Presentation of Scoop @Ebu Production Technology Seminar

1,013 views
936 views

Published on

Discussion on future technology for television production on the EBU Production Technology Seminar by Maarten Verwaest.

(Geneva - 2009, January 27th)

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,013
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
5
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
34
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Presentation of Scoop @Ebu Production Technology Seminar

  1. 1. Future Television Production – Proof of Concept<br />PISA - Production, Indexing and Search of AudiovisualMaterial<br />
  2. 2. 2<br />PISA - Positioning<br />VRT-Medialab (medialab.vrt.be) - technical R&D<br />IBBT (www.ibbt.be) – InterdisciplinaryResearch Institute<br />PISA – Research Project on Production and Indexing of Audiovisual Media<br />30 Man-year<br />VideoSearchTechnology<br />UnsupervisedFeature Extraction<br />Computer AssistedManufacturing<br />
  3. 3. 3<br />Digital Media Production<br />Client<br />(local file system<br />+ I/O stack)<br />IP network<br />(SUPERNET II)<br />GPFS<br />File system<br />Cluster node<br />FC network<br />(SAN)<br />Storage<br />controller<br />(DS4500)<br />FC-AL loops<br />(disk connection<br />network)<br />Hard<br />disk<br />Suprastructure – Metadata Mgnt<br />Production and distribution<br />Editing<br />Mastering<br />Media Asset Mgnt<br />Ingest<br />Playout<br />Infrastructure - Networks and Storage<br />Production Platform<br />
  4. 4. 4<br />Digital Media Production<br />Suprastructure – Metadata Mgnt<br />Production and distribution<br />Production and distribution<br />Editing<br />Mastering<br />Media Asset Mgnt<br />Ingest<br />Playout<br />Infrastructure - Networks and Storage<br />Production Platform<br />
  5. 5. 5<br />Product Engineering<br />Suprastructure – Metadata Mgnt<br />Production and distribution<br />Infrastructure - Networks and Storage<br />Production Platform<br />
  6. 6. 6<br />Meta<br />Data<br />Meta<br />Data<br />Data<br />Video<br />Audio<br />Digital Media Distribution<br />Communication<br />(Information)<br />Suprastructure – Metadata Mgnt<br />Production and distribution<br />Broadcast via DVB, <br />DSL or Cable<br />Infrastructure - Networks and Storage<br />Production Platform<br />Distribution Platform<br />
  7. 7. Digital Asset Management, Content Management…<br />The NEXT<br />MAM SYSTEM<br />
  8. 8. 8<br />
  9. 9. 9<br />User Expectations<br /><ul><li>“Configurable” Content
  10. 10. Scalable content served by multiple distribution channels
  11. 11. Hybrid formats complementaryusing multiple distribution channels
  12. 12. Value added applications (EPG, Favorites, MyChannel,…) relie on variousmetadata sources
  13. 13. Online offeringischaracterised by personalisation</li></li></ul><li>10<br />
  14. 14. Future television Production – Solution Space<br /><ul><li>Assessements
  15. 15. Concurrent Engineering (Collaborative production) increases productivity
  16. 16. Modular production apparatus enables a configurable product
  17. 17. A Digital Supply Chain Manager should ensure overall consistency and performance
  18. 18. Individual Media Asset Management systems don’t match this requirement
  19. 19. Ad hoc plumbing (“best of breed”) compromises stability and quality of the product</li></ul>Supply Chain Engine<br />More, better and structuredmetadatawillenable an evolutionfrombare application integration to information integration and supplychain optimisation.<br />11<br />
  20. 20. SOA - Some Overstretched Assumptions<br /><ul><li>An SOA may “provide the ability to manage the complexity” but it usually increases it;
  21. 21. It is not true that an “ESB should replace all application specific interfaces by an general purpose abstract interface”. It should implement some major interfaces without further custom development (NewsML-G2, TVAnytime, Mpeg7,…);
  22. 22. It is assumed that “the SOA and the ESB simplify your service portfolio” (e.g. a single video transcoder), but this may lead to massive overconsumption of IT infrastructure(!);
  23. 23. A Service Oriented Architecture is only part of the solution:
  24. 24. Stability and performance
  25. 25. Intellectual Property Management
  26. 26. Routing and resource scheduling
  27. 27. …</li></ul>Supply Chain Engine<br />More, better and structuredmetadatawillenable an evolutionfrombare application integration to information integration and supplychain optimisation.<br />12<br />
  28. 28. 13<br />Use Cases - Logging, Disclosure, Annotation,…<br />archiefnummer : ALG 20010813 1<br />fragmentnummer : 1 <br />reeks : 1000 ZONNEN EN GARNALEN<br />bandnummer : E03024404<br />formaat : DBCM<br />fragmenttitel : 1000 ZONNEN & GARNALEN<br />beeld : KL/PALPLUS<br />fragmentduur : 18 20 <br />tekst : 0&apos;00&quot; TOERISTISCH REPORTAGEMAGAZINE OVERZICHT <br /> ONDERWERPEN GENERIEK TOERISTISCH REPORTAGEMAGAZINE, <br /> OVERZICHT ONDERWERPEN <br /> 0&apos;50&quot; VANDAAG : KUNSTENAAR LUC HOFKENS ONTWIERP EEN OASE <br /> OP ZIJN DAKTERRAS IN BORGERHOUT DIE DOET DENKEN AAN DE <br /> GRAND CANYON INTERVIEW MET LUC EN ZIJN VROUW <br /> MARILOU BUITENBEELD DAK MET OMGEVING BUITENKANT <br /> ARBEIDERSWONING, PANO OVER ROTSWANDEN, KRATEN MET WATER, <br /> BEPANTING, FOTOALBUM MET VERLOOP WERKEN <br /> 4&apos;00&quot; JUNIOR : KLAARTJE ALAERTS, 13 JAAR WIL ASTRONAUTEN <br /> WORDEN ZE BEZOEKT HETEUROSPACE CENTER METRUIMTEVEREN, <br /> RAKETTEN SIMULATIE IN RUIMTEVEER, INTERVIEW, HEEFT EEN <br /> UFO GEZIEN MAAKT ZELF KLEIN RAKETJE, SCHIET HET AF <br /> 7&apos;50&quot; DE SCHEURKALENDER : ARCHIEF RECLAMEFILM IBM <br /> INTERVIEW MAURICE DE WILDE, EERSTE PERSOONLIJKECOMPUTER <br />trefwoorden : BELGIE; BORGERHOUT; ARTIEST; OASE; KUNST; GRAND<br /> CANYON (NATUURGEBIED); DAK; TERRAS; INTERVIEW; EURO<br /> SPACE CENTER; RUIMTEVAART; PC; BOOTTOCHT; RIJKDOM; <br /> PASSAGIER; GASTRONOMIE; RESTAURANT; PERSONEEL; <br /> VAKANTIE; BINNENBEELD; SCHIP; BECKERS LEEN; VRT; <br /> LOTTO; RADIOOMROEPSTER; KLANKSTUDIO; UITVINDING; <br /> BARBECUE; BETONMOLEN; IBM; RECLAMESPOT<br />rechthebbende : VRT<br />Opzoekscherm FILM Set: 16 Aantal: 1<br />blz 1 van 3<br /> trefwoorden: ibm and vrt <br /> archiefnummer: - <br /> uitzendjaar: maand: dag: <br /> fragmentnummer: fragmentduur: <br /> reeks: <br /> formaat: bandnummer: <br /> aflevering: afleveringsnummer: <br /> programma: uitzenddatum: <br /> fragmenttitel: <br /> tekst: <br /> kategorie: <br /> opnamedatum: opnamenummer: <br /> journalist: rechthebbende: <br /> SETS <br />The strings required for the operation are not defined <br /> F11 F12 F13 F14 F17 F18 F19 F20 Ent <br />Eindigen Sets Refset Toon Vorige Volg/Leeg Thesaurus Commando Opzoeken <br />
  29. 29. 14<br />Proof of Concept - The SearchEngine for Video<br />Search Client<br />(Custom Development)<br /><ul><li>Searchfederation by harvesting and source integration
  30. 30. Integrated application of keywords and properties
  31. 31. Intuitive and structuredpresentation of results
  32. 32. Time-codedproperties and indexing
  33. 33. Integration of variousfeature extraction algorithms</li></ul>Legacy Video Library<br />NewsML-G2<br />Raw Material<br />(Reuters and EBU)<br />Media Asset Management System<br />(Ardome)<br />Search Engine<br />(Lucene/SOLR)<br />Production Systems<br />(Studio, craft editing,…)<br />
  34. 34. 15<br />Shot Segmentation and Scene Recognition<br />
  35. 35. 16<br />Computer Assisted Analysis<br />
  36. 36. 17<br />Proof of Concept - Computer AssistedAnnotation<br />
  37. 37. 18<br />Proof of Concept - The SearchEngine<br />
  38. 38. 19<br />Future - From« Metadata » to CAD/CAM<br />?<br />
  39. 39. Challenge – Human-Computer Interface<br />
  40. 40. 21<br />Proof of Concept – Model Driven Development<br />Demo<br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lx39IHUZyA4<br />
  41. 41. 22<br />Conclusions<br /><ul><li>User Expectations
  42. 42. The notion of a configurable productenableshybrid formats and personalisation
  43. 43. Theserequire concurrent engineering and(!) collaborative production
  44. 44. Value added services for the consumer relie on more and bettermetadata as well
  45. 45. State-of-the-Art
  46. 46. The lack of metadataunderstandinginhibits collaborative production
  47. 47. MAM Systems as such are not scalable in terms of implementing new services
  48. 48. « Best-of-breed » approach has lead to plumber’s architecture
  49. 49. Conclusions
  50. 50. Collaborative production willbe a processimplemented by a distributedenvironment of equal and collaborative components;
  51. 51. NextgenerationMedia Asset Management willbebased on information integration as opposed to application integration and the result of consistent and sound system engineering;
  52. 52. Whilesemantic technologies (web 3.0) may help to harvestunstructured information and to processnaturallanguage-based sources, model-drivendevelopment and structuredmeta-data are a criticalsucces factor for successfullydeployingComputer IntegratedManufacturing.</li></li></ul><li>23<br />http://medialab.vrt.be/pisa<br />http://projects.ibbt.be/pisa<br />maarten.verwaest@limecraft.com<br />

×