Asset Management for Infrastructure: Identification, Prioritization and Justification

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Asset Management for Infrastructure: Identification, Prioritization and Justification - Presentation Transcript

    1. Water Main Asset Management Identification, Prioritization, Justification Evan N. Pratt, PE Principal 254 W. Eastland Street | Gallatin, Tennessee 37066 | www.ohm-advisors.com
    2. Learning Objectives • Develop an understanding for cheap and cost effective asset management using readily available data • Review a method for needs prioritization • Identify additional steps for prioritizing multiple assets
    3. Check In What’s it like in your community or agency?
    4. Check In Value of all of your infrastructure? Lowest cost of reinvestment? Who “gets it”?
    5. Check In Tools CIP 1 or more Utility Asset Management plans Combined Asset Management plan Budget for above
    6. Area: City of Romulus 35.9 mi2 Population: 2000 census: 22,979 2007 estimate: 24,414 Infrastructure: water main: 300 miles san. sewer: 150 miles roads: 220 miles Approximate Replacement Value: $1 Billion
    7. What is Asset Management?
    8. Providing the desired level of service at the lowest LIFE CYCLE cost.
    9. What is Asset Management? ?
    10. Asset Management with Simple Tools and Historic Data
    11. Your Tools Main break sheets Push pin map Spreadsheets Lists GIS
    12. Simple Tool
    13. Asset Condition Model Road Assets Condition Point of Major Rehabilitation Life of Asset Time
    14. Challenges for Water Main Asset Condition Model • Environment Condition • Material Point of Action • System Operation Time
    15. Two Central Questions Condition assessment • What is it • How can it be done? Prioritization • Critical Asset concept • When to act, in what order?
    16. Condition Assessment 1. Physical Signs 2. Service Delivery Signs 3. Signs of Increasing Risk
    17. Condition Assessment Physical Signs • Number of water main breaks increasing • Increasing age of water main Service Delivery Signs • Discoloration in the water • Inadequate water pressures • Inadequate fire hydrant flows
    18. Condition Assessment Signs of Increasing Risk • Critical pipe failures • Non-compliance with Safe Drinking Water Act • Severe breaks when they occur • Angry Planners or Elected officials…
    19. The W.I.N. Model Service Delivery • Pressure variations • Fire protection capacity or ISO hydrant test results • Pipe friction losses per length of pipe
    20. The W.I.N. Model Physical Conditions • Age of pipe assets • Number of water main breaks • Frequency of breaks • Corrosion
    21. The W.I.N. Model Risk Management • Severity of breaks • Consequences of failure • Future development potential
    22. City of Southfield Area: 26.2 mi2 Population: 2000 census: 78,296 2007 estimate: 76,285 Infrastructure: water main: 360 miles san. sewer: 300 miles roads: 242 miles Approximate Replacement Value: $1.5 Billion
    23. Simple Tool
    24. Quantification of Infrastructure Avg Avg Peak Head loss Group # D, inch Hr. psi ft/1,000 ft Age Breaks 1 6.7 45 3.42 1947 41 2 6.4 44 0.9 1972 26 3 6 39 0.52 1946 7 4 7.75 59 1.42 1976 17 5 7.4 51 2.56 1973 21 6 6.3 43 1.12 1953 27 7 6.9 47 2.4 1962 33 8 7 51 1.4 1959 7 9 12 52.5 0.001 2003 0 10 6.95 55 11.3 1954 40
    25. Prioritization of Infrastructure Friction Severity Pressure Age Break Community Corrosion WIN Priority Group Factor Index Factor Factor Factor Impact Factor Factor Ranking A 0.30 0.56 0.87 1.00 1.00 1 0.2 4.93 1 B 0.08 0.53 0.89 0.99 0.63 0.2 0.2 3.52 6 C 0.05 0.50 1.00 1.00 0.17 0 0 2.72 10 D 0.13 0.65 0.66 0.98 0.41 0 0.2 3.03 8 E 0.23 0.62 0.76 0.99 0.51 1 0 4.11 3 F 0.10 0.53 0.91 1.00 0.66 0 0 3.19 7 G 0.21 0.58 0.83 0.99 0.80 0.2 0.2 3.81 5 H 0.12 0.58 0.76 0.99 0.17 1 0.2 3.84 4 I 0.00 1.00 0.74 0.97 0.00 0 0.2 2.91 9 J 1.00 0.58 0.71 1.00 0.98 0.2 0.2 4.66 2
    26. The W.I.N. Model Physical Conditions • Age of pipe assets • Number of water main breaks • Frequency of breaks • Corrosion
    27. Collective Prioritization How to Eat the Elephant: • Water Main improvements • Sanitary sewer improvements • Pump Station improvements • Plant Improvements
    28. Collective Prioritization If Possible • Storm sewer improvements • Road improvements
    29. Roads Priority Map Water Main Priority Map Sanitary Sewer Priority Map
    30. Water Infrastructure Prioritization
    31. How to Get Behinder 80,000,000 70,000,000 60,000,000 50,000,000 Needed Funding $ Budget 40,000,000 30,000,000 Existing Funding 20,000,000 10,000,000 - 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Years
    32. Education Program: KISS
    33. Learning Objectives • Developing an understanding for cheap and cost effective asset management using readily available data • Evaluating a method for needs prioritization • Identifying additional steps for prioritizing multiple assets
    34. Key Points • People need to know the total value of your system • Use the car analogy; millions are a modest % • Assess the condition of your assets • Prioritize replacement and maintenance
    35. Key Points • Engage decision makers in the categories for prioritization • Critical assets, development, fire protection all get people’s attention! Tie to reinvestment needs.

    + OHM Advancing CommunitiesOHM Advancing Communities, 3 months ago

    custom

    255 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    Government organizations have to balance declining more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 255
      • 253 on SlideShare
      • 2 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 35
    Most viewed embeds
    • 2 views on http://blog.ohm-advisors.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 2 views on http://blog.ohm-advisors.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories