Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Wilson's Fundations. level 1
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Wilson's Fundations. level 1

1,723

Published on

A brief overview of Fundations, Wilson Language Basics, Level 1.

A brief overview of Fundations, Wilson Language Basics, Level 1.

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,723
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
13
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Fundations is an adaptation of the Wilson Reading System, created by Barbara A. Wilson.The Wilson Reading System was published in 1988. Fundations was published in 2002. (FCRR)
  • Fundations is an adaptation of the Wilson Reading System. The WRS is a remedial program based on the principles of Orton-Gillingham methodology. Intended to teach reading and writing skills to students who struggle, including those with language learning disability or dyslexia.Fundations, however, is intended to provide the foundations for life-long literacy for all children.Whole Class: Fundations would be the core program. The 20-30 min. instruction should be combined with literature-based instruction. The struggling students (30th %ile) should have additional targeted instruction in a small group setting.Lowest 30th %-ile: 40-60 min. per day includes the 20-25 min. lesson and then supplemental activities. This is when Fundations is not used in the general classroom.Language Learning Disability: to be combined with a literature-based program. An alternative to a non-WRS core LA program.Language Learning Disability: to be combined with a literature-based program. An alternative to a non-WRS core LA program.
  • Wilson’s Fundations claims to cover all 5 of the key reading components identified by the National Reading Panel, as well as some others.
  • Day 1: Drill sounds with focus on student needs; Segment and blend words for reading; “Word Talk” vocabulary words; Flash cards for Trick Words.Day 2: Drill sounds using large and standard sound cards; fluency drills with sounds, words, non-real words, Trick Words, and phrases; Group practice and chart success for individuals.Day 3: Drill sounds; Echo find letters/words; Dictation sounds, words, and Trick Words (on dry erase boards); Fluency drills sounds and words.Day 4: Drill sounds with focus on student needs; “Word Talk” vocabulary words; Flash cards for Trick Words; Fluency drills trick words and non-real words and chart success for individuals.Day 5: Drill sounds; Fluency drills for phrases; Group practice and chart success for individuals; Work on prosody with Unit story.
  • Fundations Teachers Manual, Student Composition Book (daily writing, unit assessments), Student Notebook (sounds, spelling, vocabulary in ABC order), Magnetic Letter Board, Sound Cards, White Board (for letter/word writing practice), Alphabet on a sentence strip, Mother Echo, Baby Echo
  • Sound Cards: so explicit that students are able to help lead the group. Students love playing the “teacher.” (Show only the first 30-45 seconds.)Fundations Dictation: a small group example (2 girls) but this is identical to what would be done in a whole group as well.
  • This is a simplified version of what is given in the teacher’s manual on pg. 158-159. Each level has its own scope and sequence which builds upon previous levels and brings back skills from previous levels/units to review.
  • Great for first-year or veteran teachers. Not only does the program promote explicit instruction for students, but it provides explicit instruction for teachers as well. Fundations itself claims to be a non-comprehensive program because it does not have the element of literature based instruction. However, I believe that if having literature which corresponds to those skills being taught, it would have immediate practical implications for the students and therefore provide more motivation for the students to learn, rather than simple rote repetition.
  • As long as the teacher is prepared, everything should work wonderfully. Preparation is a key element in the success of this program. This program is meant to work in conjunction with a literature-based program, so it is important to do these programs in tandem. One without the other will not be as successful.
  • WWC found only two studies on Fundations, but neither were eligible for review within their standards. Therefore, they cannot determine if Fundations actually “works.”
  • Transcript

    • 1. Maria Reiss Fundations – Level 1
    • 2. •Method Based on Principles of Orton-Gillingham Methodology Systematic, sequential, and multi-sensory • Three Potential Implementations • Whole Class • • 20-30 min. per day With additional instruction for struggling students Students in Lowest 30th Percentile Lowest 30th Percentile Daily lesson, plus supplemental activities 40-60 min. per day Students with a Language Learning Disability Language Learning Disability • • Whole Class • One to one instruction, or small group 20-30 min. daily lesson 25-30 min. 1:1 instruction 30-60 min. decodable text
    • 3. •Components Emphasized The 5 Key Components, along with others Phonemic Awareness • Phonics • Vocabulary • Fluency • Comprehension • • • • Letter Formation Phonological Awareness Sound Mastery • • • • Letter to sound Sound to letter Sight Word Instruction Written Composition
    • 4. •Instructional Design Structure of a 5 Day Week Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 •Drill sounds •Segment and blend words •“Word •Drill •Fluency sounds with sound cards •Group Practice talk” vocabulary words •Trick Words sounds •Echo find letters and words drills (sounds, words, non-real words, TW, phrases) •Dictation sounds •Fluency drills (sounds/ words) •Drill sounds •“Word talk” vocabulary words •Trick •Drill •Group •Drill sounds •Fluency drills (phrases) Words •Fluency drills (trick words) Practice •Prosody (unit story)
    • 5. •Materials Used • Fundations Teacher’s Manual • Student Composition Book • Sound Cards • Student Notebook • • • Sounds Spelling Vocabulary • ABC order • Magnetic Letter Board
    • 6. •Videos • Sound Cards • Whole group example of students saying and echoing with sound cards • Fundations Dictation • An example of small group work on dictation, tapping out words, spelling and writing
    • 7. •Scope and Sequence Level 1: 14 Units (2-3 weeks each) 1 New Skill Introduction 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Blending/reading new sounds . . . . . Segmenting/ spelling/ syllable types . . . . . . . . . . Phonemic Awareness Skills . . . Sentence Dictation . . Trick Words . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prosody with Echo Reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Story Re-telling . Baseword/suffix Story Structure/ Text Types Composition Skills . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    • 8. •Strengths and Weaknesses STRENGTHS • • • • • • • • Explicit and Systematic Engages with all 5 Key Components of Reading Teaches for Mastery of Concepts Interactive Multi-sensory Teacher Friendly Whole Group or Individualized Aligns with Common Core State Standards WEAKNESSES • No Literature-based instruction
    • 9. •Evaluation •Does Fundations do what it claims? •YES! •It is extremely systematic and explicit. •Its repetition and routines encourage growth in phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension.
    • 10. •Research •What Works Clearinghouse studies of Fundations® that fall within the scope of the Students with Learning Disabilities review protocol meet What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) evidence standards. The lack of studies meeting WWC evidence standards means that, at this time, the WWC is unable to draw any conclusions based on research about the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of Fundations® on students with learning disabilities.” •“No •WWC found two studies. •Pang, R. V. (2007). The effects of the Wilson Reading System and Fundations on the decoding skills of elementary students with reading disabilities. Unpublished master's thesis, California State University- San Marcos. •Ineligible •Robinson, because of study design and unequivalent group comparisons. C., & Wahl, M. (2004). Fundations. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Center for Reading Research. •Ineligible because it is a secondary analysis.
    • 11. •References • • • • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the national reading panel. Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Robinson, C., & Wahl, M. (2004). Fundations. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Center for Reading Research. Wilson, Barbara A. (2002). Fundations teacher's manual grades k-1. first edition. Oxford, MA: Wilson Language Training Corporation. WWC Intervention Report (2010). Fundations: students with learning disabilies. What Works Clearinghouse. Retrieved from: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/interventionreport.aspx?sid=196

    ×