by Juan because he did not hurt Juan in the first place. • In order to be liable, Damian must have legally and factually caused the harm to Juan, without any unforeseeable interventions occurring. • Damian’s harm does not have to be the only cause, but it must be a more than minimal cause, which it is as it caused Juan to run away and be hit, and thus need to go to hospital. • If he hadn’t have taken out the knife, then Juan would not have needed to go to hospital, and so he also passes the legal test as his acts are a more than minimal cause of the harm. • As Damian is both legally and factually responsible, the only thing that could relieve him of liability would be Juan’s acts in running away. However these aren’t so daft as to be unforeseeable as it is reasonable for someone to run from a knife, so the chain is not broken. • Therefore the statement is not accurate as Damian is both legally and factually liable for the bruising.
  • 20. Now for our class turn. Damian and Juan are arguing and Damian pulls out a knife. Juan runs into the road and knocks over a cyclist, Brenda. Juan suffers bruising and a small cut from the collision. Brenda falls under the wheels of Manuel’s car and suffers head injuries. Brenda has an unusually thin skill and dies. Juan is scared to run into Damian again, and refuses to go to the doctor to get his injuries checked. After a couple of weeks, his cut has become infected and he develops gangrene. Finally, he goes to hospital where Dr Smith advises him to have the finger amputated. Damian agrees, but Dr Smith cuts off the wrong finger, and the gangrene spreads, killing Juan. Evaluate the accuracy of each of the four statements A, B, C, and D individually, as they apply to the facts in the above scenario. Statement B: Damian is not liable for the death of Brenda because she has an unusually thin skill.
  • 21. … and finally, your turn. Damian and Juan are arguing and Damian pulls out a knife. Juan runs into the road and knocks over a cyclist, Brenda. Juan suffers bruising and a small cut from the collision. Brenda falls under the wheels of Manuel’s car and suffers head injuries. Brenda has an unusually thin skill and dies. Juan is scared to run into Damian again, and refuses to go to the doctor to get his injuries checked. After a couple of weeks, his cut has become infected and he develops gangrene. Finally, he goes to hospital where Dr Smith advises him to have the finger amputated. Damian agrees, but Dr Smith cuts off the wrong finger, and the gangrene spreads, killing Juan. Evaluate the accuracy of each of the four statements A, B, C, and D individually, as they apply to the facts in the above scenario. Statement C: Damian is not responsible for Juan’s death as it was Dr Smith’s error which caused the death. Statement D: Damian is not responsible for Juan’s death Juan chose not to get treatment. Complete the answer for statements A and B, to demonstrate your skills.
  • 22. Terminology: Canyouidentifytheterm fromthedefinition? Where X does an act so daft, that D is no longer responsible for the outcome. Where D takes their victim as they find them, with their underlying physical weaknesses, beliefs or decisions. Something which may break the chain of causation and relieve D of their liability. Where the treatment is so wrong that it constitutes a new chain of causation. D’s harm to V must still be functioning and significant enough when V dies for D to be liable.
  • 23. Got the essentials?: Can you name the case… 1. Her heart wasn’t up to the drink. 2. I was only trying to touch her lovely coat. She didn’t need to jump! 3. She’s definitely not a shield – despite the size of her stomach. 4. I don’t care what you believe... as Jehovah is my witness. 5. Oh! So that’s the one you’re allergic to. Are you sure? 6. Fish and chips can be dangerous 7. Who knew soldiers could be that clumsy?