EXT 504 - Low Cost Leadership (Porter)
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

EXT 504 - Low Cost Leadership (Porter)

on

  • 3,741 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
3,741
Views on SlideShare
3,741
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
50
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

EXT 504 - Low Cost Leadership (Porter) EXT 504 - Low Cost Leadership (Porter) Presentation Transcript

  • EXT 504
    Joanna Wiebe
    (Summary of Paper on Porter)
    Low Cost Leadership (Porter)
  • The critical focus in successfully implementing a cost-
    leadership strategy is on efficiency and cost reduction.
  • Overview
    Cost-leadership strategies are all about standardized products (no differentiation) with cost/price as the key differentiator.
    Understand cost-reduction strategies (e.g., building efficient-scale facilities) and emphasize maintaining constant efforts (or, as Porter would say, activities) to keep costs low in order to create value for customers
    “Companies following cost leadership strategies cannot completely ignore sources of differentiation that customers value when producing standardised products. These include styling, minimal levels of service, and product quality” (Porter)
  • Negatives of Low-Cost Leadership Strategy
    Risks with cost-leadership strategy:
    Tech innovations by competitors eliminate low-cost advantage
    Too much focus on process efficiency = less awareness on environment & shifting customer preferences
    Competitor imitation of low-cost + better value in other areas
    When competitors imitate (successfully), low-cost strategy must shift to increase value to customers
    Customer resistance to corresponding price increases
  • What Types of Companies Might Choose a Cost-Leadership Strategy?
    • Offer relatively standardized products
    • Have a minimum level of differentiation
    • Have a customer base that is price-sensitive
    • Have a willingness to lower their costs versus their competitors
  • What Are Some Cost-Reduction Strategies?
    • Building efficient-scale facilities
    • Establishing tight control over production
    • Establishing tight control over overhead costs
    • Minimizing the costs of:
    • Sales
    • Product research and development (R&D)
    • Service
    • Investing in state-of-the-art manufacturing technologies… that save $$$ down the road
  • A company that successfully implements a cost-leadership strategy can earn above-average returns even with strong competitive forces.
  • Porter’s 5 Competitive Forces
    Rivalry with existing competitors
    Bargaining power of buyers/customers
    Bargaining power of suppliers
    Potential new entrants
    Product substitutes
  • Rivalry with Existing Competitors
    “Achieving the lowest cost position means that a company's competitors will hesitate to compete on the basis of price because, in the event of a price war, the low cost company will continue to earn profits after its competitors compete away their profits.”
  • Bargaining Power of Buyers/Customers
    “Achieving the low cost position provides some protection against powerful customers who attempt to drive down prices. If customers attempt to drive prices below the cost of the next most efficient company, that company might choose to exit the market (rather than remain and earn below average profits), leaving the low cost company with a monopoly position. If that happens, customers would lose any bargaining power, as the monopoly company would be in a position to raise prices.”
  • Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    “Because they have achieved the lowest cost position in the industry, the cost leadership strategy enables a company to absorb a greater amount of cost increases from powerful suppliers before it must raise prices charged to customers. This may enable the company to be alone among its competitors in earning above-average returns. In addition, a low-cost leader that also has a dominant market share may be in a position to force suppliers to lower prices or to hold down the level of price increases, and thus reduce the power of suppliers.”
  • Potential New Entrants
    “Companies successfully following cost leadership strategies generally must produce and sell in large volumes to earn above-average returns. And, with a continuous focus on efficiency and reducing costs, low-cost leadership companies create barriers to entry. New entrants must either enter the industry at a large scale (large enough to achieve the same economies of scale as the next lowest cost company) or be satisfied with average profits until they move sufficiently far down the experience curve to match the efficiencies of the low-cost leader.”
  • Product Substitutes
    “The low-cost leader is in a more attractive position relative to substitute products than are other companies in the industry. To retain customers, the low-cost leader can more easily reduce prices to maintain the price-value relationship and retain customers.”
  • Examples Today…
    Low-Cost Leader
    …And Not