Efficient market theory, supported by Nobel Prize in economics research, says you cannot beat or time the market, and the best you can do is remain fully invested with a portfolio engineered to give you market returns at the least possible cost. See www.indexfunds.com
Ironically, efficient market theory requires that a large percentage of market participants engage in trying to beat the market for it to work
Active:
The investor/trader believes that by taking some form of action, he can beat the market. That action relies on an edge which may be fundamental or technical in nature, and generally represents the action driven by a specific theory of how the market works, a specific point of view, a specific timeframe, and/or a combination of these
Ironically, there are more theories than there are traders
Fundamental vs Technical
Fundamentals:
belief in the power of numbers and analysis to establish an objective value for stock price
buy the stocks with the greatest difference between intrinsic value and current price.
the market is a weighing machine.
Technicals:
all information is factored into the current price already;
prices follow patterns which have tendencies that repeat and which can guide us into favorable conditions
Human emotions affect price as much as intrinsic value and rational calculations
The market is a voting machine
Combination:
Blend the strategies to achieve the best of both worlds
Fundamental Approach
Beliefs: By analyzing business models, financial statements, market conditions, I will be able to identify companies with a competitive advantage, project their earnings forward, and then determine if they are trading at a discount to their net present value.
Fundamental Approach
Motto: I will open 1000 oysters to find a pearl
Advantages:
To the extent you are numbers and math based, you reduce subjectivity
Stock screeners are available free, and cut down the work load
The number crunching is not complicated just extensive, so it is easily done by computers
Consider outsourcing the research and filtering to professional value pickers or professional growth pickers
In the long run the market is a weighing machine and value will rise to the top
Fundamental Approach
Problems:
A lot of number crunching
Trust in the integrity of numbers
You are going up against Harvard MBAs and quant shops
Large cap records are complicated and also subject to interpretation
Small caps have the most volatility and are subject to the most market risk going forward which may not be reflected in historical financial records
Markets and assumptions change faster than financial reports
Harder to aggregate sectors and regions than individual stocks
Technical Approach
Beliefs: By analyzing historical patterns of price action and applying statistics we can find conditions that are favorable for buying and selling. Emotions play a large part in market decisions and these emotional decisions are reflected at key moments in many price patterns which can be used to our advantage.
Technical Approach
Motto: History repeats itself
Advantages:
To the extent you are numbers and math based, you reduce subjectivity
Stock screeners are available free, and cut down the work load
The number crunching is not complicated just extensive, so it is easily done by computers
Consider outsourcing the research and filtering to technicians
In the short run, the market is a voting machine, and psychology becomes more important the shorter the time frame
Easier to analyze and trade sectors and regions which have specific characteristics and patterns for their respective tickers
Technical Approach
Problems:
A lot of number crunching
Analysis paralysis
You are going up against Harvard MBAs and quant shops
Reliability of patterns
Degrees of freedom & curve fitting
Discipline required to follow a system through drawdowns
Chasing the perfect indicator
Can lack an anchor to a realistic model of market action
Bottom Up Approach
Look at individual cases and search for value and opportunity one company at a time
Look for the unique, the undervalued the over looked, the misunderstood, the anomaly
Find your opportunity and wait for the market to come to you
You don’t have to understand the whole market, you just have to understand 1 unique story to have an edge
Supported by a lot of analysis and anecdotal evidence
Top Down Approach
Given the weight and influence of institutional money, most of the variation in stock price (75%) is a function of the overall market conditions and then the sectors that companies are in
Only a fraction (25%?) of the variation in a company’s price is a function of the company itself
Therefore it makes sense to look at broad market and sector conditions first and make wise asset allocation decisions, and not get lost in the weeds where you are inefficient
Supported by a lot of analysis and anecdotal evidence
A market assessment
Should include at least the following:
Enough frequency to identify trends within your action timeframe
Early enough identification of trends to make action meaningful
Disciplined and comprehensive
Identifies strong and weak areas in the market
Based on a philosophical model of how the market works
Assumptions and beliefs identified
Robust enough to work in all market conditions
Establish a framework for action
So what? Now what?
How do you navigate?
How do you choose?
What works?
What does a reasonably accurate assessment of the market look like?
If you had one, what would you do with it?
Choices everywhere
Given a reasonably comprehensive, accurate, objective assessment of the market:
What should I do?
Buy strength? (on breakouts or pullbacks?)
Buy weakness? (on breakdowns or bounces?)
Sell strength? (sell breakouts?)
Sell weakness? (can I borrow the stock?)
A set of beliefs and a conclusion
Tortoise beliefs:
Institutional money moves the markets
Money follows performance, like mice follow cheese
Movement occurs in patterns, like the seasons
There are more trend followers than counter-trend players by number and capitalization
Institutions favor inactivity and safe trend following, and at a minimum: diversification, due to fiduciary responsibility
Weekly analysis will identify patterns of institutional money movement in time to seize opportunity and prevent disaster
Top down approach is an efficient way to analyze world markets for an edge
Technical and fundamental approaches both have merit, but the shorter your time frame the more important technical analysis becomes
Buying strength is the most reliable method, most aligned with institutional preferences
The longer the time period of holding, the less important holding out for a more favorable entry becomes
Price is objective, everything else is a forecast and an opinion
Tortoise conclusion
Individual investors have an edge in flexibility, agility, and freedom that allows them to meet their personal investment objectives
Picking a set of markets
Cover the world market, so that no macroeconomic opportunity goes unnoticed
Use Exchange Traded Funds as research tools and trading instruments because:
Tax efficient
Very cheap (“cheaper than Vanguard” cheap)
Variety
Broad baskets (world indices and regions)
narrower sectors & styles
individual countries
Analyzing markets
Many ways to do it
Relative strength
Point and figure charts to indicate sector statistics
Price relative to 200 day moving average
Volume patterns
Elliot waves
Phases of the moon
Tortoise Index: price performance over multiple time periods, with an emphasis on near term
7 regions of the Tortoise world market model
Simple enough to grasp at a glance
Broad enough to cover the world and identify edges
You can drill down for individual countries & US styles
Emerging markets EEM Europe EZU Latin America 40 (large caps) ILF European/Australasian index EFA Asia (less Japan) EPP Japan EWJ US S&P 500 Index SPY Name Ticker
Weekly Regional performance
Tortoise Index concept:
Compare each region against all ETFs for each time period
How did the region do compared to the best and worst?
Ranks on a 1-100 scale proportional to best and worst
Combine into a single easily understood measure on a 1-100 scale
Identifies strong regions, can drill down into strong countries and sectors
Note how performance of EEM amd EWJ (vs the S&P) are rewarded by the Tndx
World Market Model US Indices: each of these Exchange Traded Funds is liquid and are traded like stocks on the AMEX, with the important distinction that they can be shorted on a downtick DIA SPY QQQ IJJ MDY IJK IJS IJR IJT Value Blend Growth Large Mid Small
World Market Model DIA SPY QQQ IJJ MDY IJK IJS IJR IJT EWJ EPP ILF EFA EZU EKH TLT RWR LQD Regional indices from around the world: each of these ETFs is liquid and are traded like stocks on the AMEX, with the important distinction that they can be shorted on a downtick. These ETFs add important overseas regions as well as a set of miscellaneous sectors that are not correllated to US equities Japan Asia, less Japan Longterm Treasuries Corporate bond index Real estate index a mix of Europe/ Asia European largecaps European index Latin America 40 large caps
World Market Model DIA SPY QQQ IJJ MDY IJK IJS IJR IJT EWJ EPP ILF EFA EZU EKH TLT RWR LQD EWG EWK EWL EWN EWD EWO EWP EWQ EWU Country indices from around the world: adds in the next layer of detail with individual countries and additional key stocks (NEM and PD) for commodities. BEARX NEM PD IYM HOV EWH EWM EWS EWT EWA EWY Australia South Korea Hong Kong Malaysia Taiwan Singapore Sweden Germany Belgium Switzerland Netherlands Austria Spain France UK EWC EWW EWZ EEM Canada Brazil Emerging markets Mexico Home builders Gold Basic Mat Metals Bear Fund IFN India
So what? Based on 100K portfolio So far, consistent outperformance 85.60% 20.40% 27.90% 98.10% N/A 1999 % -36.10% -9.80% -6.03% 26.60% N/A 2000 % -31.13% -12.12% -5.62% 9.88% N/A 2001 % -38.41% -23.35% -16.89% -8.62% N/A 2002 % 43.54% 22.19% 21.34% 22.71% N/A 2003 % 7.82% 7.73% 2.50% 10.42% N/A 2004 % $104,810 $103,500 $99,655 $127,728 $109,161 2005 $Value 4.81% 3.50% -0.34% 27.73% 9.16% 2005 YTD% -2.51% -1.87% -1.67% 1.07% -1.22% This Week % NASDAQ (QQQQ) S&P 500 (SPY) DOW (DIA) Tortoise Mutual Funds Annual Passive ETF System Weekly Bench Mark - as of Dec 31, 2005
Roadmap Passive Active Fundamental Technical Combination Top Down Bottoms Up Action Management Assessment Markets Assessment Markets Management Assessment
0 comments
Post a comment