New Intro to Engineering Courses

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Favorite & 1 Event

    New Intro to Engineering Courses - Presentation Transcript

    1. Attracting & Retaining Engineering Students-A New Approach Larry Wear [email_address] . washington . edu Professor & Associate Director Institute of Technology University of Washington Tacoma Orlando Baiocchi [email_address] Professor & Director Institute of Technology University of Washington Tacoma
    2. A well known problem
      • http://www.virtualpet.com/engineer/retent/retent.htm
      • First Term Probation: Models for Identifying High Risk Students. 30th ASEE/ IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 2000. Focuses on freshmen students, however several of the concepts might also apply to upperclassmen. FRESHMEN.
      • Thinking Inside of the Box: Retention of Women in Engineering. 30th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 2000. Describes efforts at Penn State to increase retention of women.
      • Engineering Retention: National and Institutional Perspectives. Proceedings, 1988 ASEE Annual Conference. ASEE, 1988. Pgs. 843-851. By W.K. LeBold and S.K. Ward. 1988.
      • Developing a Six Sigma Methodology for Improving Retention in Engineering Education. Keith Hargrove and Legand Burge. ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Article focuses 6 sigma techniques on retaining minority engineering students. Attrition variables are seen as "defects".
      • Student Retention Strategies Gender Clustering. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Washington, D.C., Jun. 1996. Virginia Polytech has voluntarily clustered its Intro to Engineering class sections by gender to allow females to form friendships with other females. FRESHMEN.
      • Identifying Factors Influencing Engineering Student Graduation and Retention: A Longitudinal and Cross-Institutional Study. Proceedings. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Montreal, Quebec, Jun. 2002. Compares effectiveness of active, cooperative learning environment v. traditional teaching methods.
      • Systems Model for Improving Standards and Retention in Engineering Education. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Albuquerque, NM, Jun. 2001. A four-step procedure is proposed by a professor at Florida A&M / Florida State: problem diagnosis, evaluation and analysis, system model design, and design implementation.
      • Women in Engineering at North Carolina State University: An Effort in Recruitment, Retention and Encouragement. Proceedings 29th ASEE / IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Juan, PR, Nov. 1999.
    3. Previous Approaches
      • Freshmen Introductory Classes
        • Introduction to design
        • Fun & games classes
      • Course Sequencing
      • Help classes for engineering & math
      • Special classes- robots, team projects
      • other
    4. UWT Computer Engineering Approach
      • Three-quarter sequence
        • 1 unit/quarter
        • 2 hrs/week
        • Required for freshmen
    5. 1st Quarter Course Syllabus
      • 2 weeks- overview of product development life-cycle
      • 2 weeks- Lego MindStorm introduction
      • 2 weeks- Logic design with Logic Works
      • 2 weeks- Lego contest
      • 2 weeks- Analog design with Pspice, introduction to project teams
    6. 2nd Quarter Course Syllabus
      • Team formulation
      • Team training and inspection process
      • Project concept document review & inspection
      • Project requirements document review & inspection
      • Project design documents review & inspection
      • Project status presentations
    7. 3rd Quarter Course Syllabus
      • Test Plan review & inspection
      • Parts locator
      • Assembler
      • Unit testing
      • System testing
      • Status reports
    8. Observation from TCES 101
      • All students liked the Legos project
      • Some liked the competition aspect
      • Most wanted more lab time
        • Use of equipment
        • Use of simulation software
      • High student evaluation
    9. Observation from TCES 102
      • Liked being part of a team
      • Didn’t like all the paperwork
      • Wanted to know more so they could understand and contribute more
    10. Conclusions
      • More lab time in 101
      • Assign teams early in 102
      • Introduce simple lab project in 102 with tutoring by seniors
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Larry WearLarry Wear Nominate

    custom

    382 views, 1 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Putting freshmen on senior capstone project teams.

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 382
      • 382 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 8
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Groups / Events