• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Smart Power Amplifier
 

Smart Power Amplifier

on

  • 4,099 views

Conventional power amplifier systems trade-off efficiency for linearity due to transistor operation limitations. The Smart Power Amplifier architecture improves RF Power Amplifier linearity without ...

Conventional power amplifier systems trade-off efficiency for linearity due to transistor operation limitations. The Smart Power Amplifier architecture improves RF Power Amplifier linearity without compromising efficiency. This novel invention generates and utilizes specialized outphased signals that can be used in outphasing RF power amplifiers in order to amplify the input signal without suffering from the nonlinearities and inefficiencies associated with conventional power amplifiers. Using this proposed technique, designers and developers can generate variable number of outphased signals on the fly with minimal processing and memory footprints. The proposed architecture for constructing and combining a variable number of constant amplitude outphased signals results in both highly linear and significantly efficient power amplification system. The complexities of both constructing and combining the decomposed signals are significantly reduced due to the fact that all of the decomposed signals except only two of them are actually scaled versions of the input signal.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
4,099
Views on SlideShare
4,097
Embed Views
2

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
12
Comments
0

2 Embeds 2

http://author.uthm.edu.my 1
https://www.linkedin.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Smart Power Amplifier Smart Power Amplifier Presentation Transcript

    • Smart Power Amplifier using variable number of constant amplitude decomposed signals --- and a dual phase modulator --- Phased array architecture for linear and efficient power amplification using an adaptive system of massively parallel power amplifiers2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 1/30
    • Power Amplifiers Classification nonlinearity and efficiency in RF power amplifiers Type* Linearity* Efficiency* A very high very low (~50%) A/B B high low (~78%) B/C C medium medium (~80%) : : low high : E very low very high (~90%) *Linearity: for EDGE, 56 dBc at 400 KHz offset from carrier is “very high” *Efficiency when transistor is at full power *Type/Class E is “switched-mode”2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 2/30
    • Power Amplifiers Classification nonlinearity concerns in RF power amplifiers• Linearity is defined by standard bodies: FCC, ETSI• Makes sure not to affect neighboring channels• Enforcing less distortion => Less interference => Less loss of information• Usually specified as Signal to Interferer Noise Ratio• Linearity specification is technology dependant2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 3/30
    • Power Amplifiers Classification efficiency needs in RF power amplifiers• Efficiency == Less Wasted Energy• Efficiency => Less Operational Expenses (OP-EX) => Lower Electrical Bills => Money Gain (+$)• Efficiency => Long Battery Life for Mobiles• Efficiency => Environmentally Friendly• Inefficiency => Heat Dissipation => Cooling Requirements => Noise because of Fans => More Heat Sink => Significantly Increased Size and Weight => Money Loss (-$) 2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 4/30
    • Outphasing Power Amplifiers of Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution (EDGE) Signals I 1 (t ) ⎫ ⎪ Ie ⎬ S1 (t ) ⎧ I (t ) EDGE filter Nonlinear Q1 (t ) ⎪ ⎪ Map ⎭ Modulator PA ⎪ ⎪S (t )⎨ Se RF Combiner I 2 (t ) ⎫ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎬ S 2 (t ) Q2 (t ) ⎪ Nonlinear ⎪Q(t ) ⎩ EDGE filter Map ⎭ Modulator PA Qe EDGE Signal Generation Modulation, amplification, and combining reconstructs the original EDGE signal Se Outphasing means ( I e , Qe ) At any point in time, Se=S1+S2,decomposing the signal vector but S1 and S2 have constant Se Se into two vectors S1 and S2 radiuses. with constant amplitudes S2 The intersection of those (0,0) (vectors rotating in circles of circles defines the outphased constant radiuses) S1 signals S1 and S22008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 5/30
    • Prior Art Search for RF power amplification techniquesCompeting Technologies a) Digital Pre-Distortion b) OutphasingImplementation of Outphasing 1) Lookup Tables 2) Inverse Sine & Inverse Cosine Computations 3) Complex Computation of the Square Root FunctionTypes of Decomposition A) 2-Phase Decomposition B) N-Phase Decomposition (Fixed Number of Signals = N) 2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 6/30
    • Closest Prior Art Ericsson fixed number of decomposed signals Title: Linear amplification system and methods using more than two constant length vectors Inventor: Paul Wilkinson Dent Assignee: Ericsson Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC (US) Number: US 6,311,046 Date: October 30, 2001 Issues: » fixed number of decomposed signals » complex combiner hardware2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 7/30
    • The New Idea Smart Power Amplifier Concept and Computations for Generating Variable Number of Constant Amplitude Decomposed Signals in Real-Time S5 S5 S4 S1 S3 ( I e , Qe ) ( I e , Qe ) S4 S2 Se S3 S1 Se S2 (0,0) (0,0)2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 8/30
    • The Invention Smart Power Amplifier (SPA) - Phased Array Architecture Adaptive PA Array S1 aS1 S2 aS2 S3 aS3 S aS Decomposer Combiner Si aSi Promise Sn aSn Linearity of Type A together with the Efficiency of Type E Power Amplification2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 9/30
    • Demonstrations2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 10/30
    • Demonstrations2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 11/30
    • Advantages of SPA characteristics and promises1. Efficiency is not compromised for linearity as done with the conventional outphasing power amplifiers.2. By using constant amplitude signals, we completely by-pass the issues of signal distortion due to the nonlinearity of individual power amplifiers.3. Performs variable phase decomposition at the cost of two phase decomposition plus a minimal constant overhead, regardless of the number of available PAs.4. For a given design, accuracy and efficiency requirements can be met by identifying the maximum number of PAs for the proposed architecture.5. Can be used with other kinds of signals, and not just with EDGE signals.6. Selection of maximum number of PAs is performed only once for each design (EDGE, CDMA, … etc.), and offline.7. Can be used in base-stations as well as in wireless handsets.8. Can be efficiently implemented as software or hardware (requires few cycles).9. Solution is transparent to receivers.2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 12/30
    • Dual Phase Modulator for improved efficiency and linearity of RF power amplifiers An extremely inexpensive and novel solution for the alignment problems in Outphasing Power Amplifiers using Q-filter Techniques2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 13/30
    • Problem and SolutionProblem: Outphasing is a technique used to improve RF poweramplifier efficiency without trading-off linearity.It is rarely used nowadays due to stringent branch alignmentrequirements imposed by stringent spectral requirements for digitalwireless transmission standards. Usually phase misalignment as littleas 3 degrees between the two branches can cause spectral emissionsand ACPR failures.Solution: We are proposing a new architecture where the twooutphased signals go through special DSP filtering (using nonlinearQ-filters) optimized to improve spectral content (and thus relaxing thealignment requirement up to 8 degrees or higher) without sacrificingthe desirable low Peak-To-Average Power Ratio (Crest Factor) of theoutphased signals.2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 14/30
    • I1 (t ) ⎫ ⎪ Ie Nonlinear ⎬ S 1 (t ) ⎧ I (t ) EDGE filter Q 1 (t ) ⎪ Modulator ⎪ Map ⎭ PA ⎪ ⎪ S (t ) ⎨ Se RF Combiner I 2 (t ) ⎫ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎬ S 2 (t ) Nonlinear ⎪Q (t ) ⎩ EDGE filter Q 2 (t ) ⎪ ⎭ Modulator PA Qe Map e.g. EDGE Signal Modulation, amplification, and combining Generation Existing Outphasing Solution reconstructs the original EDGE signal Se Adding specially optimized DSP filtering (with nonlinear Q-filters) can dramatically improve spectral content without sacrificing low Crest Factor I1 (t ) ⎫ ⎪ Ie Nonlinear ⎬ S 1 (t ) ⎧ I (t ) EDGE filter Q 1 (t ) ⎪ Optimized Modulator PA ⎪ Map ⎭ Q-Filter ⎪ ⎪S (t ) ⎨ Se RF Combiner I 2 (t ) ⎫ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎬ S 2 (t ) Optimized Nonlinear ⎪Q (t ) ⎩ EDGE filter Q 2 (t ) ⎪ ⎭ Modulator PA Qe Map Q-Filter e.g. EDGE Signal Modulation, amplification, and combining Generation Q-filter Based Solution reconstructs the original EDGE signal Se 2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 15/30
    • Spectral Contentsimproved by about 10dB, thus leading to more relaxed alignment requirements2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 16/30
    • Crest Factordegraded by only 0.67dB, thus still maintaining low Peak-To-Average Power Ratio (Our experiments show that using FIR linear filters does not maintain good Crest Factor, whileoptimizing the Q-filter showed good control and trading-off spectral contents versus Crest Factor) Original EDGE Outphased Signal After Applying Optimized Signal Before Q-filtering Nonlinear Q-filter CF=3.5dB CF=0dB CF=0.67dB 2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 17/30
    • Using LinearFIR-FilterCrest Factor getsworse thanoriginal signal Outphased 1 FIR-Filtered 1 Good Crest Factor Bad Crest Factor Bad Spectral Content Good Spectral Content Outphased 2 FIR-Filtered 2 Good Crest Factor Bad Crest Factor Bad Spectral Content Good Spectral Content Original Signal Amplify then Combine (e.g. EDGE) to Get Original Signal Constellation Diagrams 2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 18/30
    • Using NonlinearQ-FilterNote that CrestFactor and SpectralContent gets better Outphased 1 Q-Filtered 1 Good Crest Factor Good Crest Factor Bad Spectral Content Good Spectral Content Outphased 2 Q-Filtered 2 Good Crest Factor Good Crest Factor Bad Spectral Content Good Spectral Content Original Signal Amplify then Combine (e.g. EDGE) to Get Original Signal Constellation Diagrams 2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 19/30
    • Phase Misalignment Effect 10o 60o Error Vector Magnitude (EVM) = 1 – 2*sin(30+10/2)= 14% 3GPP Spec ~ 17% Thus, up to 10o of phase error is tolerable.2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 20/30
    • Prior ArtLinear amplification systems and methods using more than two constant length vectors:6311046, Ericsson Inc., Oct 30, 2001http://www.google.com/patents?vid=USPAT6311046&id=Q2sIAAAAEBAJ&dq=outphasing+ericssonDescribes a method to improve alignment and spectral contents, but relies on using four branches with conjugate signals,which degrades efficiency considerably and adds need to four modulators and more complex architecture.Hybrid Chireix/Doherty amplifiers and methods:6133788, Ericsson Inc., Oct 17, 2000http://www.google.com/patents?vid=USPAT6133788&id=KQcGAAAAEBAJ&dq=outphasing+ericssonDescribes a way to increase efficiency by using special combining technique, but will still suffer from traditional outphasingproblems, like branch alignment accuracy …etc.Outphasing modulator:7009447, Intel Corporation, Mar 7, 2006http://www.google.com/patents?vid=USPAT7009447&id=_bJ3AAAAEBAJ&dq=outphasingDoes not describe how to solve the alignment problem. It details a method to outphase the signals, but will still suffer fromtraditional outphasing problems, like branch alignment accuracy …etc.Method and apparatus to match output impedance of combined outphasing power amplifiers:7030714, Intel Corporation, Apr 18, 2006http://www.google.com/patents?vid=USPAT7030714&id=g9J3AAAAEBAJ&dq=outphasingDescribes a unique way of combining both branches to achieve maximum efficiency, but will still suffer from traditionaloutphasing problems, like branch alignment accuracy …etc.RF power amplifier and methods for improving the efficiency thereof:6825719, Intel Corporation, Nov 30, 2004http://www.google.com/patents?vid=USPAT6825719&id=d9oRAAAAEBAJ&dq=outphasingDescribes a way to control the phase at the output of the PA, but will still suffer from traditional outphasing problems, likebranch alignment accuracy …etc. 2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 21/30
    • Benefits• Improve user experience by improving battery life. It is estimated that using this technique, PA can achieve about 25% more efficiency than traditional methods.• Improve cost by using much cheaper and smaller nonlinear PA operating in Class C. It is estimated that we only need half the size PA when using filtered outphasing to achieve same PA performance, besides no need to any linearity requirements on the PA thus improving yield.• Eliminate need of costly outphasing alignment techniques.• Shift PA performance optimization to the digital domain instead of the RF domain, giving much more controllability and ease of design, thus improving Time-To-Market.• Achieve a new method that allows improving PA efficiency (and thus battery life) without compromising linearity, and have all the controls in the digital domain.• Easy to implement and far superior to other outphasing or PA linearization techniques.• Achieve a practical architecture for current generation wireless standards with high Crest Factor (like HSUPA), and for next generation wireless standards with high Crest Factor (like WiMAX and other OFDM standards).• High Crest Factor is imposing battery life constrains and cost constrains (due to need of bigger linear PA) that can be solved by using very low Crest Factor techniques.• Extendable to Smart Power Amplifiers. 2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 22/30
    • Backup2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 23/30
    • Q-Measure ConceptFuzzy Measure Axioms Q-Measure Extensions (2003)Let A, B ⊂ X be non-intersecting sets for any choice of λ >-1, λ!=0, define:• Boundary conditions: m ( Φ ) = 0, m ( X ) = 1 ∏ (1 + λf i ) − 1 xi ∈ A q ( A) = , λ ≥ -1, λ ≠ 0• Monotonicity: A1 ⊂ A2 → m ( A1 ) ≤ m ( A2 ) ∏ (1 + λf xi ∈ X i ) −1• Continuity: where fi ε [0,1] are density generators guaranteed for discrete spaces Convergence Behavior of Q-MeasuresProbability Measure (1933) 1.05replaces monotonicity by additivity: 1.025 p ( A U B ) = p ( A) + p ( B ) Scaling Factor, fn 1 0.975 C as e 1 C as e 2Sugeno λ-Measure (1975) 0.95 C as e 3 0.925adds one more axiom: 0.9g ( A U B ) = g ( A) + g ( B ) + λ g ( A) g ( B ) 0.875 0 2 4 6 8 10 12for a unique λ that satisfies g(X)=1 I te ra ti o n , n 2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 24/30
    • Q-Measures in a nutshell X x1 x2 x3 A∪ B = X A q-measures provide A∩ B = Φ x6 x5 x4 more expressive and α = f ( A) > 0 computationally attractive β = f ( B) > 0 B=Ac nonlinear models λ ≥ −1 x7 x8 x9 ρ = f ( A ∪ B) = α + β + λαβ > 0 for uncertainty α α q ( A) = = q(Ac) management ρ α + β + λαβ when modeling a q( B) = β = β 1.0 λ<0 complex system, ρ α + β + λαβ belief α/ρ it’s an oversimplification λ=0 ∂q( A) probability to assume that the >0 β/ρ ∂α interdependency among ∂q( A) <0 λ>0 ∂β plausibility information sources is ∂q( A) linear <0 ∂λ q(A) 0 β/ρ α/ρ 1.02008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 25/30
    • Q-Filter Node and evidence accumulation for n-tap window and m-level signal S(t) s1 ... sn e(m-1)(t) m-1 s1 (m-1) sn (m-1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e(i)(t) i Ai q(Ai) . . . . . . . H(i,j) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + e(t) e(3)(t) 3 e(2)(t) 2 e(1)(t) 1 s1 (1) sn (1) f Processor λ2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 26/30
    • Q-Filter Computations N=5 Tap Case - Nonlinearity, Adaptivity, and Model Capacity h4 Signal Value h(xi) Aα h3 α h1 h2 h5 i ∏ (1 + λf xi ∈ A i ) −1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 Window Slotsq ( A) = , λ ≥ -1, λ ≠ 0 f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 ∏ (1 + λf xi ∈ X i ) −1 Density Generators q(Aα) λ Nonlinearity Controller q({x4, x3, x1, x2, x5})=1.0 q({x4, x3, x1, x2}) Total area is the Q-Filter output value q({x4, x3, x1}) q({x4, x3}) Adaptive Weight q({x4}) α q(Φ)=0.0 h5 h 2 h 1 h 3 h4 Threshold h5<h2< h1<h3< h4 Case2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 27/30
    • Kernel Structure and model capacities ξ00000 ξ10000 ξ01000 ξ00100 ξ00010 ξ00001 ξ11000 ξ10100 ξ10010 ξ10001 ξ01100 ξ01010 ξ01001 ξ00110 ξ00101 ξ00011 ξ11100 ξ11010 ξ11001 ξ10110 ξ10101 ξ10011 ξ01110 ξ01101 ξ01011 ξ00111 ξ11110 ξ11101 ξ11011 ξ10111 ξ01111 ξ11111 Lattice representation for a q-measure of size, n=5 ξ b , …, b = q({xj | bj=1, j=1, …n}) 1 n i.e. ξ00000 = q(Φ) and ξ01101 = q({x2,x3 ,x5})2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 28/30
    • Fast Q-Filter1. A fast method that replaces resorting (quadratic complexity for worst case) of moving window contents by deletions and insertions (linear complexity for worst case) when processing q-filter operations.2. Data structures to implement the method.3. Static memory allocation. h5 h5 f3 f2 f0 f4 f1 2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 29/30
    • Sample Execution 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Time Slot9 3 5 7 2 4 6 1 8 Time Series5 2 3 4 1 1-Index 4 1 5 2 3 2-Index 3 4 1 5 2 3-Index 5 2 3 4 1 4-Index 4 1 2 3 5 5-Index2008:06:11 Magdi A. Mohamed 30/30