Evem amsterdam
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
564
On Slideshare
156
From Embeds
408
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 408

http://comunicacionysalud.es 408

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Validity of the EVEM scale in assessing the integrity of Motivational Interviewing delivered in Primary Health Care settings Manuel Campíñez, Jesús Manuel Novo, Juan Carlos Arboniés, Josep Maria Bosch, Luis Ángel Pérula, Remedios Martín Communication and Health Group of the Spanish Society of Family Physicians (SEMFYC).
  • 2. why? . brief encounters . nonverbal behavior . several targets . other medical demands…
  • 3. how it started…
  • 4. one year later…
  • 5. face, content and consensus validity . 16 experts, 3 Delphi rounds . 25 items, 0-2 Likert scale
  • 6. six years later…
  • 7. inter-rater reliability Cohen’s Kappa Indexes Very good (>0.8) Good (0.61-0.8) Moderate (0.4- 0.6)
  • 8. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients Very good (>0.9) Good (0.71-0.9) Moderate (0.51- 0.7) global ICC was 0.967 inter-rater reliability
  • 9. . Cronbach’s alpha was 0.967 internal consistency
  • 10. factor analysis . 2 dimensions explained 75.8% of the variance found
  • 11. . 14 items, 0-4 likert scale refining of the scale
  • 12. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients Very good- moderate Acceptable Low what if we train somebody in its use?
  • 13. . global ICC was 0.82 (0.72 - 0.96) . internal consistency (alpha) was 0.917 to 0.979 what if we train somebody in its use?
  • 14. . empathy, positioning, coherence with positioning, open questions, reflective listening, summaries, affirmation, objectives, action plan, avoinding discord, evocation, collaboration, authonomy support and compassion what does it look like?
  • 15. what’s different? empathy, avoiding discord positioning, coherence with positioning, reflective listening, affirmation, objectives, action plan, evocation, collaboration, authonomy support compassion open questions, summaries,
  • 16. thank you!!!
  • 17. www.comunicacionysalud.es llibreteria@gmail.com