Painter’s taPe
Pedagogy
Three information literacy instruction sessions using active learning techniques
(and markers, cra...
Class:
Children’s literature – English 310
Assignment:
Annotated Bibliography
Painter’s Tape Pedagogy Activity:
In groups, build a concept map related to
a selected topic (The prof had a list for
them...
IL Standard 1.1: Define and articulate
the need for information
Student Learning Outcome: Identify key
terms related to a ...
Time: 25-30 minutes
Additional Class Activities:
Use search terms to find
articles in ERIC and MLA
Required Prep:
• Print and cut out large,
medium, and small
bubbles for five groups
• Make example
• Set up five group
sta...
How it went:
Very well!
Students engaged in
productive smallgroup discussions
and were excited to
share their maps
with th...
Potential Improvement:
Better connection
between this activity and
database searching.
In the second part of
class I demon...
Class:
English 102 - Composition II
Assignment:
Annotated Bibliography
Painter’s Tape Pedagogy (Mini) Activity:
Groups solve Citation Puzzles
IL Standard 5.3:
Acknowledge the use of
information sources
Student Learning Outcome:
Arrange different kinds of
MLA citat...
Time: 5 minutes
Additional Class Activities:
• Discuss generating
search terms and
searching in MLA
International
Bibliogr...
Required Prep:
• Select five different
types of articles
• Create citation puzzles
for each citation
How it went:
A little rough
Students more or less tolerated
the activity, but they weren’t
especially exCITEd (har har har...
Class:
Public Speaking – Communications 330
Assignments:
Speeches throughout the semester
Painter’s Tape Pedagogy Activity 1:
The Continuum of Trustworthiness

Groups are given different resources
(some library, ...
Painter’s Tape Pedagogy Activity 2:
Groups find a board with a picture of
their resource. They decide:
• Who is the audien...
IL Standard 3.2: Articulate and apply
initial criteria for evaluating both
information and its sources.
Student Learning O...
Time: 30 minutes
Additional Class Activities:
• Brief “Research Pro Tips”
slideshow
• Groups use their resource to
find an...
Required Prep:
• Make sheets for each resource
• Set up Continuum of Trustworthiness
• Set up one white board per group
wi...
How it went:
Very well!
Students were engaged
and talkative, especially
when each group
discussed their
whiteboard questio...
Potential Improvement:
More time
(or less activities)

We were rushed at the
end to write up
evaluations of the
specific s...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Painter's Tape Pedagogy

720

Published on

Three information literacy instruction sessions using active learning techniques.

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
720
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Painter's Tape Pedagogy

  1. 1. Painter’s taPe Pedagogy Three information literacy instruction sessions using active learning techniques (and markers, crayons, bright paper, and painter’s tape) Lauren Wallis Reference & Instruction Librarian
  2. 2. Class: Children’s literature – English 310 Assignment: Annotated Bibliography
  3. 3. Painter’s Tape Pedagogy Activity: In groups, build a concept map related to a selected topic (The prof had a list for them to choose from, so I gave each group a topic from the list)
  4. 4. IL Standard 1.1: Define and articulate the need for information Student Learning Outcome: Identify key terms related to a research topic
  5. 5. Time: 25-30 minutes Additional Class Activities: Use search terms to find articles in ERIC and MLA
  6. 6. Required Prep: • Print and cut out large, medium, and small bubbles for five groups • Make example • Set up five group stations with bubbles, painter’s tape, and markers/crayons
  7. 7. How it went: Very well! Students engaged in productive smallgroup discussions and were excited to share their maps with the class. I did this activity with two classes. One was much more worried about “doing it right” than the other. I had to encourage them not to overthink it.
  8. 8. Potential Improvement: Better connection between this activity and database searching. In the second part of class I demonstrated searches in MLA and ERIC using the terms they had generated, but I wish I had made it more interactive. If I do this activity again, I will cut down on my demo time and ask groups to share their search processes with the entire class.
  9. 9. Class: English 102 - Composition II Assignment: Annotated Bibliography
  10. 10. Painter’s Tape Pedagogy (Mini) Activity: Groups solve Citation Puzzles
  11. 11. IL Standard 5.3: Acknowledge the use of information sources Student Learning Outcome: Arrange different kinds of MLA citations in the correct order
  12. 12. Time: 5 minutes Additional Class Activities: • Discuss generating search terms and searching in MLA International Bibliography • Students locate an article in MLA, generate a citation, use it to help them with their Citation Puzzle, and add the citation to a Class Works Cited (shared Google Doc).
  13. 13. Required Prep: • Select five different types of articles • Create citation puzzles for each citation
  14. 14. How it went: A little rough Students more or less tolerated the activity, but they weren’t especially exCITEd (har har har) or engaged. Potential Improvements: Students seemed surprised and intimidated by how much they had to “do” in the class session. I think they might have needed more traditional, hands-on help with using MLA International Bibliography.
  15. 15. Class: Public Speaking – Communications 330 Assignments: Speeches throughout the semester
  16. 16. Painter’s Tape Pedagogy Activity 1: The Continuum of Trustworthiness Groups are given different resources (some library, some web-based). They decide where to place their resource between “Not Trustworthy” and “Extremely Trustworthy”
  17. 17. Painter’s Tape Pedagogy Activity 2: Groups find a board with a picture of their resource. They decide: • Who is the audience? • What is the purpose?
  18. 18. IL Standard 3.2: Articulate and apply initial criteria for evaluating both information and its sources. Student Learning Outcome: Examine and compare information from various sources in order to evaluate reliability, validity, accuracy, authority, timeliness, and point of view.
  19. 19. Time: 30 minutes Additional Class Activities: • Brief “Research Pro Tips” slideshow • Groups use their resource to find an article • Groups evaluate the credibility of the specific source they found. They write up their evaluation on a slide in the presentation (a shared Google Presentation) • Groups come to the front to discuss their evaluation and share how they found their source.
  20. 20. Required Prep: • Make sheets for each resource • Set up Continuum of Trustworthiness • Set up one white board per group with guiding questions
  21. 21. How it went: Very well! Students were engaged and talkative, especially when each group discussed their whiteboard questions.
  22. 22. Potential Improvement: More time (or less activities) We were rushed at the end to write up evaluations of the specific sources and share with the class. This would have worked better with two class sessions—the first for the whiteboard activity and the second for finding specific sources, evaluating them, and sharing with the class.
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×