On October 23rd, 2014, we updated our
By continuing to use LinkedIn’s SlideShare service, you agree to the revised terms, so please take a few minutes to review them.
Students: Please read at least two others’ papers. Complete this form for each paperand turn the paper copies in at our last class.Author of the Paper _______Megan Gerdts_______________________________Title of Paper ________She doesn’t say_____________________________________Reviewer ______Lauren Nourse___________________________________________Date _______July 15. 2010___________________________Please check and give feedback on: o Formatting: needs page numbers o Citations: seem correct o Active vs. passive voice: see my notes for suggested changes o Areas for more elaboration o Organizational flow of ideas/themes: flowed well o Clarity: o Spelling: no changes o Grammar: no changes o Continuity of voice – not just a recitation of the researchers linked together Well constructed description of project At times repetitive but may be the nature of the review o Intro to the problem and the study Is there a research part to this or will the project be the creation of the user manual? o Importance of the issue/themes contributing to analysis of the issue Very well documented on need for the training. o Summary tells us key research findings/gaps/justification for the research project Clearly defined the gaps necessitating a project: just not sure esactly the extent of the project o Were you convinced? ______X_YES ___________NOAdditional Comments:Clearly and effectively reviewed the gap in training on technology and clearlyrestated the TPACK philosophy and how it will be used in her study.