Michael De Percy Feedback Summary 2004-2009

374
-1

Published on

My teaching feedback collected during the period 2004-2009 at the University of Canberra.

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
374
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Michael De Percy Feedback Summary 2004-2009

  1. 1. Year Sem Unit Role Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Questions 2004 2 IP Tutor 5.8 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.7 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.1 4.0 4.0 4.2 1.  All things considered, how would you rate the teaching of this lecturer in this unit? 2005 1 SM Tutor 7.0 4.8 4.8 5.0 4.8 5.0 4.4 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.4 4.2 2.  The lecturer made the objectives clear for each session. 4.6 2005 1 GBR Tutor 6.1 4.8 4.7 4.8 4.4 4.7 4.5 4.7 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.5 3.  The lecturer was able to explain concepts clearly. 2005 1 PDN Tutor 6.0 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.4 4.0 4.6 4.1 3.9 3.7 4.3 4.4 4.1 4.2 4.  The lecturer seemed well prepared for each session. 2005 2 GBR Both 5.5 3.9 4.0 4.3 3.9 4.3 3.9 4.3 3.7 3.3 3.4 4.0 3.9 3.7 3.9 5.  The lecturer taught the unit matter in a way that helped me understand it. 2006 1 GBR Lecturer 5.3 4.0 3.9 4.4 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.3 3.8 3.9 3.6 3.9 4.0 3.6 3.6 6.  The lecturer tried to make the unit interesting. 2006 2 LIC Lecturer 5.8 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.4 4.0 4.4 3.8 4.1 4.0 4.3 4.2 4.1 7.  The lecturer demonstrated the relevance of the unit to the whole course. 3.9 2007 1 GBR Lecturer 6.0 5.8 5.7 6.3 5.4 5.9 5.5 5.2 5.7 5.5 5.2 5.7 5.7 5.3 5.0 8.  The lecturer made opportunities to ask questions. 2007 2 LIC Lecturer 5.9 5.7 5.8 6.0 5.7 6.1 5.5 5.5 5.2 5.4 4.8 5.5 5.5 5.2 5.6 9.  The lecturer was available for consultation. 2008 1 GBR Lecturer 5.8 5.7 5.6 6.1 5.6 6.3 5.5 5.3 5.1 5.5 5.0 5.6 5.7 5.5 4.6 10.   The lecturer made clear the criteria used to assess student work. 2008 2 LIC Lecturer 5.9 5.8 5.9 6.0 5.8 6.1 5.7 5.7 5.5 5.7 5.3 5.7 5.6 5.4 5.5 11. The lecturer gave adequate feedback on assignments and other prescribed work. 2009 1 GBR Lecturer 5.9 6.0 5.8 6.4 5.4 5.9 5.5 5.0 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.8 5.7 5.3 12.   The unit covered what the unit description said it would. 5.5 Legend: 13.   Assessment tasks set and/or exams were related to unit goals. IP = International Politics LIC = Leadership, Innovation & Change 14.   Assessment tasks allowed me to demonstrate what I had learnt. SM = Strategic Management The role of 'Tutor' does not include responsibility for curriculum design 15.   The workload was comparable to other units at this level. PDN = Politics of Developing Nations The role of 'Lecturer' includes full responsibilties for convening the unit GBR= Government-Business Relations NOTE: This record is a complete history of my teaching feedback @UC Graph 1: Longitudinal Feedback Summary 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 Result out of 7 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Column E Column F Column G Column H Column I Column J Column K Column L Column M Column N Column O Column P Column Q Column R Column S Question Number Row 2 Row 3 Row 4 Row 5 Row 6 Row 7 Row 8 Row 8 Row 10 Row 11 Row 12 Row 13
  2. 2. ongitudinal Feedback Summary Column K Column L Column M Column N Column O Column P Column Q Column R Column S Question Number 6 Row 7 Row 8 Row 8 Row 10 Row 11 Row 12 Row 13

×