Government And Social Computing - Presentation Transcript
Goldilocks and the Three Bears: a story about social computing in government Matthew Hodgson Web and Information Management Service Offering Lead, ACT SMS Management & Technology
Goldilocks and Porridge
Three Bears and Porridge
Information Disconnect
Govt. Department and Information Disconnect
The Problem
“ How can you determine what’s in these reports so that one world view can inform the other?”
“ How do you create business processes and tools that connects these two world views of information?”
- Mark Allenby, SMS Consultant
A typical approach Might meet the businesses needs Would it meet users’ needs?
Using a taxonomy?
Issues
Need to have a finite set of ‘things’ to build a good taxonomy
Content of reports are not finite and change over time
Doesn’t fit people’s personal view of information
No one will use it (except for the experts)
Extensibility
Taxonomy needs to be redesigned to adapt to new information
Issues
Good as a ‘filing cabinet’ for documents
Good for records managers
Not designed to match the way users’ think about their own information (corporate way only)
Not designed for other things like ‘sharing information’
Tower Software uses a wiki to share knowledge and information
Using TRIM?
A tagging approach
“… instead [of using a system], you may want to capture and communicate… the essence of what is talked about by using free text tagging (like they do with blogs and wikis)…”
- Matt’s response
Selling tagging Currently tracking over 8 million tags 5 years and millions of tags and users 8 years worth of tagged, public, online diary and information websites All user/self-classified information
Tagging = users’ view of information
Benefits for users:
Chosen by the user
Not part of a formal taxonomy (my way, not the corporate way of thinking)
Adapts easily to new information
Flexible and easy to use
Benefits for the business:
People want to use it - high level of participation
Information still gets classified
Tag clouds show frequency of terms for reporting
Applying Garrett’s User-Centred Design Methodology See also: http://www.jjg.net/ia/
Scope phase
Big gaps in information and little communications between stakeholders and the Department due to different world-views
Some documented process , but without documented workflow or governance
No tools or supporting systems
Solution
Facilitate information storage & communication
Create a place to share information and knowledge
Invite and encourage stakeholders to participate
Establish governance
Document roles and responsibilities
Document process
Provide tools and systems
Support business process
Support the way people think about their own information
If tools are usable they will be used
Focus on connecting people, information and knowledge
Tagging and Topic Maps Topic maps = connected information
Wikis to store knowledge
Department’s term in their Corporate taxonomy Related tags users have Created and related to the term ‘policy’
Social computing tools in this case study
Tagging
Good for user classification of information
Good for representing information based on the user’s own world-view
Wikis
Good for communication - sharing information and knowledge
Easy to create and maintain content
Easy and cheap to setup
Topic Maps
The glue that connects disconnected information
Key messages
The more our computers are connected, the more we realise how disconnected our information is
Social computing tools can connect people, information and knowledge
Use social computing tools in “smart ways” to serve growing user demand to interact directly with government
Remember to concentrate on the “social”-part, not the “computing” part
Presentation to Web Standards Group on 26 July 200 more
Presentation to Web Standards Group on 26 July 2007. Details a case study on the use of certain social computing tools -- wikis and tagging -- to bring allow two groups to share their world-views of information. less
0 comments
Post a comment