• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
4NA 2008 practice
 

4NA 2008 practice

on

  • 312 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
312
Views on SlideShare
312
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    4NA 2008 practice 4NA 2008 practice Presentation Transcript

    • SBCSQ Practice Self-marking and evaluation 2008 Paper
    • Qns 1 (b)
    • Are you surprised by what this source says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster? EYA.
    • Are you surprised by what this source says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster? EYA.
    • Are you surprised by what this source says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster? EYA. What's the logic for being surprised?
    • What I know/expect Info from Ms Kay Poh
    • What I know/expect Info from Ms Kay Poh Mr Luo is tall Mr Luo is tall
    • What I know/expect Info from Ms Kay Poh Mr Luo is tall Mr Luo is tallsupports
    • What I know/expect Info from Ms Kay Poh Mr Luo is tall Mr Luo is tallsupports I'm not surprised by what Ms Kay Poh said. It supports what I already know!
    • What I know/expect Info from Ms Kay Poh Mr Luo is tall Mr Luo is actually very short
    • What I know/expect Info from Ms Kay Poh Mr Luo is tall Mr Luo is actually very shortdoes not support
    • What I know/expect Info from Ms Kay Poh Mr Luo is tall Mr Luo is actually very shortdoes not support THAT'S SHOCKING NEWS!!!YES I'M SURPRISE!!
    • Are you surprised by what this source says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster? EYA. What's the logic for being surprised?
    • Are you surprised by what this source says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster? EYA. What's the logic for being surprised? We are surprised when it does not support our expectations
    • Are you surprised by what this source says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster? EYA. How will you expect the SL government to react to the tsunami disaster?
    • Are you surprised by what this source says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster? EYA. My expectations: Base on what I've learnt + Base on other sources
    • Are you surprised by what this source says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster? EYA. My expectations: Base on what I've learnt + Base on other sources Source B says:
    • Are you surprised by what this source says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster? EYA. My expectations: Base on what I've learnt + Base on other sources Source B says:
    • Are you surprised by what this source says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster? EYA. My expectations: Base on what I've learnt + Base on other sources Source B says: Government slower at Tamil Areas Focus on Sinahalese- majority areas
    • Are you surprised by what this source says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster? EYA. My expectations: Base on what I've learnt + Base on other sources Source B says: Government slower at Tamil Areas Focus on Sinahalese- majority areas support?
    • Are you surprised by what this source says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster? EYA. My expectations: Base on what I've learnt + Base on other sources Source B says: Government slower at Tamil Areas Focus on Sinahalese- majority areas support? Therefore, surprise?
    • Are you surprised by what this source says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster? EYA. My expectations: Base on what I've learnt + Base on other sources Source B says: Government slower at Tamil Areas Focus on Sinahalese- majority areas support? Therefore, surprise?
    • Are you surprised by what this source says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster? EYA. My expectations: Base on what I've learnt + Base on other sources Source B says: Government slower at Tamil Areas Focus on Sinahalese- majority areas support? Therefore, surprise? SL govt discriminates Tamils
    • Are you surprised by what this source says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster? EYA. My expectations: Base on what I've learnt + Base on other sources Source B says: Government slower at Tamil Areas Focus on Sinahalese- majority areas support? Therefore, surprise? SL govt discriminates Tamils Source C:Tamil areas in the North are "without adequate aid and other assistance" while the government channels "vast sums of international aid to the south, which has a Sinhalese majority"
    • Are you surprised by what this source says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster? EYA. My expectations: Base on what I've learnt + Base on other sources Source B says: Government slower at Tamil Areas Focus on Sinahalese- majority areas Supports Therefore, surprise? SL govt discriminates Tamils Source C:Tamil areas in the North are "without adequate aid and other assistance" while the government channels "vast sums of international aid to the south, which has a Sinhalese majority"
    • Are you surprised by what this source says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster? EYA. My expectations: Base on what I've learnt + Base on other sources Source B says: Government slower at Tamil Areas Focus on Sinahalese- majority areas Supports Therefore, not surprised SL govt discriminates Tamils Source C:Tamil areas in the North are "without adequate aid and other assistance" while the government channels "vast sums of international aid to the south, which has a Sinhalese majority"
    • Are you surprised by what this source says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster? EYA. My expectations: Base on what I've learnt + Base on other sources Source B says: Government slower at Tamil Areas Focus on Sinahalese- majority areas Supports SL govt discriminates Tamils Source C:Tamil areas in the North are "without adequate aid and other assistance" while the government channels "vast sums of international aid to the south, which has a Sinhalese majority" I'm not surprised by what Source B says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster.
    • Are you surprised by what this source says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster? EYA. My expectations: Base on what I've learnt + Base on other sources Supports SL govt discriminates Tamils Source C:Tamil areas in the North are "without adequate aid and other assistance" while the government channels "vast sums of international aid to the south, which has a Sinhalese majority" I'm not surprised by what Source B says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster. Source B says that government were "much slower to react in the Tamil areas. Instead, they concentrate their efforts on the Sinhalese-majority areas"
    • Are you surprised by what this source says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster? EYA. My expectations: + Base on other sources Source C:Tamil areas in the North are "without adequate aid and other assistance" while the government channels "vast sums of international aid to the south, which has a Sinhalese majority" I'm not surprised by what Source B says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster. Source B says that government were "much slower to react in the Tamil areas. Instead, they concentrate their efforts on the Sinhalese-majority areas" This supports what I already know, that the Sri Lankan government has been discriminating the Tamils since the 1960.
    • Are you surprised by what this source says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster? EYA. I'm not surprised by what Source B says about the reaction of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami disaster. Source B says that government were "much slower to react in the Tamil areas. Instead, they concentrate their efforts on the Sinhalese-majority areas" This supports what I already know, that the Sri Lankan government has been discriminating the Tamils since the 1960. Also, this is supported by Source C, which states that "Tamil areas in the North are "without adequate aid and other assistance" while the government channels "vast sums of international aid to the south, which has a Sinhalese majority"
    • What's the logic for being surprised? We are surprised when it does not support our expectations We are not surprised when it does support our expectations
    • So which method considers more things to set our expectations?? Only provenance Only one source What we know already What we know already + all sources + background info
    • So which method considers more things to set our expectations?? Only provenance Only one source What we know already What we know already + all sources + background info Lower Level Higher Level
    • Can we be surprsied / not surprsied by the purpose? Yes you can. Higher level for most cases as it considers more things.
    • Qns 1 (e)
    • Source A and Source B differs in what it says about the government intervention. Does this means that one of them is wrong? EYA Source A Source B Just show that one of them is wrong!
    • Source A and Source B differs in what it says about the government intervention. Does this means that one of them is wrong? EYA Source A Source B Just show that one of them is wrong! wrong!
    • Source A and Source B differs in what it says about the government intervention. Does this means that one of them is wrong? EYA Source A Source B Just show that one of them is wrong! wrong!
    • Source A and Source B differs in what it says about the government intervention. Does this means that one of them is wrong? EYA Source A Source B Just show that one of them is wrong! wrong! How do you show if something is wrong?
    • Source A and Source B differs in what it says about the government intervention. Does this means that one of them is wrong? EYA Source A Source B Just show that one of them is wrong! wrong! How do you show if something is wrong? = not true = not reliable
    • How about other possible combinations?
    • Source A and Source B differs in what it says about the government intervention. Does this means that one of them is wrong? EYA Source A Source B wrong!correct! Do I need to show that one is correct and the other is wrong?
    • Source A and Source B differs in what it says about the government intervention. Does this means that one of them is wrong? EYA Source A Source B wrong!correct! Do I need to show that one is correct and the other is wrong? No need cause the question asked if ONE OF THEM IS WRONG
    • Source A and Source B differs in what it says about the government intervention. Does this means that one of them is wrong? EYA Source A Source B wrong! This will sufficiently show that ONE OF THEM is wrong isn't it?
    • Source A and Source B differs in what it says about the government intervention. Does this means that one of them is wrong? EYA Source A Source B wrong! This will sufficiently show that ONE OF THEM is wrong isn't it?
    • Source A and Source B differs in what it says about the government intervention. Does this means that one of them is wrong? EYA Source A Source B wrong! Is there a need for this? wrong!
    • Source A and Source B differs in what it says about the government intervention. Does this means that one of them is wrong? EYA Source A Source B wrong! Is there a need for this? wrong! No. Cause showing that both are wrong still shows that ONE OF THEM is wrong .
    • Source A and Source B differs in what it says about the government intervention. Does this means that one of them is wrong? EYA Source A Source B Can this answer the question? Right! Right! No, none of them is wrong
    • Source A and Source B differs in what it says about the government intervention. Does this means that one of them is wrong? EYA Source A Source B Can this answer the question? Right! Right! No, none of them is wrong Yes you can. But you must explain why both are right even though the views are different.
    • Source A and Source B differs in what it says about the government intervention. Does this means that one of them is wrong? EYA Source A Source B Can this answer the question? Right! Right! No, none of them is wrong Yes you can. But you must explain why both are right even though the views are different. Disclaimer:This rarely occurs.
    • Source A and Source B differs in what it says about the government intervention. Does this means that one of them is wrong? EYA Weak logic Both are right because they just have different opinions (1)
    • Source A and Source B differs in what it says about the government intervention. Does this means that one of them is wrong? EYA Weak logic Both are right because they just have different opinions So if Source A says "Mr Luo is slim" Source B says "Mr Luo is fat" (1)
    • Source A and Source B differs in what it says about the government intervention. Does this means that one of them is wrong? EYA Weak logic Both are right because they just have different opinions So if Source A says "Mr Luo is slim" Source B says "Mr Luo is fat" Both sources are right, just different opinions? Both sources are right, just different opinions? (1)
    • Source A and Source B differs in what it says about the government intervention. Does this means that one of them is wrong? EYA Weak logic Both are right because they just have different opinions So if Source A says "Mr Luo is slim" Source B says "Mr Luo is fat" Both sources are right, just different opinions? Weak logic because candidate assumes both are reliable without checking. (1)
    • Source A and Source B differs in what it says about the government intervention. Does this means that one of them is wrong? EYA Weak logic Cross reference Source A with Source B (2) or cross ref Source B with Source A
    • Source A and Source B differs in what it says about the government intervention. Does this means that one of them is wrong? EYA Weak logic Cross reference Source A with Source B Eg: Source A is wrong because it is not true and not supported by Source B Eg: Source B is wrong because it is not true and not supported by Source A (2) or cross ref Source B with Source A
    • Source A and Source B differs in what it says about the government intervention. Does this means that one of them is wrong? EYA Weak logic Cross reference Source A with Source B Eg: Source A is wrong because it is not true and not supported by Source B Eg: Source B is wrong because it is not true and not supported by Source A (2) or cross ref Source B with Source A From the qns, we already know they don't support each other, but we are not sure if one of them is wrong. So it's asking you to do more checks! Cross reference with other sources!
    • Acceptable answers for this source-based case study
    • Source A is wrong - Cross ref with Source C - Purpose (bias to achieve purpose of getting Tamils to be on the Sri Lankan government's side) Can we prove Source B wrong? Source B has no purpose (from independent group. Not affiliated/bias to any sides) So cannot prove Source B wrong via purpose. No other sources to cross reference to show that Source B is wrong either.
    • Qns 1 (d)
    • Study Sources D and E. Does Source E prove that what the UN claimed in Source D was true? ? Explain your answer. [5]
    • Study Sources D and E. Does Source E prove that what the UN claimed in Source D was true? ? Explain your answer. [5] What did the UN claim in Source D?
    • What did the UN claim in Source D?
    • What did the UN claim in Source D? Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Does Source E prove that?
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Does Source E prove that?
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Source E
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Source E Tamil Tigers recruit Child Soldier Humans Rights Watch says
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Source E Tamil Tigers recruit Child Soldier Humans Rights Watch says Supports
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Source E Tamil Tigers recruit Child Soldier Humans Rights Watch says Supports Therefore true Therefore proves?
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Source E Tamil Tigers recruit Child Soldier Humans Rights Watch says Supports Source E proves what UN claims in Source D is true. In Source D, the UN claims that the "Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp after December's Tsunami".This is true as it is supported by Source E, which shows a child soldier, stating that this is a child soldier recruited by the Tamil Tigers. Therefore true Therefore proves?
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Source E Tamil Tigers recruit Child Soldier Humans Rights Watch says Supports Source E proves what UN claims in Source D is true. In Source D, the UN claims that the "Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp after December's Tsunami".This is true as it is supported by Source E, which shows a child soldier, stating that this is a child soldier recruited by the Tamil Tigers. Therefore true Therefore proves? LOW LEVEL ANS!
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Source E Tamil Tigers recruit Child Soldier Humans Rights Watch says Supports Source E proves what UN claims in Source D is true. In Source D, the UN claims that the "Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp after December's Tsunami".This is true as it is supported by Source E, which shows a child soldier, stating that this is a child soldier recruited by the Tamil Tigers. Therefore true Therefore proves? LOW LEVEL ANS! Why low level?
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Source E Tamil Tigers recruit Child Soldier Humans Rights Watch says Supports Source E proves what UN claims in Source D is true. In Source D, the UN claims that the "Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp after December's Tsunami".This is true as it is supported by Source E, which shows a child soldier, stating that this is a child soldier recruited by the Tamil Tigers. Therefore true Therefore proves? LOW LEVEL ANS! Why low level? If Source E is not reliable
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Source E Tamil Tigers recruit Child Soldier Humans Rights Watch says Source E proves what UN claims in Source D is true. In Source D, the UN claims that the "Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp after December's Tsunami".This is true as it is supported by Source E, which shows a child soldier, stating that this is a child soldier recruited by the Tamil Tigers. LOW LEVEL ANS! Why low level? If Source E is not reliable Even if it supports Source D
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Source E Tamil Tigers recruit Child Soldier Humans Rights Watch says Source E proves what UN claims in Source D is true. In Source D, the UN claims that the "Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp after December's Tsunami".This is true as it is supported by Source E, which shows a child soldier, stating that this is a child soldier recruited by the Tamil Tigers. LOW LEVEL ANS! Why low level? If Source E is not reliable Even if it supports Source D Does it prove Source D?
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Source E Tamil Tigers recruit Child Soldier Humans Rights Watch says Source E proves what UN claims in Source D is true. In Source D, the UN claims that the "Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp after December's Tsunami".This is true as it is supported by Source E, which shows a child soldier, stating that this is a child soldier recruited by the Tamil Tigers. does this prove that Source d is true? Mr Luo is super slim supports Source D Mr Luo is super slim
    • Source E proves what UN claims in Source D is true. In Source D, the UN claims that the "Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp after December's Tsunami".This is true as it is supported by Source E, which shows a child soldier, stating that this is a child soldier recruited by the Tamil Tigers. If source E is not reliable
    • Source E proves what UN claims in Source D is true. In Source D, the UN claims that the "Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp after December's Tsunami".This is true as it is supported by Source E, which shows a child soldier, stating that this is a child soldier recruited by the Tamil Tigers. If source E is not reliable a higher level answer will show that source e is not reliable
    • Source E proves what UN claims in Source D is true. In Source D, the UN claims that the "Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp after December's Tsunami".This is true as it is supported by Source E, which shows a child soldier, stating that this is a child soldier recruited by the Tamil Tigers. If source E is not reliable a higher level answer will show that source e is not reliable thus, no matter what source E says, it wouldn”t prove anything about source d because Source e is not reliable in the first place to be used!
    • Source E proves what UN claims in Source D is true. In Source D, the UN claims that the "Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp after December's Tsunami".This is true as it is supported by Source E, which shows a child soldier, stating that this is a child soldier recruited by the Tamil Tigers. higher level Source E does not proves what UN claims in Source D is true.This is because Source E is not reliable in what UN claims and therefore, unable to prove if Source D is true. ...(Continue with your reliability methods of cross referencing and using purpose)
    • But if you were careful, you”ll realise something is fishy for this source. Which makes the highest level reserved for something for this case only
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Source E Tamil Tigers recruit Child Soldier Humans Rights Watch says Let”s look at Source e again
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Source E Tamil Tigers recruit Child Soldier Humans Rights Watch says Let”s look at Source e again (in nov 2004)
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Source E Tamil Tigers recruit Child Soldier Humans Rights Watch says Let”s look at Source D again (in nov 2004)
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Source E Tamil Tigers recruit Child Soldier Humans Rights Watch says Let”s look at Source D again (in nov 2004)(in Jan 2005)
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Source E Tamil Tigers recruit Child Soldier Humans Rights Watch says Let”s look at background info (in nov 2004)(in Jan 2005)
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Source E Tamil Tigers recruit Child Soldier Humans Rights Watch says (in nov 2004)(in Jan 2005) Background info Tsunami in Dec 2004
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Source E Tamil Tigers recruit Child Soldier Humans Rights Watch says (in nov 2004)(in Jan 2005) Background info Tsunami in Dec 2004
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Source E Tamil Tigers recruit Child Soldier Humans Rights Watch says (in nov 2004)(in Jan 2005) Background info Tsunami in Dec 2004 Was this published before or after the tsunami?
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Source E Tamil Tigers recruit Child Soldier Humans Rights Watch says (in nov 2004)(in Jan 2005) Background info Tsunami in Dec 2004 YES SOURCE E was published before the tsunami!!! go to dramabutton.com for your sound effect
    • Source D UN says Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp AFTER December's Tsunami Source E Tamil Tigers recruit Child Soldier Humans Rights Watch says (in nov 2004)(in Jan 2005) Background info Tsunami in Dec 2004 So it does not say anything about what the un claimed! go to dramabutton.com for your sound effect
    • Examiners See! you must use your brains to Think!
    • Source E does not proves what UN claims in Source D is true. In Source D, the UN claims that the "Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers from relief camp after December's Tsunami". However, Source E shows that a child soldier recruited BEFORE the tsunami in Nov 2004.This means that although Source E shows that Tamil Tigers recruit child soldiers, they did not show that it was done after the tsunami, as it was claimed in Source D.Therefore, Source E is unable to prove if the UN's claims in Source D is true.
    • Let's try it on Source C. Continue to answer the following question on your answer sheet: Study Source C. Are you surprised by what the Tamil Tiger commander said about the responses of the Sri Lankan government to the tsunami? EYA. (e)