• Like
Web 2.0: How to Stop Thinking and Start Doing: Addressing Organisational Barriers
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Web 2.0: How to Stop Thinking and Start Doing: Addressing Organisational Barriers


Talk given by Mike Ellis at the Museums and Web 2007 conference on 12 April 2007.

Talk given by Mike Ellis at the Museums and Web 2007 conference on 12 April 2007.

Published in Business , Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads


Total Views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. stop thinking, start doing: addressing barriers to web2.0 Mike Ellis, The Science Museum, London Brian Kelly, UKOLN, University of Bath
  • 2. what are we talking about? web 2.0 is.. user generated content rich, “non-weblike” environments mashups radical de-centralisation viral marketing and permission based activity collaboration creative commons
  • 3. or just this: the social web
  • 4. ...the user experience is changing modified from “Hobby Princess” http://tinyurl.com/pmf38 reactive consumption the “basic museum tour” proactive consumption pre-visit research private production photos, text, talking public production sharing our experiences online web 2.0
  • 5.
    • flickr, youtube, myspace: we want some of that!
    • we have some of the best content that there is
    • we have a willingness to get it out there
    • we are holders of lots of niche stuff – the long tail is ours!
    we’re excited because...
  • 6. but barriers feel very real for museums
    • we are excited about the possibilities..
    • ..but have a number of issues with the realities
    • these issues are often not present in small start-ups
    • museum treacle
    • we’re quite bad at change
    • we feel a need to “protect” our audiences
  • 7. barrier #1: why bother (our users don’t care)
    • this new web is nebulous: you can’t draw the same lines
    • user testing is important..
    • ..BUT these are, and should be, NEW audiences
    • sometimes you have to inspire users – web 1994, sms etc!
    “ When we talked with our users about potential Web 2.0 features we could offer on our site (blogs, wikis, etc.), they showed surprisingly little interest in them. The users we interviewed were fairly passive about the types of interactive things they would like to do on our site.” Do you know who your users are? Dana Mitroff and Katrina Alcorn / SFMOMA http://tinyurl.com/2sr22n
  • 8. barrier #2: cultural and political stuff
    • users understand!
    • we can use effective design to separate “ours” from “theirs”
    • the reputations of the bbc, google, amazon are pretty solid
    • our reputation is at stake if we don’t do this
    “ we’ll destroy our reputation – authority is everything to us” “ what about our brand?” “ we’ve never done it like that before”
  • 9. “ It's not wrong to wonder...whether a museum site modelled after the populist photo-sharing http://www.flickr.com -- with favourite artefacts and amateur points of view -- would diminish an institution's reputation... ..the bigger question for all museums is how to flourish if they don't.” Washington Post http://tinyurl.com/mjply barrier #2: cultural and political stuff
  • 10. barrier #3: technical
    • identify enthusiasts and early adopters
    • small scale solutions: rinse and repeat
    • API approach to development IS the future: insist!
    • manage risks, learn from mistakes (they may not happen)
    • build prototypes quickly, but have a plan for migration
    “ what if Yahoo! goes down?” “ we don’t have the expertise” “ it hasn’t been tested”
  • 11. barrier #4: resource and cost
    • yes, it requires resource, but not as much as you think
    • well designed systems will save you huge amounts of time
    • raising barriers to entry is extremely effective
    • users are (usually) pretty sensible
    • an awful lot of this stuff is free, and hosted! (See Who are you calling cheap , Sat 14 th ..)
    “ We’ll need to moderate, and it’ll take an entire team working full time” “ this kit looks expensive”
  • 12. barrier #5: content, legality, context “ we’ve employed 40 curators who have put in 5,000 person-years on this project, and you want us to what? Just give it away...? To anyone...? ”
    • do deals early on with funders and other stakeholders
    • remember that people are already using your content..
    • ..in strange and unusual ways...
    • if you want traffic, encourage them to “borrow” it
    • IPR landscape is constantly changing (YouTube / Warner)
  • 13.
    • we must continue to pioneer
    • funding follows “significant social movement”
    • if we don’t fill this space, someone else will
    • continue to (and get better at) sharing our experiences – see for example http://technorati.com/posts/tag/mw2007
    start doing..
  • 14.
    • this is a change of state.
    • before, we understood the context: it had walls, edges, surfaces.
    • now, we’re struggling with the fact that we’ve got a gas.
  • 15. stonetable.org [email_address] [email_address] thanks for listening questions, thoughts, etc – see http://www.slideshare.net/lisbk/ or http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/