ICA 2013: People, Place & Time: The Daily Rhythms of Deception in Text Messaging

  • 360 views
Uploaded on

Presented at ICA 2013 in London, UK on June 20, 2013 …

Presented at ICA 2013 in London, UK on June 20, 2013

Smith, M.E., Birnholtz, J., Reynolds, L., Hancock, J. (2013). People, Place and Time: The Daily Rhythms of Deception in Interpersonal Text Messaging. Presented at ICA (International Communication Association Annual Conference) 2013.

Full Paper: http://socialmedia.northwestern.edu/files/2013/04/android_ica2013_preprint.pdf

More in: Technology , Business
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
360
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. NorthwesternUniversityPeople, Place & TimeThe Daily Rhythms of Deception inInterpersonal Text MessagingCornellUniversityICA 2013London, UKLindsayReynoldsJeremyBirnholtzJeffHancockMadelineSmith
  • 2. 2Butler Lies• Often used to avoid socialinteraction or explain acommunication failure• Serve to maintainrelationships• Depend on norms andtechnological features• Exploit ambiguities inmediated communication
  • 3. People•Communication variesby relationship typesand closenessAgosto et al. 2012, Baym 2010•Mixed findings aboutwho people lie most toDePaulo & Kashy 1998, Cole 2001•Butler lies told tomaintain relationshipsReynolds et al. 2011, Birnholtz et al. 20133
  • 4. 4Who are lies and butler lies intext messaging told to?Research Question 1
  • 5. 5Time•Temporal contextaffects perceptionsGoffman 1966•Message timing caneffect relationshipsWalther and Tidwell 1995•People delay openingand respondingReynolds et al. 2011"clock" by azmichelle on flickr
  • 6. 6When are lies and butler lies intext messaging told?Research Question 2
  • 7. Place•Context important forinterpreting messages•Location sharing appsincreasingly popularZickuhr 2012•Decreased ambiguitythreatens butler lyingBirnholtz et al. 2010, Reynolds et al. 20137
  • 8. 8How does location sharing affectbutler lying in text messaging?Research Question 3
  • 9. 9Method: Butler Messaging App
  • 10. Study Procedure1. Pre-study online materials• Online consent form• Deception Tutorial• Download and install app2. Use app for one week• Email reminder mid-week3. Post-study questionnaire• Message logs with questions• Experience with app• Uninstall and debrief10
  • 11. Data and Coding•3,963 sent messages•959 butler messages (24.2%)•230 deceptive messages (5.8%)•89 butler lies (2.2%)11see#you#at#7:15#I"did"not"like"her"shirt"
  • 12. RQ1: Relationships•F(4,560.7) = 31.48, p<.001•More messages sent to romantic partners than allother categories (p<.001)120"5"10"15"20"25"30"35"Acquaintance" Friend" Family" Roman8c" Other"PercentofTextMessagesRela2onshipTypesMeanNumberofTextMessagesSentperRecipient
  • 13. RQ1: Relationships & Lying•F(4,566.3)=1.05, p=.380•No significant differences in rates of lying byrelationship type130"3"6"9"12"15"Acquaintance" Friend" Family" Roman:c" Other"PercentofTextMessagesRela2onshipTypesPercentLiesperRecipient
  • 14. RQ1: Relationships & Butler Lying140"2"4"6"8"10"Acquaintance" Friend" Family" Roman9c" Other"PercentofTextMessagesRela2onshipTypesPercentButlerLiesperRecipient•F(4,568.5)=1.44, p=.219•No differences in butler lying rates by relationshiptype
  • 15. RQ2:Time & Lying15
  • 16. RQ2:Time & Butler Lying16
  • 17. RQ3: Locations & Butler Lying17
  • 18. RQ3: Locations & Butler Lying18•χ2(1, N=3340) = 6.83, p<.01•Locations shared with butler lies less frequentlythan with other messages
  • 19. Summary of Results•More text messages sent to romantic partnerthan other types of contacts•Failed to find difference and lying and butler lyingto different types of contacts•Butler lies sent at times of social coordination•Butler lies were sent without locations moreoften than other messages19
  • 20. Discussion•Context matters: people, place and time•New technological features can impact behavior•Need more detailed studies of text messaging•Butler Messaging app20
  • 21. Limitations & Future Work•Self-reports of deception•Potential self-selection bias•Modified app included unfamiliar features•Student sample21
  • 22. 22We thank Jon Culver, Daniel Haber, Jared Kass, Kate Pascucci, Weili Shi,Mark Thomas and Jin Zhao for their valuable research assistance. Fundingwas partially provided by NSF Grants IIS-0915081 and DGE-0824162.People, Place & TimeThe Daily Rhythms of Deception in Interpersonal Text MessagingLindsayReynoldsJeremyBirnholtzJeffHancockMadelineSmithsocialmedia.northwestern.edu sml.comm.cornell.edu