The Teaching and Learning Cycle – Blended Learning Face-to-Face Online Face-to-Face Face-to-Face Instructor’s lecture on target topic by synthesizing various ideas manifested in learners’ online messages Learners post reflections on issues raised by the instructor online Oral presentation and discussion by learners Instructor briefly introduces the topic of the next session In-Class Online Online Learners continue to discuss the previous topic online Learners post their prior understanding of the topic at the next session online Off-Class 4
6, 8, 15, 20
6, 20 PERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES FREE, OPEN, ADAPTABLE, USER-FRIENDLY
E-LEARNING FLEXIBILITY 2
Reading/ Conferencing Virtual Environment Music/ Collaboration Picture Smart Word Smart Individual Learning Environment Music Smart Virtual Environment Linking Learning Styles with Technology Self Smart Body Smart Video Conference Digital Research People Smart Nature Smart Problem-solving Technology 16 Logic Smart
TRAINING the TEACHER of the FUTURE 14, 24
Blogging As Reflective Practice 7
11 Virtual School
TRAINING the TEACHER of the FUTURE 12, 14, 23, 24
REFERENCES 1. Battalio, J. (2009). Success in distance education: Do learning styles and multiple formats matter? The American Journal of Distance Education, 23, 71-87. 2. Boulton, H. (2008). Managing e-Learning: What are the real implications for schools? The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 6 (1), 11-18 3. Cifuentes, L., Sharp, A., Bulu, S., Benz, M., & Stough, L. (2010). Developing a Web 2.0-based system with user-authored content for community use and teacher education. Education Technology Research and Development, 58, 377-398. 4. Chen, W., & Looi, C.( ). Incorporating online discussion in face to face classroom learning: A new blended learning approach. 5. Courosa (2010). Networked Teacher. Retrieved November22, 2010, from Tangient LLC. Web site: k12learning20.wikispaces.com 6. Dyson, L., Litchfield, A., Lawrence, E., Raban, R., & Leijdekkers, P. (2009). Advancing the m-learning research agenda for active, experiential learning: Four case studies. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25 (2), 250-267 7. Duke WorldPress (2010). Teaching (and Learning) with Google Earth. Retrieved November 22, 2010, from Duke World Press Web site: http://sites.duke.edu/blog/2010/01/11/teaching-and-learning-with-google-earth/ 8. George-Palilonis, J, & Filak, V. (2009). Blended Learning in the Visual Communications Classroom: Student Reflections on a Multimedia Course. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 7 (3), 247 – 256.
9. Greenwich Public Schools, (2010). Information Literacy. Retrieved November 22, 1010, from Greenwich Public Schools Web site: www.greenwichschools.org/page.cfm?p=6657 10. Hutchinson, J. (2009). Use of social softare to address literacy and identity issues in second language learning. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 35 (3). 11. Isenhour, P., Carroll, J., Neale, D., Rosson, M., Dunlop, D. (2000). The virtual School: An integrated collaborative environment for the classroom. Educational Technology & Society, 3 (3). 12. Jiyoon, Y. (2008). Cyber practicum: A future practicum classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (1), 163-165. 13. Kim, K., & Bonk, C. (2006). The future of online teaching and learning in higher education: The Survey says … . Educause Quarterly, 4, 22-30. 14. Ladyshewsky, R., & Gardner, P. (2008). Peer assisted learning and blogging: A strategy to promote reflective practice during clinical fieldwork. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24 (3), 241-257. 15. Lee, M., & Hutton, D. (2007). Using interactive videoconferencing technology for international education: The case of ISIS. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 4 (8). 16. Logie, S. (2010). ICT/Glow & Learning Styles. Retrieved November 22, 2010, from Illumine Ltd. Web site: www.mind-mapping.co.uk/.../education.htm 17. Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. (2009). Podcasting in higher education: What are the implications for teaching and learning? Internet and Higher Education, 12, 88-92.
18. Maydonik, C. (2010). Learner centered pedagogy. Retrieved November 22, 2010, from http://camilleteaches.com/etec-511/philosophy-of-educational-technology/ 19. Mavrou, K., Lewis, A., Douglas, G. (2010). Researching computer-based collaborative learning in inclusive classrooms in Cyprus: The role of the computer. British Journal of Educational Technology. 41 (3), 486-501. 20. McElvaney, J., & Berge, Z. (2009). Weaving a personal web: Using online technologies to create customized, connected, and dynamic learning environments. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 35 (2). 21. Otto, R. (2003). Delivery Modes: Time and place. Retrieved November 22, 2010, from Cognitive Design Solutions, Inc. web site: http://www.cognitivedesignsolutions.com 22. Ray, L., & Atwill, K. (2005). The Web and Special Education. Computers in the Schools, 21 (3), 53-67. 23. Sammons, M., & Ruth, S. (2007). The invisible professor and the future of virtual faculty. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 4 (1). 24. Sprague, D., Maddux, C., Ferdig, R., & Albion, P. (2007). Online education: Issues and research questions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15 (2), 157-166. 25. Zhang, K., & Bonk, C. (2008). Addressing diverse learner preferences and intelligences with emerging technologies: Matching models to online opportunities. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 34 (2).