Your SlideShare is downloading.
×

×
Saving this for later?
Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Like this presentation? Why not share!

- Carbajal Francisco Libros Espiritu... by Rickyy Iriarte 226 views
- PMA Guillermo Sicardi 2014 42 mater... by PTFParaguay 58 views
- Reg. regimen precios 97.1296 by Rickyy Iriarte 55 views
- Indicators that affect oil prices by richoey 434 views
- Ejercicio 2 by Rickyy Iriarte 12 views
- Sesión 2 el van y otros criterios by Rickyy Iriarte 67 views

291

Published on

No Downloads

Total Views

291

On Slideshare

0

From Embeds

0

Number of Embeds

0

Shares

0

Downloads

6

Comments

0

Likes

2

No embeds

No notes for slide

- 1. WELCOME TO AN INTRODUCTION TO FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS FOR REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL Before going on to financial modelling of potential real estate projects or assets, you need to have some understanding of financial maths. Ideally, you also need to be able to use Excel. Press F5 and Page Down
- 2. 1. Rationale and Approach
- 3. “What is the point of this stuff?” • BECAUSE THESE BASIC FINANCIAL MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES PROVIDE YOU WITH THE KEY KNOWLEDGE NEEDED TO: – ESTIMATE THE VALUE OF REAL ESTATE ASSETS – ESTIMATE HOW MUCH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES ARE WORTH – PROVIDE ADVICE ABOUT THE WORTH OF REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND PROJECTS – PROBABLY MOST IMPORTANTLY, THEY PROVIDE THE BASIS FOR THE APPRAISAL OF ANY FINANCIAL ASSET (SHARES AND BONDS) AND ARE USED BY BUSINESSES TO DECIDE HOW TO ALLOCATE THEIR CAPITAL MOST EFFECTIVELY – DON’T FIGHT IT. DON’T BE FRIGHTENED OF IT. TAKE IT ON AND BE POSITIVE. IT’S NOT THAT DIFFICULT
- 4. “Do I need to know anything first?” • No - not really!
- 5. Does this link to any body of theory that I should find out about? • If you insist…it’s about capital budgeting theory and how firms should make their investment decisions in an optimal manner. It’s defined broadly as • Warning – fairly important definition coming • • • • The process in which a business determines whether projects such as buying new equipment or investing in a company are worth pursuing. Usually, a potential project's expected cash inflows and outflows are estimated in order to assess whether the returns generated meet a target benchmark. Hey – they could even be buying a property or carrying out a property development project They are many, many, many, many, many, many, many, many, many, many many, many, many, many, many books on project appraisal, investment appraisal, capital budgeting etc broadly covering this area. Why do think this is?
- 6. “I’m tired. Couldn’t you just tell me the very minimum?” • Well, the basic approach is that you try to get the present value of all the project’s future cash flows (i.e. costs and revenues) and add them together. • Basically you need to estimate and set out the answers to five questions 1 2 3 4 5 How much cash will be paid out? When will it be paid out? How much cash will be received? When will it be received? the required return from the What is investment?
- 7. 2. The basics of investment return
- 8. “Could you tell me a bit more about this return thing?” • Well done - you’ve spotted that it’s important • Well, because investors are giving up their money, they generally (albeit the financial world seems to have gone a bit weird in the downturn) want some return to compensate for – Losing the ability to spend their cash –loss of liquidity – Losing purchasing power of cash due to inflation – Not getting it back - risk
- 9. I’m afraid that I still don’t really get this return thing. • OK – let’s think of a really simple example. • You buy a share for £100, get a £5 dividend and then sell it for £110 (ignore transaction costs etc). What was the return? • Ummm • Well, you made £15 – that’s the cash return • It is usually expressed in % terms • Is it? • Yep - £15 is 15% of the initial investment of £100 – you made a 15% return on your investment • Did I? • Yep – it’s important to know what return investors require in order to work out whether an investment is worth making.
- 10. Can’t we find any signals in markets about what returns investors require for projects? • • That sounds like another suspiciously well-informed question! Yes – the government bond market is supposed to provide a signal of investors’ required return for loss of liquidity and for expected inflation but since, outside the Eurozone, governments can print their own currency, there is no risk of not getting your money from them. Govt bonds provide us with a signal of the risk free rate of return (an important concept in investment). There’s a joke that some govt. bonds in the • • • • • Eurozone provide return free risk. Now I get it! Ah – so if I can get a return of 10% from govt bonds, I’ll want higher returns from all other investments? Normally, yes. A project’s target rate of return could be based on the risk free rate of return from government bonds plus a risk premium related to the project’s risk Alternatively – most companies also have a (weighted average) cost of capital. This is often used as a basis for estimating their target (internal) rate of return. It’s also call the “required” or the “hurdle” rate of return Stealing from wonderful Wikipedia, the WACC is the minimum return that a company must earn on an asset to satisfy its creditors, owners, and other providers of capital, or they will invest elsewhere To be honest (at last) – getting the right WACC for a project is tricky and it is similarly problematic to estimate for the risk premium above bonds. Basically, in practice, it’s often hard to robustly estimate the target rate of return for investments or projects –
- 11. 3. Compounding – calculating the future value of money
- 12. We? OK, I’m signed up • • • • • • Hmmmm…Suspiciously positive…OK – the first thing that you need to be able to do is to estimate costs or revenues payable or receivable in the future. How do I do that? Well, often a starting point is what they are today and you then need to know how much they’ll change in the future. Let’s say that you think that you will need a hair transplant (or substantive cosmetic surgery) in five years’ time (think of it as refurbishment). This currently costs £10,000. Due to growing demand, the Institute of Cosmetic Surgeons is forecasting that the costs of such procedures will increase at 10% per annum. The question is – how much a hair transplant will cost in five years’ time assuming that the forecast is correct? Sorry I’m interrupting this question to announce that… • Financial forecasts are hardly ever correct • • That’s not really relevant now but it’s important to bear it in mind when we start to use forecasts for projecting future rents, future costs, future sale prices etc. for real estate developments and assets. Moving swiftly on…
- 13. It’s to use a compounding formula: 1 plus the interest rate to the power of the number of periods: (1+i)n There’s an easier way! You need to be able to find and find the xy button on your calculator After one year 1.1 = £11,000 After two years £11,000times 1 plus growth rate (10%) 1.1 = £12,100 After three years £12,100times 1 plus growth rate (10%) 1.1 = £13,310 After four years £13,310times 1 plus growth rate (10%) 1.1 = £14,641 After five years After the first year’s growth, there’s another £1000 that can also grow. £10,000times 1 plus growth rate (10%) £14,641times 1 plus growth rate (10%) 1.1 = £16,105 This is the compounding effect. You get interest on the previous interest. After five years, it’s grown to £16,105 In this case (1+0.10)5 = 1.61051 so multiplying our original £10,000 by 1.61051 gives us £16,105.10. 0.1 is 10% Think of it as getting a total growth of 61.105% over the five year period. The extra 11.105% over the 10% per year is the result of growth on the previous growth
- 14. 4. Discounting – calculating the present value of future money
- 15. What about if I want to estimate the today’s (i.e. present) value of the right to receive some money in the future • • • • • • • • • • That’s a worryingly informed question. I’m think of selling my inheritance to pay my tuition fees Er, let’s take a more hypothetical example. Let’s say that you’re a cosmetic surgeon and you are pretty sure that you’re going to get £16,105 in five years time. However, you need money today to cover a negligence claim. So you decide to see how much someone would give you NOW for this asset. Yes! It’s an asset. Most investments or projects involve the right to get money in the future in return for spending money in advance. To be honest – it looks like a pretty risky asset if they’re trying to settle a negligence claim. It’s really the opposite of compounding – we convert future incomes to their present value. With compounding, we’re converting a current income to a future value. Let’s assume that the cosmetic surgeon’s father, having retired with a lump sum from his pension, has got cash that he wants to invest. He requires a 10% return per annum (the per annum bit is often left unstated) from any investment. What will he offer? Given a required return of 10% per annum, getting to the present value of the right to receive £16,105 in five years time is roughly/approximately/nearly/almost like taking 10% off per year to provide the return to the father As you can see overleaf…
- 16. This may be new. Discounting is simply the process of estimating the present value of future cash flows Discounted for Since discounting is the opposite of growing, it is the inverse of the growth formula – it could also be (1.1)-1 1year 16105times 1 divided by 1 plus discount rate 1/1.1 = 14641 Discounted for another year 14641times 1 divided by 1 plus discount rate 1/1.1 = 13310 Discounted for another year 13310times 1 divided by 1 plus discount rate 1/1.1 = 12100 Discounted for another year 12100times 1 divided by 1 plus discount rate 1/1.1 = 11000 Discounted for another years 11000times 1 divided by 1 plus discount rate 1/1.1 = 10000 Again - there’s an easier way It’s to use the discounting formula - 1 plus the interest rate to the power of MINUS the number of periods: (1+i)-n Not really a surprise that we get to £10,000. If we grow £10,000 at 10% per annum for 5 years we get £16105. If we discount £16105 for five years at 10%, we get £10,000. Compounding and discounting are opposites. In this case (1+0.10)-5 = 0.62092 so multiplying our original £16,105 by 0.62092 gives us £10,000. Note that, when discounting, approximately 10% per annum is being deducted from a declining sum in the same way that, when compounding, 10% per annum is being added to an increasing sum. Note also the similarities with the table (overleaf) showing how it grows.
- 17. Compounding to obtain the future value of a current cash flow Today Next year The year after Three years time Four years time Five years time We have It has grown to It has grown even more It continues to grow You get the picture We end up with £10,000 £11,000 £12,100 £13,310 £14,641 £16,105 Discounting to obtain the present value of future cash flow Five years in the future Brought back one year Brought back two years Brought back three years Brought back… Today We hope to receive It is worth It is worth It is worth It is worth It is worth £16,105 £14,641 £13,310 £12,100 £11,000 £10,000
- 18. I really need a break now • • • • • • …and you deserve it But it’s really important that you get the concept of present value The value of many assets is often calculated by estimating their future cash flows, present valuing/discounting them (i.e. adjusting them for the required return) and adding them up. This is the same for properties, bonds, shares, business opportunities…the Net Present Value of the project or investment is estimated. Actually, in an efficient market, the value of any investment should be the sum of the present values of all the future revenues generated by that investment and.. Ok – I’ll stop and you can stop too But if you’re a still bit hazy…have another look at the present value stuff when if you come back for NPV and IRR Sorry if I have laboured the point a bit – but once you ‘get’ these basic concepts, a lot of real estate appraisal using cash flows analysis is extremely straightforward.
- 19. 5. Calculating Net Present Value
- 20. OK – tell me about this NPV thingy, er, please • • • • • • Won’t take long Net Present Value is the standard technique in investment or project appraisal for deciding whether a project is worth doing – or an investment is worth making The NPV rule is that: if discounted at the target rate of return, the NPV is positive, then the project is acceptable. Let’s take a hypothetical example I am rich (it’s very hypothetical) and I’m thinking of buying a five bed-room house in London at a cost of £1,000,000 (it’s only money) and letting it to students (yuk!). I think that I will get £50,000 a year in rent (because I’m worth it!) and a forecaster states (let’s ignore what I said earlier about forecasters) that house prices in London should rise by 20% (overall) over the next five years. • • Five years is also my investment holding period. I have a target rate of return of 10% per annum (A bit greedy?) • Let’s ignore all the “clutter” of agents fees, management costs, repairs and replacement, timing of rental payments, stamp duty, rental growth etc – albeit, in practice, they will be important determinants of my return. We’ll do this later. • • Should I make this investment? If the NPV is positive, I should. If it is negative, I shouldn’t. • What is it then?
- 21. First set out period of cash flow Period 0 1 2 3 4 5 Set out how much cash is going out and when it goes out Capital Outlay -£1,000,000 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 For simplicity, I’m assuming that the rent is paid annually n arrears Surprise- there’s an easier way Set out how much income is coming in and when it comes in Income £0 £50,000 £50,000 £50,000 £50,000 £50,000 Set out how much capital is returned and when it is returned Now we have the all important Net Cash Flow generated by the investment This is where I’m taking my return by discounting each cash flow at 10% p.a. Capital receipt £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,200,000 Net Cash Flow -£1,000,000 £50,000 £50,000 £50,000 £50,000 £1,250,000 PV factor @ 10% 1.0000 0.9091 0.8264 0.7513 0.6830 0.6209 NPV Everything is converted to PV terms Present Value -£1,000,000 £45,455 £41,322 £37,566 £34,151 £776,152 -£65,355 The current market value grown by 20% Is the sum of the present values Excel has an NPV function that will find the NPV of the NCF automatically. You should find out how to use it…moving on Is negative! The investment should be rejected. How much should I offer assuming I want a 10% return and my assumptions are correct? Basically, it’s the £1,000,000 minus £65,355. This is actually called the Gross Present Value. It’s the same as the NPV – but the initial investment is ignored. In this case, it represents what this investment is worth to me given my expectations and required return. That’s £934,645
- 22. 5. Internal Rate of Return
- 23. Period 0 1 2 3 4 5 Capital Outlay -£934,645 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 Income £0 £50,000 £50,000 £50,000 £50,000 £50,000 Capital receipt Net Cash Flow PV factor @ 10% Present Value £0 -£934,645 1.0000 -£934,645 £0 £50,000 0.9091 £45,455 £0 £50,000 0.8264 £41,322 £0 £50,000 0.7513 £37,566 £0 £50,000 0.6830 £34,151 £1,200,000 £1,250,000 0.6209 £776,152 NPV £0 If I pay £934,645, I get my 10% return per annum and nothing is leftover. The NPV is zero. If the NPV was positive, I’d get more than 10% return per annum, if it was negative, I’d get less than 10% return per annum. Let’s go back and look at these returns in more detail assuming that I’ve paid the original purchase price of £1,000,000 (only because the numbers are more tractable)
- 24. Period 0 1 2 3 4 5 You tend to get return from two sources – income (rent from properties) and capital (changes in the value of the asset) Capital Outlay -£1,000,000 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 Income £0 £50,000 £50,000 £50,000 £50,000 £50,000 Capital receipt £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,200,000 Net Cash Flow -£1,000,000 £50,000 £50,000 £50,000 £50,000 £1,250,000 NPV @ 10% -£65,355 IRR 8.38% Let’s start to think in terms of my percentage returns on my £1,000,000 What’s my income return per period as percentage of capital invested? Fairly straightforward - £50,000 is 5% of £1,000,000 0 -1000000 -1000000 1 50000 50000 The capital return is more tricky. I invest £1m and get £1.2m back. That’s 20% over five years. That’s just about 4% per year – but a bit less because of the compounding. (Annoyingly) receiving 4% per year would give you more than 20% over five years. It’s actually 3.71% per annum. 2 50000 50000 3 50000 50000 4 50000 50000 So, I’m getting 5% per annum for income return and 3.71% capital return, I don’t see any other return. So my total return must be close to 8.7% per annum. This is a good approximation – but just an approximation – of my internal rate of return or IRR. There one thing that you really need to remember about the IRR. It’s the discount rate at which the NPV is zero. 5 50000 1200000 1250000 Excel has an IRR function that you can use to get the IRR of any cash flow. Applying it to the cash flow above, gives us… We can get a fairly good approximation here because the numbers are so simple. The IRR is quite tricky to work out mathematically and manually. It requires an iterative process (i.e. some guessing) – and it will only be an approximation. Excel does it pretty effortlessly and more accurately. The important thing is that you understand the principles – it is broadly the total return per period received on capital invested. However, there are many technical issues with its underlying assumptions (reinvestment rate), mathematical quirks (you can get two IRRs when you have a number of sign changes in the net cash flow) and what to do when the NPV rule (choose investment with highest NPV) - and IRR rule (choose investment with highest IRR) are in conflict. But hopefully, you’ve read this far to be reassured that you’ve got the essentials of it here. NPV £0.00 IRR 8.38%
- 25. G THAT’S IT! HONESTLY, I THINK YOU’VE DONE ENOUGH FINANCIAL MATHS NOW TO MOVE ON TO LOOK AT CARRYING OUT CASH FLOW APPRAISALS OF REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES

Be the first to comment