• Save
Tablets and Television - How tablet PC's will impact the Nature of Television Production
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Tablets and Television - How tablet PC's will impact the Nature of Television Production

on

  • 1,456 views

Talk by Maarten Verwaest at the EBU Broadthinking Conference in Geneva.

Talk by Maarten Verwaest at the EBU Broadthinking Conference in Geneva.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,456
Views on SlideShare
1,159
Embed Views
297

Actions

Likes
3
Downloads
0
Comments
0

4 Embeds 297

http://www.limecraft.com 222
http://limecraft.com 72
http://www.linkedin.com 2
https://www.linkedin.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • 1998

Tablets and Television - How tablet PC's will impact the Nature of Television Production Tablets and Television - How tablet PC's will impact the Nature of Television Production Presentation Transcript

  • Television and Tablets How Tablets will impact the Nature of Television Production
  • Limecraft
    Limecraftis a media technology startup. We provide software and services to the audiovisual professional.
    • Facts
    • Incorporated May 2010
    • Spin-off of Ghent University, IBBT and VRT
    • Team of top experts
    • Software and Services for the Audiovisual Professional
    • Production Facilities
    • Broadcasting
    • Telecom
    • http://www.limecraft.com
  • Example – enable live flash-encoded content on iPad
    Problem – Cupertino doesn’t like adult entertainment on iPad
    Objective – Enable live services on iPad
    • Transcoding of Flash/VP6 into iPAd Quicktime (H.264/AAC)
    • Real-time processing of live content - delay of 5 seconds
    • 800 kbps to 500 kbps with a increased image quality(!)
    • Variable bitrate encoding
  • Example – Telenet Yelo (Over the Top Television)
    Courtesy of Telenet NV
    Objective – Integratelive TV and Video on Demand
    • The EPG enables access to live and on demand broadcast services
    • Ffmpeg/x.264 transcoding @800 kbps enables excellent quality
    • A adequate DRM system(!) for protection of content against unauthorised reproduction or retransmission
  • Provisional Conclusion
    Tablets and Television
    • Tablets are easy enough and enable a quality which is good enough for competing with conventional television services
    • Distribution of television signals to tables is uniquely via IP, and preferably using some form of adaptive bitrate streaming
    • Transport via IP has the potential to brutally replace DVB.
    But:
    • we need a standard file/streaming/metadata –format
    • we need a standard transport protocol
    • we need a different production process !!!
  • A tablet personal computer (tablet PC) is a portable personal computer equipped with a touch screen as a primary input device and designed to be operated and owned by an individual.[2]
    (Source: www.wikipedia.com)
  • January 27th, 2010 – “You’ve got the internet in your hands...”
    Apple released the first iPad in April 2010, and sold 3 million devices in 80 days.
    By now, more than 16 million iPads have been sold — more than all other tablet PCs combined.
  • Why now and why it will work this time...
    Technology
    • Solid State Storage
    • Wireless Internet
    • High-res LED displays
    • Multi-touch Human Computing Interface
    And
    • Business Model !!!
    • Rights Protection !!!
  • Use Cases
    Second Screen
    • Nielssen
    • VRT-medialab
    • Boxee
    Primary Media Player
    • iPlayer, Hulu (Broadcast content, catchup)
    • Netflix, Yelo (Premium content, pay per view)
    • deredactie.be
  • Typical Architecture
    Rundown Mgnt System
    (iNews/ENPS)
    Broadcast Automation System
    (SGT, Pro-bel, Miranda)
    Playout Server
    (Omneon/EVS/Nagravision)
    MAM system
    (VizRT Ardome / Avid Blue Order)
    Web Content Mgnt System
    (Drupall/Polopoly/Escenic)
    Webservers
    In the best case scenario, the production facility or broadcaster is using a central Media Asset Management system.
    Beyond that, each distribution channel will require dedicated encoders, additional content management systems and often manual editing. All of this leads to substantial CAPEX and OPEX.
    Streaming Server Farm
    (CDN)
    Video Encoders
    (Telestream/Agility)
  • The Cause of the Problem it the Marketplace
    The marketplace is extremely fragmented, which makes it difficult for a production facility or a broadcaster to set up an integrated and cost effective solution.
  • Provisional Conclusion (2)
    1/ Current television and film production best practices are optimised for linear television and are not (yet) adapted for non-linear distribution of content.
    2/ The technology required to extend conventional production by alternative distribution channels is quite new and in evolution.
    3/ As such, re-use of content often results in:
    • Disproportional cost
    • Poor image quality
    • Lousy user experience
  • Issue N°1 - Cost
    Acording to information publishished via the Freedom of Information act, BBC would have spent 23.2 M£ (~26.5M$) from 2005 to 2010 on the development of BBC iPlayer, excl. commercial software licenses.
    The operational cost is 3.9M£ (~4.5M$) per year, primarily technology-related and excluding distribution cost.
    BBC iPlayer broke records in January 2011, receiving 162 million requests for TV and radio programmes on an average of 4.4 million daily, marking an increase across all devices, all to the highest recorded figures to date.
  • Issue N°2 - Poor video quality
    While the current “best practices” in terms of videocompression may be sufficient for talking heads, they show very low tolerance to moving or complex images.
    -> Encoding for over the top distribution requires extremely variable bitrate encoding and large GOP sizes.
  • Issue N°3 - Lousy user exp
    Current “best practices” result in a televion programme which will be scheduled for linear distribution. It is difficult or impossible to automatically enable item-based viewing and no metadata is available to enable interactive search and retrieval of items.
    -> The next generation of content production systems needs support for model-driven development, resulting in custumisable and automatically re-produced versions of the master
  • Step 1 – Same Content, same usage
    Courtesy of Telenet NV
  • Step 2 – Same Content, new Usage
    Courtesy of Telenet NV
  • Step 3 – Explore new Formats
    Non-linear television will be chapterised, include search functionality and provides carefully selected links to related content and advertisement
  • Challenges
    Tabletswilleventuallylead to new user experiences and formats, but currentproduction and distribution methodsare not sophisticatedenough:
    • File formats – a common data model and embeddedmetadataare the key to interoperability;
    • A new type of IntegratedAsset Management system must provide native support for 360° distribution – additional distribution channels are available at marginal cost;
    • New production methodsbased on model-drivendevelopment are the key to production automation, customisableproducts and interactivity;
    24
  • MXF – the production file format
    Objective –Robust and Simple
    • reduce 95% of the interactions to simple file transfer
    • Integration based on embedded metadata
    • MXF-DMS1 is the prefered option
    • Current commercial software is highly inefficient(!)
  • Production
    (Storytelling, capturing, editing)
    Packaging and Labelling
    (Master Control)
    Distribution
    (Broadcast transmission, streaming servers)
    Playout and Interaction
    (Television, Tablet Device, Browser)
    Adobe
    Apple
    Microsoft Google
    HTML5
    Master Control
    API’s
    Script, Breakdown
    H.264, AAC, embedded metadata
    VP8 (Google) – H.264, AAC (Mpeg)
    MXF (SMPTE)
    Matroska, m3u8
    RTSP – Mpeg2TS – Mpeg Dash
    Mpeg2TS
    NTP - RTP - HTTP
    FTP
    But, quid with the distribution format???
  • Integrated Asset Mgnt/Master Control
  • New Production Methods – Step 1
  • A glance at the future…
    Check out the trailer on Youtube:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lx39IHUZyA4
    29
  • http://www.limecraft.com
    http://twitter.com/limecraft
    maarten.verwaest@limecraft.com