Wikimania 2009 - Yahoo Answers Community Moderation

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

3 comments

Comments 1 - 3 of 3 previous next Post a comment

Post a comment
Embed Video
Edit your comment Cancel

Notes on slide 1

as of

Don’t bite the newbie. Let them know what happened, why, what they can do about it.

groups/answers forced integration: got 1,000,000 thrown at abuse midtration, b/c it all exploed. The day someone spread monkey fecus all over mhy group.l gargage characters.  "WHy does god make us poop." it's b/c poop is the devils candy. community moderation: 10 in 30 seconds customer care: same in 23 hours.  On first run 40% accuracy:      Next 4 months. got it up a point at a time, got it up to 83%, and was very scared.      Was not machined learned - manually adjusted model, and ran for weeks, to test again.      When they launched it got up to 98%.      why different b/c they acted differently now that they got possitive feedback ffrom thier abuse reports.

5 Favorites

Wikimania 2009 - Yahoo Answers Community Moderation - Presentation Transcript

  1. Yahoo! Answers Community Moderation
    • Micah Alpern, Director of User Experience Yahoo! Search
    • Yahoo! Answers Ask, Answer, Discover
    • 1.2 million Q&A per day
    • Experiential Knowledge
    • Yahoo! Answers Ask, Answer, Discover
    • 1.2 million Q&A per day
    • Experiential Knowledge
  2. Activity
  3. Activity
  4.  
  5. Answers is a marketplace
    • People want lots of good answers to their questions quickly.
    • This means wide distribution of your freshest content.
    • Higher visibility for abuse in Questions than Answers.
    “ If you don't fix it right away, it's not worth fixing.” by getxsickphotography
  6. Traditional Moderation Failed
    • As Answers grew traditional moderation methods failed to scale with the community.
    • Manual customer care systems:
    • Had slow response times
    • Treated all abuse reports the same
    • Had high false positive and false negative rates
    • Were high cost and scaled up with traffic
  7. Machine learning? A team of PHDs worked on a black box abuse classifier.
    • Pre-filter of bad content to be reviewed by Customer Care.
    • Could only handle questions, not the answers
    • After a while that broke as well
    • 60% of reports were fake abuse by users trying to report others.
  8. Community Moderation
    • Deployed a new Community Moderation system
    •   Empowered trusted Answers users to help moderate content by allowing their report abuse actions to automatically delete content.
    •   System didn’t reveal reputation scores to users,
    • Encouraged them to report accurately so they could gain more community influence.
    Illustration by Bryce Glass To address these challenges:
  9. Reputation System
  10. Answers Moderation Model Hide Content Item? Content Reporter Author
  11. Answers Moderation Model REPORTER Abuse Suspicion Reputation REPORTER Community Investment Reputation User’s Abusive Reputation Confirmed Abuse Reporter Reputation Abuse Reporter Bootstrap Reputation Abuse Reporter Reputation CONTENT ITEM Abuse Reputation AUTHOR Overall Asker Reputation AUTHOR Overall Answerer Reputation AUTHOR Overall Asker Reputation Question Quality Reputation AUTHOR Overall Answerer Reputation Answer Quality Reputation Hide Content Item?
  12. the story of a report an abuse report comes in We need to decided: Who do we believe? Do we hide the content? A question is asked.. Author Reporter
  13.  
  14.  
  15. The content A question is asked..
    • What do we know about the content?
    • Have others reported it
    • Machined learned “Junk detector” score
      • Language specific
      • Requires tons of training data
      • != a quality detector
    CONTENT ITEM Abuse Reputation
  16. the reporter What do we know about the reporter? Reporter CONTENT ITEM Abuse Reputation
    • Past reporting performance
    • and it’s outcome
    08.17.08 4:41pm 08.20.08 6:23 pm 10.04.08 1:08 pm 11.06.08 7:03 am Past reporting behavior hidden not hidden hide overturned Outcome not hidden Confirmed Abuse Reporter Reputation Abuse Reporter Reputation For many reporters we don’t have enough feedback.
  17. How do we solve the cold start problem?
  18. Cold Start: Reporter Reputation Reporter
    • Suspicion: Implied Karma
    • Hard evidence
    • Examine signals across synonymous identities
    Confirmed Abuse Reporter Reputation Abuse Reporter Reputation CONTENT ITEM Abuse Reputation Take this result and update the running reputation of the content reported. Reporter’s Abuse Suspicion Reputation Reporter’s Community Investment Reputation User’s Abusive Reputation Abuse Reporter Bootstrap Reputation
  19. Compared to Illustration by Bryce Glass
  20. Do we trust the author? How good are they at Asking questions? How good are they at Answering? Do they have a history of abuse? AUTHOR Overall Asker Reputation AUTHOR Overall Answerer Reputation AUTHOR Overall Asker Reputation Question Quality Reputation AUTHOR Overall Answerer Reputation Answer Quality Reputation Users Abusive Reputation
  21. we make a decision an abuse report comes in A question is asked.. Reporter Author
  22.  
  23.  
  24. decisions can be revised an abuse report comes in A question is asked.. Reporter Trust level is re-instated and temporary protection assigned. Trust level for Reporting is decreased. Author
  25. Naive moderation
    • CraigsList
    • After 3 flags the post is deleted
    • Other systems: Ignore new user flags
    • In Answers:
    • Its harder to remove content from good contributors.
    • Easier for a even a new person to remove a spammer.
  26. So how did we do?
  27. Speed
  28. Accuracy
  29. Concussion
    • Reputation system helped Answers:
    • Scale & empower the community to mange abuse
    • Provide a better experience to Askers and Answerers
  30. Questions? Bryce Glass Randy Farmer Ori Zaltzman http://buildingreputation.com / Micah Alpern [email_address] twitter:malpern
  31.  
  32. SPAM
    •  “ We have other methods for identifying and dealing with spam, but as a very popular site we are a target for spammers so are continually upping our game to find new ways to identify them quicker and remove their content faster (though we shouldn’t share the methods we take). We recognize spam damages the experience for our users and so are committed to reducing spam on Answers as much as possible.”
  33. Chat and Low quality content
    • “ You mention this a bit in the presentation, but generally we acknowledge there are different types of questions being asked and answered on the site and accept that currently we’re limited in how we are identifying and highlighting knowledge based Q&A vs Social Q&A. However, we are looking at ways to easier promote the type of content a user wants to see.”
  34. Accuracy
    • “ focus is on experiential knowledge, practical help based on someone’s opinion or experience. Different type of knowledge than covered by wikipedia. We don’t want to publish content which is misleading, incorrect or harmful but use the “report abuse” system and our trusted users to balance any dubious advice.

+ Micah AlpernMicah Alpern, 2 months ago

custom

664 views, 5 favs, 1 embeds more stats

Yahoo! Answers is the largest Q&A service with hund more

More info about this document

© All Rights Reserved

Go to text version

  • Total Views 664
    • 577 on SlideShare
    • 87 from embeds
  • Comments 3
  • Favorites 5
  • Downloads 19
Most viewed embeds
  • 87 views on http://buildingreputation.com

more

All embeds
  • 87 views on http://buildingreputation.com

less

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

Cancel
File a copyright complaint
Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

Categories