web 2.0, library systems and the library system

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    3 Favorites & 1 Group

    web 2.0, library systems and the library system - Presentation Transcript

    1.  
    2.  
    3. Credits
      • Slide 1 . Picture of Sterling Memorial Library. Günter Waibel.
      • Slide 9 . From avlxyz on Flickr. http://www.flickr.com/photos/avlxyz/2077892948/ . License: Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic
      • Slide 10 . eBoy foobar poster. http://hello.eboy.com/eboy/wp-content/uploads/shop/EBY_FooBar_35t.png . Available from http://shop.eboy.com/.
      • Slide 12 . Hugh MacLeod, Gaping Void. http://www.gapingvoid.com/widget.jpg
      • Slide 15 . Bondi Bay. Sydney. Powerhouse Museum. On Flickr commons. http://www.flickr.com/photos/powerhouse_museum/2363539264/ Also at: http://www.powerhousemuseum.com/collection/database/?irn=30669 . No known copyright restrictions.
      • Slides 21-27, 37 . Courtesy of Jim Michalko.
      • Slides 30-32 . OCLC
      • Slide 43. Courtesy of Janifer Gatenby.
    4. RANKIN IN WORLDCAT IDENTITIES
      • Interlude
    5.  
    6.  
    7. Overview End User Access Management Digitised/ Digital Bought/ Physical Elctronic/ Licensed Special colls/ Archives Management
    8. WEB 2.0
      • Part one
    9.  
    10.  
    11.  
    12.  
    13.  
    14. Then: Users built workflow around libraries Now: Library must build services around user workflow Discovery happens elsewhere Disclosure
    15.  
    16.  
    17.  
    18.  
    19.  
    20.  
    21.  
    22.  
    23.  
    24.  
    25. Facebook Google
    26.  
    27. Google Facebook LibraryThing
    28. So …
      • Concentration
      • Diffusion
      • Aggregation of data at the network level
        • Descriptive
        • Mining the clickstream: “Database of intentions”
        • Social
      • Network effects
      • Syndication to many destinations
        • A feed based universe
        • Data
        • APIs
        • Widgets
      • Mobilization in user workflows
      • Encourage social participation
    29. LIBRARY SYSTEMS
      • Part two
    30. User environment Library & Network Resource Management environment End User Access Management Digitised/ Digital Bought / Physical Electronic/ Licensed Special colls/ Archives Management
    31. User environment Library & Network Resource Management environment End User Access Management Digitised/ Digital Bought / Physical Electronic/ Licensed Special colls/ Archives Management Find It Get It Manage It Metadata Content
    32. User environment Library & Network Resource Management environment End User Access Management Digitised/ Digital Bought / Physical Electronic/ Licensed Special colls/ Archives Management Find It Get It Manage It Metadata Content ILL/CIRC LINK RESOLVER SPECIAL SPECIAL ILS ERM REPOSITORY OPAC MetaSearch Website A-Z NextGen MARC DC EAD A&I XXX
    33. Network level – website - workflow Difficult to ‘mobilize’ library resource into workflows A thin layer around complex legacy systems Stuck in the middle Concentration Diffusion Low gravitational pull? Little social dynamic Limited usage data
    34. ‘ Monolithic fragmentation’
      • Move to ‘concentrate’ at local level
        • Single search environments
      • Move to ‘diffuse’ at local level
        • RSS, APIs , ….
      • But …
        • Have to manage presence at the local, group and global level
    35. SYSTEMWIDE ATTENTION
      • Part three
      • Remember ….
      I WAS ASKED TO BE PROVOCATIVE ….
    36. Put another way...
      • “ It is not necessary to change. Survival is not mandatory.”
      • — W. Edwards Deming
    37. A historic note: the good old days
      • Move to group and global
      • Cataloging and resource sharing
      • A&I databases and electronic journals
      • Logic of network environment suggests moving more ….
      • Historic central actors
      • British Library Document Supply Centre
      • JISC
      • ‘ group’ structures less well developed in UK than elsewhere.
    38. Network level services are heavily used, and in many cases are the first port of call for library users Increasing opportunities to build shared capacity, remove unhelpful redundancy, and aggregate data (cf government shared services agenda). Release time and resource to support specific learning and teaching needs of institution. Disclose resources into group and network level services.
    39. … WITH VARYING DEGREES OF PLAUSIBILITY …
      • So:
    40. Group
      • Data?
      • Knowledge base
      • Aggregate usage data
        • Resolver data
        • Download data
        • Database usage data
        • Circulation
      • Shared catalog (cf OhioLink)
      • Syndicate to global (e.g. Google Scholar and union catalogues)
      • Switch to local for fulfilment
      • Applications?
      • Repository
      • Search
        • Institutional search (Primo, WC Local, etc)
        • Metasearch
        • Catalogue
      • ILS????
        • Network effects: e.g. circulation and recommendation
        • Shared selection
        • CIRC <> resource sharing
    41. Group
      • The collective collection?
      • Competition for space and ongoing cost a concern
      • Legacy print collections (cf UK RR)
        • Storage
        • Preservation
        • Access
      • Physical delivery architecture
      • The collective collection?
      • Managing a licensed collection
        • Ebooks
        • Journals
        • Preservation
        • Access models
    42. Where data aggregation is beneficial
      • More effective exposure in a web scale site ( metadata )
      • To attract users and social engagement
      • Avoid redundant data management ( suppliers details, supplier suggestions )
      • Collective knowledge - tasks less complicated or more accurate ( serial prediction )
      • New knowledge via deduction or mining ( holdings count indicating rareness and popularity, supplier performance , enriched name metadata)
      • Most effective management of links and imported enriched data
      • Comparison of collections; facilitating the management of the collective collection
    43. Global
      • Discovery
      • Registry (of institutions, services, collections)
      • Electronic delivery architecture
    44. Local
      • Interpretation of specific research and learning needs of institution
      • Intersection of research/learning and information management
      • Reputation management
      • Disclosure to group and global levels
      • Funding
    45. Management models
      • Collaboratively sourced
      • Centrally provided
      • Third parties
    46. HTTP://ORWEBLOG.OCLC.ORG
      • Thank you
      Think local: Act local, group(al) and global.

    + Lorcan  DempseyLorcan Dempsey, 2 years ago

    custom

    1162 views, 3 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    The Web 2.0 environment is characterized by concent more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 1162
      • 1162 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 3
    • Downloads 22
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Groups / Events