• Like

Loading…

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Illegal content in P2P networks: first cases in Lithuania

  • 864 views
Uploaded on

presented on 2010.11.25 at MRU conference "Social Technologies 2010: Challenges, Opportunities, Solutions"

presented on 2010.11.25 at MRU conference "Social Technologies 2010: Challenges, Opportunities, Solutions"

More in: Business , Travel , Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
864
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. illegal content in P2P networks: first cases in Lithuania Liutauras Ulevičius Mykolas Romeris University
  • 2. basic facts
    • P2P usage – overhelming, most frequent uses:
      • file sharing, audiovisual content
      • majority of local internet users know/use P2P networks
      • ISP's used to advertise services as „free to get“ audiovisual content
  • 3. cases in Lithuania
    • closing down torrent server
      • dc.meganet.lt
    • „ 106“ case
      • Kaunas district police vs. S.Bernotas
    • Microsoft vs. linkomanija.net
      • server taken-down
    • ...
  • 4.  
  • 5. I. legal vs. illegal
  • 6. theoretical discussion
    • illegal:
      • IPR priority
      • no IPR holder consent
    • legal:
      • IPR holders are in charge to create a new model for remuneration for information exchange
      • public interest to protect free flow of information, provide opportunity for free creativity
  • 7. II. theoretical & pracical problems
  • 8. theoretical problems - who?
    • Device is owned by institution vs. employee
    • free WiFi – user responsibility as contractual clause
    • „ dead PCs“ - no owner will
    • minors
    • ISP obligation to inform/educate
  • 9. theoretical problems - why?
    • A deliberate action or a mistake
    • ISP & LANVA agreement?
    • user to prove safe usage?
    • „ Microsoft“ 30 day trial for „Windows 7“
    • commercial purposes?
  • 10. theoretical problems - why?
    • 6 months to keep data?
    • Temporary PC copy during www browsing?
    • Privacy vs. „Linkomanija“ / LANVA
    • Pirate party: a) no damage for owner; b) piracy as good for development; c) too high value for low owner activity; d) it's not a theft
    • partial distribution = responsibility?
    • some content is legal to distribute via P2P
  • 11. theoretical problems - how?
    • Factual: a) fake IP/MAC addresses; b) IP connection <> copying; c) „Windows 7“usage – PC check needed; d) no certification for „utorrent“ data
    • No formal procedure, regulation for network devices usage (e.g. France)
    • prosecutor or user to prove data were transfered
    • How to check closed-circle networks? (e.g. „Linkomanija“)