This presentation describes the group development process for Valuenture Group. Several tools are used to uncover facts about member's perception on team-working results and processes. This presentation is an excellent example for describing the group dynamics. This presentation is done as part of assignment for the course title Leadership for Operational Development offered at KTH, Campus Telge, Sodertalje, Sweden.

1. Value On Future Group Development Report Valuenture Team Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) March. 2010

3. Team members profiles

4. Methodology

5. Models FIRO

6. Kurt – Lewin

8. Diversity Cohesiveness Thoroughness Interactive Conflicts Honesty Trust Ambitious Cohesiveness Ground Rules

9. INTRODUCTION

10. Brainstorming Interactive discussions in group meetings Questionnaire Filling out forms METHODOLOGIES

11. FIRO MODEL - OVERVIEW

12. FIRO MODEL - GENERIC OVERVIEW COMFORT Generic current situation within the model INITIAL IDYLL Commonly desired position

14. Ground rules contract

15. Leader election

16. Easy role positioning within the group

19. Confrontation and problem stage

20. Expectations

21. Culture

22. Communication

24. Previous relationship

25. Long duration of control phase

27. Close

28. Respectful but distant

29. The common goal forced the team to enter in the stage but not the natural performance

30. Backward movements to control stage

33. Common Interests

34. Friendship

35. Goal Clarity

36. Availability

37. Leadership

38. Commitment

39. Different Backround (Cultural)

40. Language barrier

41. Friendship

42. Role Clarity

45. CONCLUSIONS For us, solely achievement of goals is not success. How we achieve these goals is also of great importance.

47. Editor

48. Meeting Facilitator

50. Energizer

51. Fact finder

52. Consensus builder

53. Tension breaker

55. Solving Competing

56. Compromising

57. Avoiding

59. Participating , Delegating

60. Contingency Approach

62. Thank you