• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Michael De Percy Feedback Summary 2004-2009
 

Michael De Percy Feedback Summary 2004-2009

on

  • 572 views

My teaching feedback collected during the period 2004-2009 at the University of Canberra.

My teaching feedback collected during the period 2004-2009 at the University of Canberra.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
572
Views on SlideShare
556
Embed Views
16

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

2 Embeds 16

http://madepercy.blogspot.com 10
http://www.politicalscience.com.au 6

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Michael De Percy Feedback Summary 2004-2009 Michael De Percy Feedback Summary 2004-2009 Presentation Transcript

    • Year Sem Unit Role Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Questions 2004 2 IP Tutor 5.8 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.7 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.1 4.0 4.0 4.2 1.  All things considered, how would you rate the teaching of this lecturer in this unit? 2005 1 SM Tutor 7.0 4.8 4.8 5.0 4.8 5.0 4.4 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.4 4.2 2.  The lecturer made the objectives clear for each session. 4.6 2005 1 GBR Tutor 6.1 4.8 4.7 4.8 4.4 4.7 4.5 4.7 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.5 3.  The lecturer was able to explain concepts clearly. 2005 1 PDN Tutor 6.0 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.4 4.0 4.6 4.1 3.9 3.7 4.3 4.4 4.1 4.2 4.  The lecturer seemed well prepared for each session. 2005 2 GBR Both 5.5 3.9 4.0 4.3 3.9 4.3 3.9 4.3 3.7 3.3 3.4 4.0 3.9 3.7 3.9 5.  The lecturer taught the unit matter in a way that helped me understand it. 2006 1 GBR Lecturer 5.3 4.0 3.9 4.4 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.3 3.8 3.9 3.6 3.9 4.0 3.6 3.6 6.  The lecturer tried to make the unit interesting. 2006 2 LIC Lecturer 5.8 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.4 4.0 4.4 3.8 4.1 4.0 4.3 4.2 4.1 7.  The lecturer demonstrated the relevance of the unit to the whole course. 3.9 2007 1 GBR Lecturer 6.0 5.8 5.7 6.3 5.4 5.9 5.5 5.2 5.7 5.5 5.2 5.7 5.7 5.3 5.0 8.  The lecturer made opportunities to ask questions. 2007 2 LIC Lecturer 5.9 5.7 5.8 6.0 5.7 6.1 5.5 5.5 5.2 5.4 4.8 5.5 5.5 5.2 5.6 9.  The lecturer was available for consultation. 2008 1 GBR Lecturer 5.8 5.7 5.6 6.1 5.6 6.3 5.5 5.3 5.1 5.5 5.0 5.6 5.7 5.5 4.6 10.   The lecturer made clear the criteria used to assess student work. 2008 2 LIC Lecturer 5.9 5.8 5.9 6.0 5.8 6.1 5.7 5.7 5.5 5.7 5.3 5.7 5.6 5.4 5.5 11. The lecturer gave adequate feedback on assignments and other prescribed work. 2009 1 GBR Lecturer 5.9 6.0 5.8 6.4 5.4 5.9 5.5 5.0 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.8 5.7 5.3 12.   The unit covered what the unit description said it would. 5.5 Legend: 13.   Assessment tasks set and/or exams were related to unit goals. IP = International Politics LIC = Leadership, Innovation & Change 14.   Assessment tasks allowed me to demonstrate what I had learnt. SM = Strategic Management The role of 'Tutor' does not include responsibility for curriculum design 15.   The workload was comparable to other units at this level. PDN = Politics of Developing Nations The role of 'Lecturer' includes full responsibilties for convening the unit GBR= Government-Business Relations NOTE: This record is a complete history of my teaching feedback @UC Graph 1: Longitudinal Feedback Summary 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 Result out of 7 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Column E Column F Column G Column H Column I Column J Column K Column L Column M Column N Column O Column P Column Q Column R Column S Question Number Row 2 Row 3 Row 4 Row 5 Row 6 Row 7 Row 8 Row 8 Row 10 Row 11 Row 12 Row 13
    • ongitudinal Feedback Summary Column K Column L Column M Column N Column O Column P Column Q Column R Column S Question Number 6 Row 7 Row 8 Row 8 Row 10 Row 11 Row 12 Row 13