Nike + i pod case
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Nike + i pod case

  • 2,960 views
Uploaded on

A presentation given in response to a Nike + iPod case/old exam paper ( yes, it was rather old)

A presentation given in response to a Nike + iPod case/old exam paper ( yes, it was rather old)

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
2,960
On Slideshare
2,960
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
56
Comments
0
Likes
1

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide
  • Jacob
  • Mads
  • Martin
  • Mads
  • Jacob
  • Martin

Transcript

  • 1. Case presented by Jacob, Martin & Mads
  • 2. Nike Apple A major player in the  Designs and markets clothing and sports consumer electronics, equipment industry computer software and Founded in 1964 as Blue personal computers Ribbon Sports  Founded in 1976 Nike sponsors a large number of high profile  Best known for the athletes and sports teams around the world Macintosh computer, iPod, iPhone and iPad Recognized by the “Just do it” slogan and Swoosh logoIntroductionQuestion 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion
  • 3.  The product:  The Nike + iPod kit measures and records the distance and pace of a walk or run, using a small chip embedded in a Nike shoe, which communicates with an iPod and other Apple software The scene:  Intelligent sportswear The case - Nike+ iPod:  Nike-Apple partnership  Strategic opportunities/pitfalls  Co-branding & decision-making process  Adidas-Samsung vs. Nike + iPodIntroductionQuestion 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion
  • 4. Conduct an analysis of the Nike-Apple partnership, including a discussion of the strategic opportunities (and possible pitfalls) this collaboration presents for each partner?IntroductionQuestion 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion
  • 5.  Both market leaders within their industry Mutual interests Same type of customers Brand synergy - both ways  Large joined customer base  75% of all runners already listen to music (Enclosure 2)  A Nike crisis affects Apple and vice versa ”The Nike/Apple co-branding ventures is successfulbecause of its undeniable ability to addvalue to eachother’sproducts, therebycreatingsomethinggreaterthan the sum of their parts.” - The Duffy Agency.IntroductionQuestion 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion
  • 6. S The Apple & Nike brands Innovative Market leaders Large loyal customer base W Product requirements High priced O Brand synergy Distribution channels Expansion of technology T Expansion of technology Potential harmful influencesIntroductionQuestion 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion
  • 7.  Strategic alliance  Product alliance  Promotional alliance Product development strategy (Ansoff) Horizontal diversification strategyIntroductionQuestion 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion
  • 8. Describe and discuss the consumer decision-making process inrelation to purchasing Nike+ shoes and iPod Sport Kit or Sensor. How does the co-branding influence the decision-making process?
  • 9. 2 types of Nike + iPod buyers: Dedicated and loyal customers  Members of the “Nike community”  “Apple-fans” Contemplating customersIntroductionQuestion 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion
  • 10. Need recognition & Problem awareness Information search Evaluation of alternatives Purchase Post-purchase evaluation “Five-stage model” Kotler, p. 246IntroductionQuestion 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion
  • 11.  The best of two strong brands Brand equity influence Collective pitfalls Loyal customer baseIntroductionQuestion 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion
  • 12. • Adidas and Samsung have developed a fitness concept, the “miCoach system” (Enclosures 3 and 4), which bears resemblance to the Nike + iPod system. • To which extent does the Adidas-Samsung partnership constitute a competitive threat to Nike and Apple? • How may Nike and Apple respond to this?
  • 13.  A differentiated oligopoly market Few major players  Nike-Apple, Adidas-Samsung, Garmin, Polar Nike-Apple the market leader Adidas-Samsung the market challenger  Segmental flank attack on Nike-Apple  Phone  Nike-Apple respond counter-offensive defence strategy (iPhone)IntroductionQuestion 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion
  • 14. 4 P’s  Difference in:  Price  Adidas: $ 300-600  Nike-iPod: $ 180-230  Product  No phone vs. Phone  Nike shoes exclusively vs. all brands  Adidas-Samsung: less music storage  Place  Adidas-Samsung only sold in EuropeIntroductionQuestion 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion
  • 15.  Operating within the same market  a threat Differences in the 4 P’s softens the threat Nike-Apple needs to keep an eye on the other market playersIntroductionQuestion 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion
  • 16.  Strategic opportunities and pitfalls  Brand synergy  Collective pitfalls Decision-making processes  Co-branding strengths  Shared brand equity Adidas-Samsung threat  Same scene, different product  Nike-Apple responseIntroductionQuestion 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion