Management
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Management

on

  • 4,484 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
4,484
Slideshare-icon Views on SlideShare
4,484
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
69
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Management Management Document Transcript

    • Question A.Explain why managers must manage the organization effectively and discuss theprocess of managementWhy managers must manage the organization?The managers must manage the organization effectively, so that they will able to detect andlocate problems to be solved that result in good decision making. As a manager we will beresponsible and accountable for ensuring that the work efforts of our employees are directedtowards the accomplishment of organizational objectives. In the way other it will enable us toassess the future and make plans for it.Process of management.1. Planning There are four process of management which is planning, organizing, leading and controlling. The planning process will set goals and defining the actions necessary to achieve those goals. To achieve that, they will involve into three steps that is deciding which goals the organization should pursue, deciding what courses of action to adopt to attain those goals and deciding how to allocate organizational resources. The outcome of the process is the organization’s strategy, a pattern of decisions concerning what goals to pursue, what action to take and what resources to use. Planning is very complex and difficult because of the level of uncertainty.2. Organizing The organizing process will determine the tasks to be done, who will do them, and how those tasks will be managed and coordinated. At this stage managers establish the structure of working relationships between organization members that best achieves organizational goals. Here it involves grouping people into departments according to the tasks they perform. Then the managers need to lay out lines of authority and responsibility between group and people. The outcome of the process is an organizational structure, the formal system of reporting relationships.
    • Principle and Practice of Management (MGT 420) Group Assignment 3. Leading The leading will manage the capacity the members of work groups toward the accomplishment of organizational goals. The managers determine direction, articulate a vision, and energize employees so that they can play a part in achieving goals. It requires a number of skill sets including understanding individual or group behavior dynamics, the ability to motivate employees, be affective communicators, able to envision future and share that vision and 3C’s Leadership Model. 4. Controlling The last process of management is controlling. It will monitor the performance of the organization and the progress in implementing strategic and operational plans. They will identify the deviations between planned actual actions. Then taking corrective action, so that it will ensure the organization is moving toward the achievement of its goals. This involves designing appropriate measurement and information and control systems. These four processes are essential to a manager’s job. Each manager at different position in the hierarchy is very importance to ensure the journey of organization will always smooth. The amount of time spent planning and organizing increases the higher up a manager is. The lower manager’s position, the more time spent leading and controlling others. Page 2 of 12
    • Principle and Practice of Management (MGT 420) Group Assignment Question B. Discuss the reasons why need to organize. Identify the different ways by which management can be departmentalization. Reasons why need to organize The organizing function is extremely important to the management system, because it is the primary mechanism in which managers activate plans. It is because the organizing has the ability to divide the work according to the nature and similarity of task. Other than that it also has the ability to pool resources and increase the efforts in which leads to efficiency and has the ability to build continuity and synergy. Departmentalization Structure Departmentalization structure is a process of grouping into separate unit activities or tasks that are intended. Organization can be departmentalized by five ways, that is, by Function, Product, Territory or Geography, Customer and Matrix. Definition of departmentalization is subdividing work and workers into separate organizational units responsible for completing particular tasks. Different ways management can be departmentalization. 1. Functional Departmentalization Functional departmentalization were involves the process of organizing work and workers into separate units responsible for particular business functions or areas of expertise. This is the most common organizational structure. Examples of such structure are in accounting, sales marketing HRM departments. Department will depend on the type of business a company is in. Functional departmentalization has some advantages. First, it allows work to be done by highly qualified specialists. While the accountants in the accounting department take responsibility for producing accurate revenue and expense figures, the engineers in research and development can focus their efforts on Page 3 of 12
    • Principle and Practice of Management (MGT 420) Group Assignment designing a product that is reliable and simple to manufacture. Second, it lowers costs by reducing duplication. When the engineers in research and development (R&D) come up with that fantastic new product, they don’t have to worry about creating an aggressive advertising campaign to sell it. That task belongs to the advertising experts and sales representatives in marketing. Third, with everyone in the same department having similar work experience or training, communication and coordination are less problematic for departmental managers. However, functional departmentalization has a number of disadvantages, too. To start, cross-department coordination can be difficult. Managers and employees are often more interested in doing what’s right for their function than in doing what’s right for the entire organization. A good example is the traditional conflict between marketing and manufacturing. Marketing typically pushes for spending more money to make more products with more accessories and capabilities to meet customer needs. By contrast, manufacturing pushes for fewer products with simpler designs, so that manufacturing facilities can ship finished products on time and keep costs within expense budgets. As companies grow, functional departmentalization may also lead to slower decision-making, and produce managers and workers with narrow experience and expertise. 2. Product Departmentalization The product departmentalization is a process that involves in organizing work and workers into separate units responsible for producing particular products or service. For example, like plastics, power systems, and information services. One of the advantages of product departmentalization is that, like functional departmentalization, it allows managers and workers to specialize in one area of expertise. Page 4 of 12
    • Principle and Practice of Management (MGT 420) Group Assignment However, unlike the narrow expertise and experiences in functional departmentalization, managers and workers develop a broader set of experiences and expertise related to an entire product line. Likewise, product departmentalization makes it easier for top managers to assess work-unit performance. Finally, because managers and workers are responsible for the entire product line rather than for separate functional departments, decision making should be faster, because there are fewer conflicts. The primary disadvantage of product departmentalization is duplication. For example that the Aircraft Engines and Appliances divisions both have Human Resources, Finance, and Sales departments. Likewise, the Medical System and NBC Television divisions both have Finance and General Counsel departments. Duplication like this often results in higher costs. A second disadvantage is that it can be difficult to achieve coordination across the different product departments. For example, GE would probably have difficulty standardizing its policies and procedures in product departments as different as the Lighting and Capital Services division. 3. Customer Departmentalization Customer departmentalization involves organizing work and workers into separate units responsible for particular kind of customers. For example, consumers, investors, shoppers, and business people. The primary advantage to customer to customer departmentalization is that it focuses the organization on customer needs rather than on products or business functions. Furthermore, creating separate departments to serve specific kinds of customers allows companies to specialize and adapt their products and services to customer needs and problems. Page 5 of 12
    • Principle and Practice of Management (MGT 420) Group Assignment The primary disadvantage of customer departmentalization is that, like product departmentalization, it leads to duplication of resources. Furthermore, like product departmentalization, it can be difficult to achieve coordination across different customer departments. Finally, the emphasis on meeting customers’ needs may lead workers to make decisions that please customers but hurt the business. 4. Geographic Departmentalization Organizing work and workers into separate units responsible for doing business in particular geographical areas is called geographic department. Example, Central, South, East, and North region. The primary advantage of geographic departmentalization is that it helps companies respond to the demands of different markets. This can be especially importance when selling in different countries. For example, CCE’s geographic divisions sell products suited to the taste preferences in different countries. CCE bottles and distributes the following product in Europe but not in the US.: Aquarius, Coca-Cola Light and Roses. Another advantage is that geographic departmentalization can reduce costs by locating unique organizational resources closer to customers. For instance, it is much cheaper for CCE to build bottling plants in Belgium than to bottle Coke in England and then transport it across the English Channel. 5. Matrix Departmentalization Matrix departmentalization is a hybrid organizational structure in which two or more forms of departmentalization, especially product and functional, used together. Most employees report to two bosses. This leads to more cross- functional interaction and requires significant coordination between functional and project managers. Page 6 of 12
    • Principle and Practice of Management (MGT 420) Group Assignment The primary advantage of matrix departmentalization is that it allows companies to efficiently manage large, complex tasks like researching, developing and marketing pharmaceuticals. Efficiency comes from avoiding duplication. For example, rather than having an entire marketing function for each project, the company simply assigns and reassigns workers from the marketing department as they are needed at various stages of product completion. More specifically, an employee from a department may simultaneously be part of five different ongoing projects, but may only be actively completing work on a few projects at a time. Another advantage is the ability to carry out large, complex tasks. Because of the ability to quickly pull in expert help from all the functional areas of the company, matrix project managers have a much more diverse set of expertise and experience at their disposal than do managers in the other forms of departmentalization. The primary disadvantage of matrix departmentalization is the high level of coordination required to manage the complexity involve with running large, ongoing projects at various levels of completion. Matrix structure are notorious for confusion and conflict between project bosses, or between project and functional bosses. Disagreements and misunderstanding about project schedules, budgets, available resources, and the availability with particular functional expertise are common. Another disadvantage is that matrix structures require much more management skill than the other form of departmentalization. Because of these problems, many matrix structures evolve from the simple matrix in which project and functional managers negotiate conflicts and resources, to the complex matrix, in which specialized matrix managers and departments are added to the organizational structure. In the complex matrix, project and functional manager report to the same matrix manager, who helps them sort out conflicts and problems. Page 7 of 12
    • Principle and Practice of Management (MGT 420) Group Assignment Question C. Discuss in details the different types of decision making and explain the four conditions in decision making process. Definition of decision making It is a process through which managers identify and resolve problems and capitalize on opportunities. According to Stoner, decision making is a process by DEFINING which a course of action is selected as away to deal with a specific problem. It is the selection on one alternative from among two or more alternative, or It is the process by which managers respond to the opportunities and threats that confront them by analyzing the options and making determinations about specific organizational goals and courses of action (Jones, George & Types of decision making 1. Programmed decision It is a repetitive decision that can be handled by a routine approach. It is usually made in accordance with some established habit, rule or procedure (STONER). An example would be the need to wear standard working uniforms upon working at THE STORE. Most decision making that relates to day-to-day running of an organization is programmed decision making. Programmed decision making is possible when managers have the information they need to create rules that will guide decision making. Page 8 of 12
    • Principle and Practice of Management (MGT 420) Group Assignment 2. Non-programmed decisions It is decision that a unique, unusual, or exceptional problem. The nature of problem that occurs is unstructured and something different. It requires higher level management participation. A good example is the Selangor government’s decision to remove the venue of pig slaughtering at section 15 Shah Alam to Rawang for fear of environmental pollution and outbreak from this pollution, thus affecting nearby population. In non-programmed decision managers make decision in the absence of decision rules, they must search for information about alternative courses of action and rely on intuition and judgment. This type of decision making causes the most problems for managers.Four conditions in decision making 1. The risk The manager has to weigh the risk of each course of action against the expected gains. There is no riskless action nor even riskless non-action. But what matters most is neither the expected gain anticipated risk, but the ratio between them. Every alternative should therefore contain an appraisal of the odds it carries. 2. Economy of effort Which of the possible lines of action will give the greatest results with the least effort, will obtain the needed change with the least necessary disturbance of the organization? Far too many managers pick an elephant gun to chase sparrows. Too many others use slingshots against forty-ton tanks. Page 9 of 12
    • Principle and Practice of Management (MGT 420) Group Assignment 3. Timing If the situation has great urgency, the preferable course of action is one that dramatizes the decision and serves notice on the organization that something important is happening. If on the other hand, long consistent effort is needed, a slow start that gathers momentum may be preferable. In some situations the solution must be final and must immediately lift the vision of the organization to a new goal. In others what matters most is to get the first step taken. The final goal can be shrouded in obscurity for the time being. Decisions concerning timing are extremely difficult to systematize. They elude analysis and depend on perception. But there is one guide. Wherever managers must change their vision to accomplish something new, it is best to be ambitious, to present to them the big view, the complete programs, the ultimate aim. Wherever they have to change their habits it may be best to take one step at a time, to start slowly and modestly, to do no more at first than is absolutely necessary. 4. Limitations of resources The most important resource whose limitations have to be considered, are the human beings who will carry out the decision. No decision can be better than the people who have to carry it out. Their vision, competence, skill and understanding determine what they can and cannot do. A course of action may well require more of these qualities than they possess today and yet be the only right programs. Then efforts must be made – and provided for in the decision – to raise the ability and standard of the people. Or new people may have to be found who have what it takes. This may sound obvious; but managements every day make decisions develop procedures, or enact policies without asking the question: do we have the means of carrying these things out? And do we have the people? Page 10 of 12
    • Principle and Practice of Management (MGT 420) Group Assignment The wrong decision must never be adopted because people and the competence to do what is right are lacking. The decision should always lie between genuine alternatives, that is, between courses of action every one of which will adequately solve the problem. And if the problem can be solved only by demanding more of people than they are capable of giving they must either learn to do more or be replaced by people who can. It is not solving a problem to find a solution that works on paper but fails in practice because human resources to carry it out are not available or are not in the place where they are needed. Page 11 of 12
    • Principle and Practice of Management (MGT 420) Group AssignmentReferences.Jaafar, H. (2000). Pengurusan Organisasi. Sintok, Kedah: UUM.Mukhtar, H. S. (2010). Principles and Practice of Management. Shah Alam: FPM, UiTM.Williams, K. (2003). Management a practical introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill.Raghavan, D. S. (2009). Fundamentals of Management. Retrieved January 23, 2011, from CAPL OUM:www.capl.oum.edu.my Page 12 of 12